Catalyst Notebook Blog
Return To Main Blog Page
Helping principals, teachers the next wave of performance management Posted By Rebecca Harris On Wednesday, February 3, 2010
In Testing and Accountability

This Friday, CEO Ron Huberman will address school leaders at the Chicago Principals and Administrators Association’s annual conference. His topic: performance management, one of the hallmarks of his year-long tenure as head of Chicago Public Schools.

In spring 2009, department heads in central office began to take part in what some participants described as “grueling” sessions with Huberman’s performance-management team. The goal was to come up with a set of indicators to measure how departmental work impacts student learning. 

For principals, much of the work on performance management takes place in weekly or monthly sessions with chief area officers. The CAOs meet with principals alone or in groups.

“It’s focused on helping principals refine their strategy for helping their schools,” says Jennifer Cheatham, the chief area officer for Area 9. “We try to look at data that is relevant to the particular time of year.”

In group meetings, Cheatham often zeroes in on a particular school’s data, in order to demonstrate the questions principals should be learning to ask themselves.

“We ask questions at different levels of the school system,” Cheatham says. “What does the data tell us about strategies school-wide (to improve) teaching and learning? How do we support particular grade levels? We try to look for teachers that are performing really well (and see) what is that teacher doing that we can spread across the school?”

The district is encouraging chief area officers and principals to experiment with different ways of doing performance management, says Sarah Kremsner, the district’s chief performance officer, who served as vice president for performance management at the CTA.

“We want everybody doing it differently, especially right now,” she says. “We don’t know what the best practices are (for CPS). We’re planning on making some mistakes.”

But so far, Clarice Berry, head of the principals’ association, is skeptical about results.

“It’s simply a concept without definition, at this point,” Berry says. “People have been meeting about it, but how do you put it into action? Once you do it, what’s the next step?

Yet one expert notes that the performance management process could enhance collaboration in a school so that everyone works together on a few critical areas, rather than making scattered efforts to address every problem at once.

“You can build a stronger community,” says Elaine Allensworth of the Consortium on Chicago School Research. “All of our research shows that when you get adults working cooperatively in the schools, building trust and collective responsibility, that’s when you see sustained improvement.”

Just after Huberman took office in early 2009, the district received a $45,000 grant from the Michael and Susan Dell Foundation “to help accelerate the development of CPS' strategic plan under the new CEO and to support building a performance management network for his Performance Management Team.” In short order, more money followed: $1.6 million in November to support “top-to-bottom performance management and district redesign."

But performance management didn’t start with Huberman. Since 2005, the district has received about $9.5 million in Dell Family Foundation funding for the project. The New York City Department of Education and school districts in Austin, Dallas, Oakland and Denver have also received substantial funds.

For principals, a key performance-management tool is the data system known as the “dashboard,” which had its genesis during former CEO Arne Duncan’s tenure.  Principals can use the dashboard to monitor data that are related to student learning, such as attendance, grades, assessment scores, and behavior—for instance, suspensions.

Lori Fey, the Michael and Susan Dell Foundation’s portfolio director of policy initiatives, says the interface (supported by Dell Family Foundation funds) provides principals with easily-accessible data so they can “focus on teaching, rather than data scavenger-hunts.”

Currently, Fey says, CPS is training administrators on the system and developing the processes they will use to interpret the data and create action plans. Teachers may get access to the dashboard down the road, a Dell Family Foundation spokesman notes.

Stephanie Moore, the principal of Uplift Community High School in Uptown, says the dashboard helped her pinpoint a major attendance problem: a dip right after winter break “when it gets really cold.”

This year, she is offering a free Valentine’s Day school dance ticket to anyone who has perfect attendance in January. When a particular student starts to skip class, Moore says, she can quickly alert teachers, parents, and athletic coaches.

She also uses feedback from interim assessments. If students performance shows they haven’t pick up a particular skill, teachers can re-emphasize it in future lessons and provide after-school tutoring.

Many of the principals in three areas, plus 15 additional schools, are using the assessments, which have been part of the New Leaders for New Schools data-driven instruction project for several years. Allison Wagner, the managing director of Chicago’s New Leaders program, says the assessment aligns with ACT standards and is used in three subject areas. Schools can get information back within 48 hours, “so that real-time, live data can be given to teachers,” Wagner says.

With encouragement from central office, similar assessments are making their way around the district. The Scantron Performance Series assessment, designed to provide similarly quick, usable feedback, was piloted this fall by 1,000 high school students and 132 elementary schools.

Every elementary school will get the option by the end of the year, once the district phases in the thousands of new computers that are required to use it.

