In Testing and Accountability
Some principals and school staff should be sweating right now, while others can breathe a sigh of relief: CPS officials could announce, as early as this week, which schools to close or turnaround this year.
At the Dec. 16 School Board meeting, the district laid out its clearest criteria yet for closing and turning around underperforming schools. The turnaround process sends the principal and staff packing.
Our analysis at Catalyst Chicago shows that some 35 elementary schools and 25 high schools could qualify, leaving district administrators plenty of discretion about where to intervene. Historically, CPS has closed or turned around about 10 schools a year.
Several principals were surprised to hear that their school could qualify.
“This is quite alarming information for me,” says Demetrius Bunch, principal of Louis Armstrong Math and Science Elementary in Austin.
On the same day the criteria were announced, the district posted a review of schools’ performance measures on its Research and Accountability website. Still, many principals don’t know it exists and don’t know their school’s status.
“Every staff member would like to know what the status or the performance of the school is, straight from the principal’s mouth, instead of hearing it from hearsay or seeing it on a website,” Bunch says. “Certain things should be done in a decent manner.”
Under the policy, any school that has scored less than 33.3 percent on the district’s performance policy, which incorporates test scores and other measures like attendance and dropout rates, in both the 2007-08 and 2008-09 school years can be turned around.
The district can also close elementary schools that meet these criteria, or that have fewer than 250 students and less than 40 percent utilization. However, central office will not intervene in Fresh Start union-run schools, or schools with principals hired less than two years ago.
The release of the criteria represents increased transparency for the district’s controversial closing and turnaround policies. “I think for some time, this has been too murky,” Board of Education member Norman Bobins said shortly before the policy was adopted.
A principal from a Northwest Side high school that qualifies to be turned around sounded resigned when he heard the news. Like so many high schools in Chicago, there have been many tries to improve his school, from reconstitution to creating small learning communities.
On one hand, the principal says it’s good that the district not give up on improving chronically struggling schools. But on the other hand, turning schools around takes an emotional toll, and data cannot tell the story of all the positive effects.
“Relationships are a part of it,” says the principal, who has been at his school for five years. “Performance management (the district’s data-driven approach to improvement) doesn’t pick up what evolves in the hearts and minds of people.”
He notes that some of the schools that have been turned around, like Fenger, have seen their climate suffer.
Sonja James Bellephant, who became principal of Grand Boulevard’s Parkman Elementary in 2008, says she is glad the policy will give principals time to transform their schools before the district steps in.
“To do any good, anywhere, takes time,” Bellephant says. “For new principals, that data is owned by someone else.”
In addition to neighborhood schools, six of the district’s charter schools scored low enough to be eligible for turnaround or closure if they were neighborhood schools. Those schools are Chicago International Charter School – Washington Park; the Barbara A. Sizemore Academy of Betty Shabazz International Charter School; ACT Charter High School; ACE Technical Charter High School; Young Women’s Leadership Charter School; and Youth Connections Alternative Charter School.
|
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS ELIGIBLE FOR TURNAROUND OR CLOSING |
|||
|
School Name |
Area |
% of Possible Points 08-09 |
% of Possible Points 07-08 |
|
PARKSIDE |
17 |
7.10% |
33% |
|
WOODSON SOUTH |
13 |
9.50% |
29% |
|
GILLESPIE |
17 |
11.90% |
31% |
|
RUGGLES |
14 |
11.90% |
29% |
|
MCNAIR |
3 |
14.30% |
24% |
|
MADISON |
17 |
16.70% |
29% |
|
O'TOOLE |
13 |
16.70% |
31% |
|
ROSS |
13 |
16.70% |
31% |
|
DENEEN |
14 |
19.00% |
26% |
|
DEPRIEST |
3 |
19.00% |
26% |
|
GUGGENHEIM |
14 |
19.00% |
26% |
|
MOLLISON |
13 |
19.00% |
29% |
|
PARKER |
14 |
19.00% |
33% |
|
TILL |
15 |
19.00% |
29% |
|
AVALON PARK |
17 |
21.40% |
26% |
|
BARTON |
14 |
21.40% |
33% |
|
CARTER |
13 |
21.40% |
21% |
|
LAWNDALE |
9 |
21.40% |
29% |
|
LIBBY |
13 |
21.40% |
26% |
|
KEY |
3 |
23.10% |
23% |
|
ARMSTRONG, L |
3 |
23.80% |
33% |
|
BOND |
14 |
26.20% |
29% |
|
MAY |
3 |
26.20% |
29% |
|
CROWN |
10 |
28.60% |
33% |
|
WADSWORTH |
15 |
28.60% |
