In Government and Policy Reversing himself, CPS CEO Ron Huberman said today that race will be a consideration in admissions to magnet and selective enrollment schools – initially as a backstop to a new policy that relies heavily on other factors.
Huberman also predicted that CPS will wind up back in court, perhaps eventually the U.S. Supreme Court, defending the policy.
Previously, CPS officials ruled out race as a consideration. But at today’s Board of Education meeting, Huberman said that once students have gone through the admission process as laid out in the new policy—passed unanimously—he will look at the racial and socio-economic makeup of the incoming classes. If the populations of magnet or selective enrollment schools are skewed so that there’s less diversity, he said, he will adjust the admission criteria.
“We will do a gut check before sending out admissions letters,” Huberman said. “We will look to see how many white students got in, how many African American, how many Asian?”
In other developments at the board meeting:
• Huberman pledged that he will close no high schools this year because of safety concerns. The administration also presented the board with detailed guidelines for closing schools or putting them on turn-around status. Officials said that under previous the administration, the criteria for closings—mainly under-utilization and poor performance—were unclear.
• During a long, contentious public comment period, a group of parents and activists called for a new neighborhood high school to be opened in Carver Military High School. Instead the board gave the go-ahead to Chicago International Charter School to open a school serving students from 6th to 12th grade in the old Carver Middle School. The activists opposed that move.
The change in course on the magnet and selective enrollment admissions policy comes after weeks of growing discontent with the proposed new policy. In September, a federal judge terminated the desegregation consent decree that required CPS to use race as a factor in determining who was admitted into magnet and selective enrollment schools.
For magnet schools, Huberman’s initial proposal reserved seats for all siblings of currently enrolled students, set aside half the seats for neighborhood children and divided the rest among students in four socio-economic categories, determined by the area in which a student’s family lives. For selective enrollment schools, half of the seats would be awarded by test score ranking and the rest portioned out by socio-economic category.
Announced in early November, CPS officials have spent the last month testing the proposal in six public hearings and meetings with aldermen and community groups. Many expressed concern that the policy would serve to shut out black and Latino students, especially because many of the best magnets are in predominantly white neighborhoods and white and Asian students tend to score better on the admissions test.
Acknowledging those concerns, Huberman revised the proposal to reserve up to 40 percent of seats for neighborhood children in magnets and up to 40 percent awarded based on test scores in selective schools. Huberman could lower the neighborhood and test score rank portion to 30 or even 20 percent if they are causing the schools to re-segregate.
This policy will be in place only for a year. Huberman said that in January he will lay out a more formal process for community input to develop a new policy. He said that after thorough vetting by the legal department, race might be part of the policy created next year.
By the time Huberman made his presentation to the board, many community members had left. Earlier, Phil Jackson, executive director of the Black Star Project, led a group of at least 50 people into the room chanting “Educate or Die.”
Jackson and others accused the district officials of rushing a decision and said that they were wrong to discard race from the admissions’ process.
School closings
Huberman will announce in January which schools he intends to close and turn around. All of them will be subjected to the new criteria that he laid out on Wednesday.
In the past, these drastic steps were taken when a school was under-utilized or had too many students performing below grade level on standardized tests.
Now, CPS officials will look at a broader range of factors, including value-added test scores, attendance and freshmaen course completion rates to determine which schools could be closed for poor performance.
(Also on Wednesday, CPS posted Performance Policy Reports for each school showing how many points they garnered. Schools that got less than 33 percent of possible points are eligible to be shut down or turned around.)
There are also clearer criteria for closures triggered by declining enrollment. A school would have to have both fewer than 250 students, and be using less than 40 percent of its building’s design capacity. Magnet schools and early childhood centers will not be closed.
The closing policy includes a “Student Bill of Rights,” developed partly in response to findings from a report by the Consortium on Chicago Schools Research, that found that many students fell behind after their schools closed but that those in better-performing schools were more likely to catch up.
Now, schools will not be closed unless students can be assigned to a better-performing receiving school. If that school is more than 1.5 miles from a student’s home, the district will provide transportation. The district will also try to provide extended instructional time in all receiving schools.
The district will also complete a “safe passage plan,” with the Chicago Police Department and the Chicago Transit Authority. Huberman pledged that the plan would be shared with parents.
Chicago Board of Education member Norman Bobins pointed out that such steps are easier proposed than taken. “It’s all in the delivery,” he told Huberman, who responded that staff would monitor whether Student Bill of Rights benchmarks had been met for each student in a closing school.
Fenger High School
Testimony before the board grew fiery and disintegrated into several shouting matches as parents and activists decried the violence faced by high school students from the Altgeld Gardens area who travel as far as five miles to attend Fenger High School.
“Every passing period, I’m paranoid because I don’t know if I’m going to get jumped on,” Fenger student Deontea Jones told the board. “We need a neighborhood school so we can have safe passage, and don’t have to worry.”
The neighborhood lost a high school when Carver High School was turned into Carver Military Academy. About two dozen members of the Grassroots Education Movement (GEM), a coalition opposed to Renaissance 2010, gave the board a proposal for a new Hazel Johnson School of Environmental Justice that would share Carver Military Academy’s building, in Hegewisch.
Cheryl Johnson, executive director of People for Community Recovery, said that since the conversion violence has increased.
In the hallway after the testimony of Johnson and others, Chief Administrative Officer Robert Runcie said it was unlikely that the board would grant GEM’s wishes. He said that the CICS charter school set to open in Fall 2010 in the old Carver Middle School had been vetted by the community’s Transition Advisory Council, set up by the Office of New Schools to consider such proposals.