Uplift, along with a number of other schools, is also using a data wall—a bulletin board, updated every week, to track attendance and performance on the interim assessments. CPS is encouraging schools to use the data walls in a way that will maintain individual students’ privacy.

Districtwide, Kremsner says another goal is to use the data to help provide professional development and coaching that is better tailored to teachers’ needs.

“The more we know about how students are and are not growing, the more we can target coaching and training dollars… to those schools and teachers that want it and need it,” she says. “Any minute that we’re taking a teacher out of a classroom should add inordinate value.”

In Huberman’s first address to principals in June, he announced that they would be expected to hold regular performance management meetings with teachers.

“The vision is, they press a button and a PowerPoint presentation spits out with that month or that quarter’s key trends, graphs and charts,” Kremsner says. “Then, the real work begins.”

Her office is working to provide templates for principals to use when they talk to teachers about data, Kremsner notes, “so we can begin to at least standardize the process of these conversations.”

The district hasn’t determined which indicators will become the core components of performance management, Kremsner says. One task will be to find more timely and useful assessment data than the ISAT (Illinois Standards Assessment Test).

“A once-a-year, high-stakes test isn’t an actionable piece of data,” Kremsner says. “Over the course of the year, you won’t be able to have that kind of weighty, meaty, statistically significant data that education has relied on for a long time.”

Zoila Garcia, the principal of Whittier Elementary School in Lower West Side, says the district’s emphasis on value-added ISAT scores (a schoolwide measure of growth on the test) has been confusing.

“(It’s) difficult to see how it’s really tied to students,” Garcia says. What’s more, Garcia adds, principals have always used data in their work, even though it may have played a less prominent role.

“The only difference is that now, we are being told what data to look at,” Garcia says. “It’s helpful… but it is also important to do something. Looking at data, just for the sake of data, is not going to change anything.”




Comments
Thu Feb 4, 2010 at 12:20 AMBy: Computer will be used to test and not to create! Helping principals, teachers the next wave of performance management Technology wasted on testing. Labs will be closed down for periods of time so that this testing can go on. I hear the trials are not going well and that schools do not have enough computers.
Thu Feb 4, 2010 at 1:36 AMBy: closing hearings tell the truth Helping principals, teachers the next wave of performance management everyone should come to the school closing hearings and really see how the Board twists data to justify closing schools. in all the testimony i have documented none of the data cps has presented is factual or an honest depiction of what is happening at a particular school proposed for closure, turnaround or consolidation.

John Kugler
kuglerjohn@comcast.net

The Hawthorne effect is a form of reactivity whereby subjects improve an aspect of their behavior being experimentally measured simply in response to the fact that they are being studied, not in response to any particular experimental manipulation.

Campbell's Law
"The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor."

What Campbell also states in this principle is that "achievement tests may well be valuable indicators of general school achievement under conditions of normal teaching aimed at general competence. But when test scores become the goal of the teaching process, they both lose their value as indicators of educational status and distort the educational process in undesirable ways. (Similar biases of course surround the use of objective tests in courses or as entrance examinations.)"

http://coreteachers.com/2010/01/21/cps-closing-hearings/
Thu Feb 4, 2010 at 7:26 AMBy: PM Clowning by Huberman and Cheatham Helping principals, teachers the next wave of performance management Huberman does not know how to administer a school district. Obvious.
Cheatham has never been a principal. So what authority does she bring to the table on administering schools? She was a turn around bureaucrat in California. PM is a con job to hide the incompetence of Central Management on improving schools. What is interesting is the how the Public Relations verbiage is full of words that sound nice but mean nothing.


1. The way schools will improve is by developing professional leadership capacity in the schools by providing school organizations flexible time to self organize as a staff so that same and cross grade teams can collaborate on planning, strategy, evaluating student work and peer reviews.

2. The short instructional day in CPS is a crime. It robs the teachers of valuable time to teach in depth and it cheats highly challenged students of the time they need to move into mastery. Give the professionals in the classroom the additional time.