24% |
|
EMMET |
3 |
31.00% |
31% |
|
FAIRFIELD |
11 |
31.00% |
29% |
|
FERMI |
15 |
31.00% |
12% |
|
MORGAN |
16 |
31.00% |
29% |
|
SMYTH |
9 |
31.00% |
29% |
|
SULLIVAN |
17 |
31.00% |
31% |
|
WOODS |
14 |
31.00% |
29% |
|
HIGH SCHOOLS ELIGIBLE FOR TURNAROUND |
|||
|
School Name |
Area |
% of Possible Points 08-09 |
% of Possible Points 07-08 |
|
ROBESON |
23 |
8.30% |
14% |
|
CLEMENTE |
25 |
11.10% |
17% |
|
ROOSEVELT |
54 |
16.70% |
22% |
|
CHICAGO VOCATIONAL |
24 |
16.70% |
17% |
|
HOPE |
21 |
16.70% |
23% |
|
WASHINGTON |
23 |
16.70% |
14% |
|
GAGE PARK |
23 |
16.70% |
17% |
|
PHILLIPS |
19 |
19.40% |
28% |
|
SCHOOL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP |
24 |
19.40% |
21% |
|
CRANE |
21 |
22.20% |
8% |
|
SCHURZ |
19 |
22.20% |
25% |
|
SENN |
25 |
22.20% |
33% |
|
TILDEN |
23 |
22.20% |
8% |
|
HYDE PARK |
24 |
22.20% |
19% |
|
HARLAN |
23 |
25.00% |
11% |
|
SCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP |
24 |
25.00% |
15% |
|
SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY |
24 |
25.00% |
21% |
|
FENGER |
29 |
25.00% |
14% |
|
DYETT |
21 |
27.30% |
27% |
|
FOREMAN |
26 |
27.30% |
21% |
|
HIRSCH |
23 |
27.30% |
24% |
|
DUNBAR |
19 |
27.80% |
17% |
|
NEW MILLENNIUM |
23 |
27.80% |
27% |
|
CHICAGO DISCOVERY |
24 |
30.60% |
22% |
|
FARRAGUT |
26 |
30.60% |
19% |
|
SULLIVAN |
19 |
30.60% |
33% |
Notes: This list includes each non-charter, non-Fresh Start school that received less than 33.3 percent of possible points on the district’s performance policy, unless the school’s principal – according to a phone survey, principal tenure data, and Chicago Public Schools principal contract records – has worked at the school for less than two years. Principal tenure information may contain errors.
Sources: Chicago Public Schools principal contract records and principal tenure data; school survey of principal tenure; school performance policy data provided by the Chicago Public Schools Office of Research, Evaluation and Accountability
Although, i am aware of the pressure put on principals and instructors, what pressures are put on the students and their parents and/or guardians?
Some may poo-poo this says, but it rings true for me. You can bring a horse to water, but you can't make it drink. My Mom would say that to me from time to time.
i am not a teacher, but i have relatives in the Chicago Public School System. They are dedicated and concerned educators.
Hats off to all principals and educators. You have one person on your side. God bless you, all!
It seems like CPS has not followed the law in holding meetings according to this new law, so if it announces any closings or whatever they call it it would be a violation of the law.
Public Act 096-0803
(5) School openings, school closings, school consolidations, school turnarounds, school phase-outs, school construction, school repairs, school modernizations, school boundary changes, and other related school facility decisions often have a profound impact on education in a community. In order to minimize the negative impact of school facility decisions on the community, these decisions should be implemented according to a clear system-wide criteria and with the significant involvement of local school councils, parents, educators, and the community in decision-making.
(6) The General Assembly has previously stated that it intended to make the individual school in the City of Chicago the essential unit for educational governance and improvement and to place the primary responsibility for school governance and improvement in the hands of parents,teachers, and community residents at each school. A school facility policy must be consistent with these principles.
Public Act 096-0803
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/publicacts/fulltext.asp?Name=096-0803
john kugler
kuglerjohn@comcast.net
Now as to the actual performance scores and their calculation that was established at the June Board meeting. The math of the calculation that creates the performance score itself is odd in many respects. For example significant weight is given in the elementary school calculation to eighth (or highest grade) ISAT test scores which compose 14.29% of the total possible points in this elementary school 42 point system. The reality is in Chicago it was the seventh grade ISAT scores that were critical in determining the future of children until CPS revised its selective high schools admissions policy just a month ago. Moreover, in elementary schools with high mobility rates a good number of students in eight grade may have only been in the school for a year or two and it is hard to argue that the elementary school they are attending is fully responsible for these students academic standing. CPS attempts to offset this mobility factor with yet another component.