“CICS are high quality schools, and they have long waiting lists,” he said. “A cross-section of community members have determined that this is what they want.”
But Johnson and others said that since the TAC met, the situation has deteriorated, as evidenced by the beating death of Fenger High School student Derion Albert. They said it was an emergency and they wanted a public school that had a local school council. Charter schools are also public, but they are generally run by not-for-profits and have few, if any, parents or community members on a governing board.
In the meantime, Runcie told parents, CPS is addressing Fenger’s problems by bringing in motivational speakers, holding assemblies, and increasing the number of security guards at the school. He said the district had agreed to provide transportation to students who transferred out of Fenger – so far, more than 150 have accepted.
But Rico Gutstein, an education professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, who helped write the neighborhood school proposal, told board members that “the transfers are not the issue.” He asked if they would consider an emergency meeting.
“…Or do you want the blood of another child on your hands, because you refuse to hear the people’s voices and act quickly?”
Chicago Teachers Union President Marilyn Stewart, addressing the board about an unrelated issue, also weighed in.
“Carver was built for the Altgeld community. Give the school back,” she said.
“We will do a gut check before sending out admissions letters,” Huberman said. “We will look to see how many white students got in, how many African American, how many Asian?”
And how is this going to happen if applicants were instructed not to put down racial identity on the form AND if it is prohibited by the court ruling??????? This must have come out off the cuff.
“'We will do a gut check before sending out admissions letters,' Huberman said. 'We will look to see how many white students got in, how many African American, how many Asian?'"
If race wasn't filled out on the application based on the clear answer in the FAQs, how can CPS do what Mr. Huberman said at the meeting? How will they know the race of the applicant? More frustratingly, the FAQs isn't on the web site anymore (though I downloaded a copy from a couple weeks ago).
I'd really like to know just what is going on. This is a public school system, and we are entitled to clear answers from the public officials who run it. Will race be used or not? If yes, exactly how will it will used? (And simply saying race will be used as part of some "gut check" won't pass muster, legally or otherwise.) And how will CPS determine the race of applicants if that information isn't on the application?
Once again proving that the administration cares nothing about what the community wants or needs. If they had listened to that community in the first place, violence related issues would not be as much a problem. This community has been through enough already! Give them what they want and need!! People in the community know their community!!! Administrators in offices and charters from outside the community do not! This is obviously more about privatization than it is about community and education. Sad thing is that its going to go national with Arne Duncan in control of our nation's schools. So much for Obama's bottom-up campaign rhetoric.
But I am thinking about all the parents out there who must be completely and utterly frustrated. They should have had a plan in place all along. The plan should have been the topic of many meetings with parents long ago. This whole thing was no surprise to anyone.
Huberman's comments make it seem like the principals are just going to handpick their kindergarten class. And as the poster before said, race was NOT supposed to be a factor. What are they going to do? Guess from the child's name? Our youngest child was adopted. If we don't have race on her application, how is anyone to know her race (African-American) from her very Swedish last name? Yet, she is not the child they are trying to help in the magnet system, is she?
Yet, that is the "kind" of minority one too-often finds in magnets nowadays, anyway. The "Hispanic" child whose parents are from SPAIN, for example.
The system is very, very broken. It's going to take a lot of hard work to fix it. The only way to help all our children is to help all our schools. I am so, so sorry for the frustration parents are feeling today.
And, yes, thank you Catalyst for being the only source I know for this important information.
The most interesting aspect of this will be the applications from census tracts 1 and 2. If they want to acheive the diversity, they are really going to have to work with principals at selective enrollment schools about minimum cutoffs--that is where the diversity will come from. I suppose they could look up the race of current CPS students but they will not be able to determine the race of those applicants who have not attended CPS schools.
Can anybody inform me on what kind of data is used when checking guts?
I would assume the cut off scores for the Selective schools from tiers 1 and 2 would be lower than for tiers 3 and 4. But if you look at Tier 1 you will see that there is at least one census track in it that has a median family income of $62,139 and probably several other Tracks with a median family incomes somewhat less than than that. There are 210 tracks in tier 1 and I would conservatively estimate there are at least 10 tracks composed of middle income families within that tier. (All of this data is on the CPS web site.)
Some of these middle income tracks in tier 1 are populated by non-minority urban pioneers. These tracks will likely produce the higher scoring students within tier 1, assuming the research on the relationship between income and standardized testing scores is correct. So adjusting down the cut off scores for this tier really may mean nothing in relation to increasing the number of black and hispanic students who qualify for the selective schools.
The actual results will be interesting to see next year, as will the spin CPS may put on those results.
Rod Estvan
I'm somewhat hopeful that Mr. Huberman intends to do the right thing on school closings (though, maybe it's just the euphoria of one more day 'til Christmas break).
The Huberman team certainly doesn't cover for the Duncan administration. You report "Officials said that under previous the administration, the criteria for closings—mainly under-utilization and poor performance—were unclear."
This sounds about right to me, and it shows that the Duncan administration was much more hype than substance.
No.
Is this the gut check or what?????
When taking the selective enrollment exam should a student who runs out of time (a) guess at the remaining questions to finish the test, or (b) leave them blank?
Also, does anyone know if it scored strait on number of answers answered correctly, or by algorithm?
There are so many mixed opinions that it isn't clear how the test is scored. Just hoping to empower the people with some information.
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Catalyst-Chicago reserves the right to delete or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Reader comments are limited to 500 words.


Digg
Del.icio.us
Mail