3. Using assessments for measuring pears when it was built to measure apples is a common problem faced by teachers and students. Too many assessments interrupts instruction. These folks who mandate these never taught!!!. Crazy!
Thu Feb 4, 2010 at 10:08 PMBy: hey kremsner Helping principals, teachers the next wave of performance management Our new laptops that you bought a la Ron--the batteries/charge lasts for 30 minutes. the tests are 50 minutes each, per student, minimum. Thanks a lot. You did not even think to ask how long the laptop batteries lasted?! No they are NOT plug in--they have to go back in the cart to charge--how foolish. How wasteful, how uninformed and inexperienced you all are. Our 5th grade students even commented: "didn't they check on the battery life before they bought these?"
Fri Feb 5, 2010 at 1:25 AMBy: To Hey Kremser Helping principals, teachers the next wave of performance management First, buy power strips. Turn desks to walls. Plug into power strips. 5 kids can do same on cart.
Ideal, no. Long-lasting batteries would have been minimally sound. But you have to keep the room humming! Plus, for silent, intense writing, an inverted circle works quite well.
Fri Feb 5, 2010 at 4:37 PMBy: to to hey kresmer Helping principals, teachers the next wave of performance management we have only 3 outlets in the room to use with these laptops--yes, of course we are getting power strips, but please--our 33 kids in the class should not have to trip over all the wires--this should not have been a problem in the first place. Thanks for the tip, prior knowledge by the uppers at central office would have been so much better, so sane.
Fri Feb 5, 2010 at 11:21 PMBy: Elaine Allensworth Resign with some dignity! Helping principals, teachers the next wave of performance management The vaunted Research Consortium at U of C must support the words that come from Ms. Allensworth in support of Huberman? How do they let her support and enable the worthless piece of paper called the PM toolkit. The standing of the Consortium gets cut low again by Ms. Allensworth and her support of the destruction of public education. Why Allensworth is still employed by Consortium is a mystery.
Sat Feb 6, 2010 at 12:51 PMBy: Please look at the Toolkit Helping principals, teachers the next wave of performance management our principal shared it with us yesterday and it is all about ASSESSING students. Please tell us when to we actually get to teach! Catalyst, please look at the toolkit, Ron Estvan, please look. This is sad, so sad. Is this really a UC product?
Sat Feb 6, 2010 at 7:41 PMBy: Danny Helping principals, teachers the next wave of performance management Re: Please look at the Toolkit

Try *reading* the 34-page Toolkit for yourself. The central component is weekly/biweekly teacher team meetings to analyze student work.

I'm confused by what you mean when you say "it is all about ASSESSING students." A good deal of teaching is about assessing students.

These may be common assessments given by teachers on the same team (either grade-level or course-specific) or other teacher-created assessments. They are not standardized tests nor do they have to be "tests."

If you're the kind of teacher who gives assignments to students and then "checks" them off as being completed, then I can see why you are so woeful. But if you read/mark/score student work, then you will already have done the work you need to bring with you to the team meetings and share with other teachers.

You do assign at least *one* learning activity/assessment/project per week, don't you?
Sat Feb 6, 2010 at 11:14 PMBy: teacher Helping principals, teachers the next wave of performance management danny!

I agree turning kids into data machines is BADDD news....my question to all of these assements....who is assessing the assessors???? Yeah I can say that johnny got 9 out of 10 on the Reading test or rit score or 213..BUT WHAT PROOF DO WE HAVE THAT THE RESULTS ARE VALID or USEFUL????? We take these tests in computer labs with kids piled one another after xmas break? they dont know what the H(*&(*& is going on?? Yet we make this the holy grail of education..who is to say the ISAT is even valid???
Wed Feb 10, 2010 at 9:49 AMBy: Perspective from a non-educator Open but skeptical... I'm not a teacher or a principal. I'm not a student. But I do care deeply about this great city and believe that every student has a right to a stellar education especially if they and Chicago are going to be competive in the big wide world..If students are really to benefit from any of this why aren't we spending more time and energy on supporting TEACHERS? Seems like CPS is a slave to the Dell $ not to actual school improvement. Who are these people without any educational background making these decisions anyway? To work in a kitchen, don't you have to know how to cook? I get CPS needs some help and I don't disagree looking at some data to pin-point problem areas. Why doesn't CPS provide a framework on how to assess and let schools manage the assessment process. The results will be tailored to each school. Arbitrary tests and crunching numbers only to hand them over to the "data gods" in CPS to have THEM tell you what is wrong seems really inefficient.
Thu Feb 11, 2010 at 2:35 PMBy: Rebecca Harris, Associate Editor Helping principals, teachers the next wave of performance management Thank you for all your comments. I wanted to offer a couple quick points of clarification:
- Elaine Allensworth commented for this story before the new performance management toolkit was released, or even announced.
- The toolkit is not, to my knowledge, a University of Chicago product... it was developed by the district.

In response to "Please look at the toolkit": I will make sure we do some more in-depth coverage of the kit and how it is being implemented in the near future.

top
Add Your Comment

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Catalyst-Chicago reserves the right to delete or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Reader comments are limited to 500 words.





Comment:
Just so we know you're a human and not a spammer, please answer the following question: + =
Search