Catalyst Notebook Blog
Return To Main Blog Page
Chicago revamps mentoring for new teachers Posted By Rebecca Harris On Monday, January 4, 2010
In Teachers Following some start-up delays, the district has launched its latest new-teacher mentoring program in some 330 new schools—the third time in recent years that CPS has revamped teacher induction in a bid to raise teacher quality and improve retention.

The Chicago New Teacher Center is the district’s most ambitious effort to date and marks the first time CPS has turned to an outside organization—the highly regarded New Teacher Center, a nonprofit organization that began at the University of California in Santa Cruz—for mentoring and induction. The $3.5 million price tag (for about 1,000 teachers this year, or $3,500 per teacher) is far higher than for previous programs, including the most recent GOLDEN mentoring program and its predecessor, MINT.

The money, however, will provide a more extensive array of services, including a two-day summer orientation, coaches, networking with other rookie teachers and professional development events. The program could end up saving money for some schools, says a CPS spokesman: With the GOLDEN program, schools received a stipend to pay for mentoring, but some schools supplemented the payment with their own discretionary funds.

Delays initially cropped up last fall. For one, matching of new teachers and mentors was slowed because schools did not always complete their hiring in time and eligible teachers were not identified right away.

The Center matches every new teacher with a coach, a veteran mentor who works with 15 to 30 teachers at a time. The coaches observe and meet with the veteran about three times a month during the school year, and the mentors provide support in areas ranging from content knowledge to lesson planning and classroom management strategies.

Ideally, the matches would be made before the start of the school year, says David Osta, the Center’s director of policy and communications. But this year, that did not happen. “Hiring tends to be a bit of a rolling process in Chicago,” Osta says. “It doesn’t happen as smoothly and stepwise as you’d always hope.”

The biggest challenge was identifying first- and second-year teachers, who are eligible for the program, says CPS spokesman Malon Edwards. A new tool that allows principals and district administrators to track the tenure progress of probationary teachers will make the process easier in the future, he says.

This year, coaches worked with principals to find first- and second-year teachers who were not identified in the district’s human resources database, Osta says. The group had to screen out those who appeared to be new, but actually had experience teaching in a private school or another state. Chicago New Teacher Center staff also examined teachers’ graduation dates, looking for new hires who might have fallen through the cracks.

“It’s always a challenge to locate first- and second-year teachers. The data system isn’t exactly designed for that,” Osta says. “Where it is not clear, we have to talk to them and find out a bit more about their background and experience.”

Spurring research, improving school climate

The Center, which first debuted in CPS in 2006, is in a total of 375 schools this year. It is
optional for schools affiliated with other support programs, including the Academy for Urban School Leadership, the Teacher Advancement Program, and Fresh Start. (Just three schools opted out: Disney II Magnet School in Irving Park, Northside College Prep in North Park, and Fenger High School in Roseland.)

To smooth the transition from GOLDEN, coaches are tailoring their practice to each principal’s goals, Osta says. “A lot of principals previously did not know us,” he says. “We don’t want to be seen as pushing into their building.”

Carl Dasko, the principal of Bateman Elementary School in Irving Park, says his new teachers started to meet with their coaches in late October. The program’s one weakness, Dasko notes, is the lack of daily interaction with a mentor in the building—something that was provided by GOLDEN.

“We informally hook them up with a teacher who can be a go-to person, but that’s not nearly as structured as before,” Dasko says.

John Price, the principal of Audubon Elementary School in North Center, says teachers are glad to work with a full-time coach who doesn’t report to the same principal they do.
“One of the realities was that teachers have their own kids. (Mentoring) was something that got added on when possible,” Price says.

Dasko and Price both believe the New Teacher Center’s work needs more evaluation.
“If the teachers are reporting that it’s not helpful or supportive, then I’m going to try to advocate for something (based) here in the school itself,” Price says.