That offset is the complex Value-Added ISAT math and reading components which together compose 28.57% of the total possible points in this elementary school 42 point system. According to the CPS Board report that created this performance score value added scores are defined as: “the metric that assesses school effects on students’ academic growth,
controlling for student characteristics, grade level, and prior performance through a regression methodology. Academic growth is measured by the change in scale score points on the ISAT from one year to the next.”
Value-Added metric (VAM) according to CPS accounts for the following student-level characteristics: Prior ISAT score, Free / Reduced Lunch Status, Grade Level, IEP status, Gender, ELL status, and Mobility. However, in all the information CPS has provided on the value added metric it has also included the following cautionary notes: “Only a Data Metric – Not intended to provide information on what to do,” “Based on Statistical Estimation – Cannot account for all external factors, but confidence intervals are provided so that information can be interpreted with caution.” There is more cautionary note than just what the CPS department of applied research has presented on its web site. Terry Hibpshman writing for the Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board in September 2004 ( see http://www.kyepsb.net/documents/Stats/Journals/Heterogeneity%20of%20regression.pdf ) states that “None of the (VAM) models can be shown to have sufficient precision to be useful in a high-stakes environment.”
While VAM seems to have some value in understanding student improvement, it does seem questionable whether is should be such a big component of the ultimate high stakes test, one that could lead to a school being closed and all its staff fired. I can really see nothing in the literature that that would recommend that VAM should compose 28.57% of the life and death performance scores being used by CPS for elementary schools.
Rod Estvan
This year, CORE will be hosting another community forum, where they will unveil their slate of officers who will run against Marilyn Stewart and the UPC Machine in the May 2010 Chicago Teachers Union elections. CORE will also be hosting workshops where they will teach you how to fight and win! 10 AM-1 PM. Malcom X College 1900 W. Van Buren 60612. Parking Available off Jackson. Refreshments and childcare will be provided. $10 suggested donation.
CPS is gearing up to announce what schools it intends to close, it's time to gear up the effort to stop them.
Joe Linehan
CORE
he report notes that U.S. teachers participate in workshops and short-term professional development events at similar levels as teachers in other nations. But the United States is far behind in providing public school teachers with opportunities to participate in extended learning opportunities and productive collaborative communities. Those opportunities allow teachers to work together on instructional planning, learn from one another through mentoring or peer coaching, conduct research on the outcomes of classroom practices, and collectively guide curriculum, assessment, and professional learning decisions.
“The United States is squandering a significant opportunity to leverage improvements in teacher knowledge to improve school and student performance,” http://www.srnleads.org/press/prs/nsdc_profdev.html
PS-I'm happy you found another job. When you have good karma you always land on top. Sorry to see CPS has lost yet another veteran to someplace else. Thank you for all of this information. It has been very helpful.
Are there underperforming schools and bad teachers? Absolutely! However, the problem starts at home. When 75% of the parents do not speak English (as it is in my wife's school), it becomes increasingly difficult to effectively communicate. How can you possibly inform parents that their child is underperforming if they don't show up to report card pickup and a note sent home in English will be ineffective? Thankfully, my wife is bilingual, but I feel real sympathy for those non-Spanish speaking teachers who are at a severe disadvantage.
Look at the schools on the list... many of them are from low-income neighborhoods, with little home access to computers and learning material, but no shortage of cell phones, SUVs and XBoxes. In my opinon, these parents need to enforce education and less time in the nail salon.
We MUST elect a better mayor since Daley has taken charge of CPS and made closed and consolidated schools into charter schools for his own braging rights. Those Charter schools do not help but have hindered and hurt the children of Chicago. GET DALEY OUT OF OFFICE, ALL OF THE CPS PERSONNEL THAT WERE HIRED BY HUBERMAN AND HUBERMAN HIMSELF.
THEN vote out of office the politicans that promise to clean up state government while keeping their job safe, like Mike Madigan.
Turn around schools are not working; they are not the solution. For example, I know a teacher who used to work at one of these schools. She had 35 second graders, and slowly she was making a difference and helping kids. One student who had had many behavior problems a day would only have 1-2 a week! That is a big improvement, especially since he was also beginning to read and participate in class. But, last year the school was shut down and all of the teachers were fired. Well, one of her former students just brought a gun to school... so is the "new" turnaround school helping the kids? No.
I'm a former CPS teacher and am currently battling with CPS and looking for an attorney. Could you steer me in the right direction? How should we contact one another? Thank you!