The Consortium on Chicago School Research will spend the next year analyzing the group’s coaching activities. A study slated to be released in the fall will describe the coaches’ work and the practice of the beginning teachers, laying the groundwork for possible evaluation and impact studies in the future.

A report  that the Consortium released this August – “The Schools Teachers Leave: Teacher Mobility in Chicago Public Schools” – found that schools with high levels of parent involvement, a collaborative work environment, and strong principal leadership have lower rates of teacher turnover.

In an effort to address two of those factors, the Center’s work includes training on teacher-parent relationships and support for principals whose schools have a high number of new teachers, Osta notes.

“We found that report to be very insightful,” he says. “It was a case of research confirming what we’d experienced in the field.”




Comments
Tue Jan 5, 2010 at 5:27 PMBy: follow the money Chicago revamps mentoring for new teachers Follow the money on this one--watch for all the consultants who are making big money on this program and mentors who have little exp. in the classroom, or ran away from the classroom as soon as they could. This program has not been good for us and the principal is too afraid to voice our concerns. We enjoyed Golden and feel sad for our new teachers.
Tue Jan 5, 2010 at 7:04 PMBy: mentor teacher Chicago revamps mentoring for new teachers I went through the mentor training described above. I can't say I was terribly impressed, and I am shocked that each mentor (myself) had $3500 spent. We received $1000 each to work with our mentees for the full year (I meet with my mentees for 45 minutes each week per mentee) from the program, and that included 7 days of training. I am curious where the other $2500 went.

For anyone who has been through education classes, the program was at that level. The painful attempt was made to engage teachers who really don't need to role play or make "quadrant partners" for discussions.

I don't want to sound like a negative nelly, but the whole song and dance is really unnecessary. Good mentoring starts at the school as a grassroots effort. Teachers and administrators need to foster a community of collaboration and consideration; faculty need to be willing to spend the extra minute to help unjam a copier, explain how the online gradebook works, share a work book or other resource, and give teaching and organizational strategies to colleagues (any colleagues, not just new teachers!) who seek advice or insight.

I realize the drop out rate for teachers is incredibly high, but maybe instead of trying to save new teachers after the fact, we should prepare them before entering the work force with rigorous, hands on education classes -- not B.S. theory, like "discipline" and "wrong" are a bad words that'll crush a child's self esteem.
Tue Jan 5, 2010 at 10:15 PMBy: CD, a Mentor Chicago revamps mentoring for new teachers Quoting from an e-mail I received at 8:03 tonight, from a CPS beginning special education teacher I met with today:"Thank you for all of the support you are giving to new teachers and especially me. I am always so inspired when you come and can accomplish so much after you leave.Looking forward to seeing you again, and keep up the good work you are doing."
Wed Jan 6, 2010 at 6:58 AMBy: It is about building Professional Communities not smoke and mirrors Chicago revamps mentoring for new teachers CPS makes an announcement to give the impression they are "doing" something constructive. After you take away the press release, pretty powerpoint and the dollars they are spending, the details show that CPS runs in "knee jerk" mode. They invent things along the way. Leave the CPS Micky Mouse operatives and download the technical report by the National Staff Development Council on what works in the real world to get high performing schools. One of the keys is building professional communities in each school.

http://www.srnleads.org/press/prs/nsdc_profdev.html

Job Embedded Professional Learning:As noted in the review of the research, there is increasing consensus that the most effective forms of professional development are those that are directly related to teachers’ instructional practice, intensive and sustained, integrated with school-reform efforts, and that actively engage teachers in collaborative professional communities. Teachers in many high-achieving nations have these kinds of opportunities on a regular basis, as considerable time is built into their work week for collegial planning and learning, lesson study, and peer observations.
Wed Jan 6, 2010 at 12:23 PMBy: TR Chicago revamps mentoring for new teachers I went through GOLDEN and all my "mentor" did was collect a check and sign a paper. Chicago New Teacher Center provides real support for new teachers whose coaches are experienced teacher leaders with a lot to offer any teacher.
Wed Jan 6, 2010 at 2:03 PMBy: David Osta Learning more about the Chicago New Teacher Center We are excited about the interest this post has generated about new teacher mentoring in CPS and especially the interest about the work we do at the Chicago New Teacher Center (CNTC).

I invite all of those interested to visit our website - www.chicagontc.org - to learn more about the work we do to support new teacher development in CPS. It contains lots of information about our mentors (we call them coaches) and the work they do with beginning teachers.

Please feel free to reach out to me if you would like to know more about CNTC.

Sincerely,
David Osta
-
Director, Policy and Communications
Chicago New Teacher Center (CNTC)
dosta@newteachercenter.org
Wed Jan 6, 2010 at 6:19 PMBy: legal mentoring mistakes legal mentors hopefully mentors will be fully certified in the ares of instruction they are mentoring for. not like the Fresh Start mentors who were not in the certification areas of the teachers they were "mentoring" in addition it was found the mentors did not even hold valid current ISBE credentials.

If you know of any mentors not the same certification areas as the teacher or not fully certified please forward the information for our investigation and forwarding to the proper government agencies.

By the way David what Illinois certifications do hold that qualify you to be a director of a teacher mentor program? are you a certified teacher or certified administrator?

Would it be legal for a mentor or director of this program not to be certified since they would be observing teachers while students were in a classroom?

Would it be legal to use ed funding to pay a non-certified administrator or mentor?

John Kugler
kuglerjohn@comcast.net
Wed Jan 6, 2010 at 7:10 PMBy: dear TR Chicago revamps mentoring for new teachers To TR-since you went through Golden, how do you know about this new teachers program? you read like a plant from cntc.
Wed Jan 6, 2010 at 8:55 PMBy: new teacher Chicago revamps mentoring for new teachers I am new teacher and it makes me feel so sad to read something like. At CPS, mentoring is not what some of us really need. What new teachers need are workshops on how to use gradebook, basic ins and outs that new teachers are somehow expected to know but are not told about, copier machines at their school that they can freely use for their classes so they can spent their energy productively. Ah, to have that money spent on copier machines for new teachers -instead of $3500 per teacher, $500 for a copier! But I would rather keep spending my personal money and have that $3.5M spent on improving security in schools. Why is the hardly any focus or discussion about what can be done to improve security and discipline? I don't mean security in terms of safety, but in terms of student behavior. My students are quite capable, but they are kids and keep testing their limits. Now they know that they can get away with anything... Thus in addition to quality teaching, we are supposed to be completely responsible for student discipline while the security person is trying to be friends with the students, or is sleeping or eating or reading or no where to find... Help us discipline the kids in the hallway and send them a message that they are accountable. That is the kind of support system we need! There is a direct relationship between the amount of meaningful learning that takes place and the degree of discipline in the school (and I mean in action not words...). I will also add that I have seen so many teachers do nothing but show videos and movies on a regular basis. I have also seen teachers who give the students worksheet and a copy of the textbook to keep them busy while they surf the internet or do other things. These are the same teachers who complain that students can’t learn. Aside from some the serious need for quality teachers who care, I would love to have the issue of security raised and brought into light.
Thu Jan 7, 2010 at 9:34 PMBy: to: new teacher Chicago revamps mentoring for new teachers Your thoughts are clearly from the heart and sincere. They also lack the bitterness and cynicism that a veteran teacher would have towards anyone in charge ever using common sense. New teacher, you are incredibly right on what would be the most important things to ANY teacher. But no one can measure being a decent human being and a helpful colleague, so your common sense approach will never happen.

Everyone in charge wants to cover their butts and claim that they tried to help fix the problem. The students suffer, we as teachers suffer, society suffers.

top
Add Your Comment

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Catalyst-Chicago reserves the right to delete or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Reader comments are limited to 500 words.





Comment:
Just so we know you're a human and not a spammer, please answer the following question: + =
Search