Luis
The new principal at Madison, screams, hollers and demeans students a staff. She even had an incident where she assaulted a parent and a teacher. I don't see how CPS can support this angry person. She has totally collasped the school in 2 years.
In 2006-2007 they had 2 hard working Lead teachers who loved the students and worked with them. The school was not on probation.
She got rid of both of them when she came in. Since then the school had been on the decline.
However, this principal didn't do anything to help those poor children and they despised her. She was extremely mean to parents and would not allow them in the building.
Once, I met a student who attended Madison in the grocery store and asked her if she had graduated. The student responded, " I hate that school and the principal". Before that, this was one of the best students in the school.
Maybe if Madison closes, it will allow the students who live in the area to have the kind of quality education and respect they so deserve.
I need to talk with you. We have a similar issue and I have talked with an attorney who says he can represent a group of teachers who have had principals falsify documents. I have talked with 5 teachers who have similar stories. Maybe we could set up a place to meet because I am in litigation also.
A message to all tenured veteran teachers. If you feel that a principal doesn't care for you, keep plenty of documentation, report everything that may seem out of order. If students act out in a way that threatens you, you can't just look the other way and call the parent like we used to. Report any instance of abuse to the police.
Believe me, the law department will try to support any lie that the principal tells on you. They may add a few themselves. However, if you have documentation you will win your case even if you have to take it into federal court.
The union is useless and will not support you. They will support the principal.
As far as turn-a-rounds, most parents in at risk communities don't really know what is happening. Teachers are spending so much time documenting things to save their jobs, there is little teaching going on in their buildings. Many of the most talented teachers are being
fired because they are smart, thinkers and will not go along with the
abuse of children or staff.
Have you noticed that the schools where they have these principals who are acting out like this are on the closing list?
I think it's part of the gentrification scheme. They know these principals have emotional issues and are not fit to run a school.
I think they just put them in the building to destabilize the school so that it can be turned around.
They attack and fire everyone in the building and later after they've done the dirty work for CPS they fire them. That goes for AIO's too.
Not to mention the CPS Board President!
Notice how we have the same story and don't know each other. These tactics are used city-wide.
WHO SUFFERS? OUR CHILDREN! Children need teachers to be focused and not at war with the principal and the law department.
Look forward to hearing from you Amber.
I'd definitely be willing to talk/meet with both of you and/or anyone else who is caught up in CPS' unethical mess. What is the best way we can connect? I'd prefer not providing personal info here (e-mail address, etc.) but again, I do want to discuss this issue with both of you. Believe me, what I have to say will be very helpful, I'm sure. Can you guys provide info in some way or maybe via a third party and I will contact you ASAP!
Hang out with CORE Friday, January 15th. We will be at 2 locations starting at 4:00 PM:
Artis’ 1249 E. 87th St
It you can make it we'll exchange information there.
O.K. Hope to see you tonight.
I agree with every point you have made. Let's hope enough people join together and take action. I already have.
This whole Rennaisance plan is not about better schools and better education with these "Charter Schools its about doing away with teachers that have bee around that know how to teach so that CPS can hire younger cheaper teachers that they give less benefits and less pay too. The teacher's union needs to wake up because soon they will be obsolete in the City of Chicago. Meanwhile the corruption in high places goes on. Come on Mr. Huberman you want to fix your budget. Start with your own office. Getting rid of experienced teachers on the expense of children is not the way to fix your budget.
Do you honestly believe that these kids coming right out of college really know how to handle children with social problems. My fiance has had in the past 8th grade students that had not one but two children. 8th grade students that have been caught smoking pot in school. 8th grade students that can't read let alone write but get passed through the system because everyone is afraid to hold them back.
So where are the parents. Its hard to say but I tell you where I think they are. Just recently she had a discussion in her Science class about field irrigation in agriculture and whe she asked a child what the purpose of the pipes were, the child answered, for smoking. There is your answer, the parents don't care they are only worried about their own problems and keeping themselves afloat. To them education is a pipe dream, just that and you have to change that before you can expect anyone to be able to do anything with these children.
thanks,
JC
which stresses only data or the special pet projects of colleges like the University of Chicago?
Remember the Universities get paid to experiment with student education. So does that make our children human 'lab rats'?
which stresses only data or the special pet projects of colleges like the University of Chicago?
Remember the Universities get paid to experiment with student education. So does that make our children human 'lab rats'?
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Catalyst-Chicago reserves the right to delete or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Reader comments are limited to 500 words.


Digg
Del.icio.us
Mail

