In High Schools
Sometime over the past week, CPS officials quietly posted the 2009 Prairie State and ACT test scores. They didn’t hold a press conference or even issue a release, as is the custom. And it is no wonder.
Scores on both exams stagnated this year. And the scores for juniors who have been part of the district’s High School Transformation project since their freshmen year were no better, and in some cases worse, than their predecessors.
The district average ACT composite score inched down from 17.3 in 2008 to 17 last year and the percent of students meeting or exceeding state standards on the Prairie State rose ever so slightly, from 27.9 percent to 28.5 percent. The federal No Child Left Behind Act calls for 70 percent of students to meet standards this year.
The results of these exams were supposed to be the first definitive test of High School Transformation, built on a foundation of new, more-rigorous curricula and teacher training.
But the average ACT score for the 13 schools that started teaching the curricula in 2006 remained at 15.5—way below the 20 needed to get into a selective college. (A 14th school—Mose Vines, a small school that was on the Orr campus—was also part of the original group, but the school was absorbed into Orr last year. Orr is now a turnaround school.)
Only two of the transformation schools—Carver Military and Chicago Military in Bronzeville—saw more than a 1 percentage point increase in their ACT score since 2006. But as well, during this time the two schools have implemented a selective admissions process that also changed the caliber of the students entering.
Over the past year, there have been many indications that the $80 million High School Transformation was not the success that officials hoped. The first-year evaluation report pinpointed many implementation problems, such as high absenteeism among students and a need for better-prepared teachers. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which gave the district $21 million for the program, not only stopped funding it, but also pulled their support from future evaluation reports.
However, Chief Education Officer Barbara Eason-Watkins has previously said the district is committed to continuing the project, including supporting the curricula. She also said previously that the ACT and PSAE scores showed some promise.
Please read Charles Payne's So Much Reform, So Little Change. It is a definitive discussion about the reform efforts in Chicago. It highlights the fact that very few efforts are given a chance to take root and succeed. People underestimate the dysfunction on all levels in the system from the "implementers" on over to the school-level. No one effort is "THE ANSWER". It saddens me as a taxpayer that after an investment in a strategy that in and of itself contains the necessary components but need quite a bit of modification, that people are just willing to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
And of those who are being "failed" by all of this corporate nonsense, the most "failed" by eight years of Arne Duncan were African Americans.
If CPS or the rest of the media in Chicago were asking real questions, these numbers would be the verdict on Arne Duncan as the CPS "Chief Executive Officer" and there would be an immediate clamor, led by the Tribune, to have Barack Obama fire that failure and take a closer look at all the policies he's promoting. That, coupled with a two-year moratorium on high-stakes testing, might begin to undo all the damage that's been done to real schooling of real kids in the real world.
It won't happen, because those with power are wedded to the teacher bashing and privatization agenda they've peddled like leprosy for the past 15 years. And the rest of the USA will be ordered, under pain of not getting "Race to the Top" money, to follow the leadership of Chicago's corporate school reform, the Chicago Boys, and Arne Duncan!
Writing essays, speeches, reports etc. can be fairly easy. The hardest part is
maintaining the proper organizational format and on not digressing from the A noted side effect is that users begin to communicate logically.
main idea. We are automated, so that you stick to the subject and we show you what comes next, actually generating the topic and clincher statements, as well as the paragraphs of introduction and conclusion.
For example if, they give you an essay question, just turn the question into a fact and prove that fact (see “Helpful Hints”). So, be asking you the question, they are giving you half of the answer by showing you exactly what to write about. You’re brilliant. Case closed.
www.TheEasyEssay.com is a free program that is being used from Special Services Education to college education, FCAT, SAT, ACT test preparation, home schooling and more. A noted side effect is that users begin to communicate logically.
Yes, there are multiple excel files on the web at: http://research.cps.k12.il.us/cps/accountweb/Reports/allschools.html
Look under the heading titled "Prairie State Achievement Exam (PSAE) Overtime, 2001 - 2009"
I think that you raise a pertinent point to say that too many school reform efforts don’t get the chance to succeed. Indeed, it would be a miracle for these high schools to be completely changed after only three years of using a new set of curricula, even with intense teacher training. All I was doing was pointing out that there was no change in the average ACT scores over the course of the project. None. CPS officials (and maybe you are one of them) were the ones that told me the PSAE scores of last year’s juniors would be the first test of the project. That is not to say there will not be future tests or that I won’t continue looking at the progress in these schools.
Further, to say other project components besides the curriculum packages are never discussed is unfair. I am well aware that the original project included such initiatives as smoothing the transition to high school and hiring and training better principals. But it is clear that the foundation is and always has been the curriculum packages. In fact, CPS officials have, themselves, abandoned the term High School Transformation and now refer to the project as the IDSes, which stands for Instructional Development System and is the curriculum packages only.
Unless you have evidence otherwise, I have been told that the Gates Foundation did stop funding the program last year. You are right to say the original grant was for $21 million and covered three years, the 2006-2007, 2007-2008 and the 2008-2009 school years. However, if the project was showing wild success, might Gates continue funding it? The fact is, they didn’t.
And Gates very pointedly decided to stop funding the evaluation reports which were supposed to continue for at least four years. The report released by SRI International and the Consortium on Chicago School Research found many serious problems with the implementation of the project, including the inability to deal with chronic absenteeism and continued problems with teacher quality.
2. Payton with 100% of senior class with ACT composite scores of 20 or better overall average ACT score 28.2
3. Young with 96.6% of senior class with ACT composite scores of 20 or better overall average ACT score 25.9
4. Jones with 86.3% of senior class with ACT composite scores of 20 or better overall average ACT score 24.2
5. Lane with 78.9% of senior class with ACT composite scores of 20 or better overall average ACT score 22.4
6. Brooks with 67.9% of senior class with ACT composite scores of 20 or better overall average ACT score 21.1
Perhaps these tests were given to evaluate whether the students could benefit from IDS or to help the corporate contractor design a better curriculum. If for comparison, however, I am sure the IDS students outperformed my students on the tests.
The document at:
http://civiccommittee.org/Still%20Left%20Behind%20v2.pdf
...includes some interesting perspectives on disaggregating the data from the selective schools.
The efforts at the selective schools should be applauded - they're doing a nice job inside their walls. At the same time, though, they are increasing the gap by ensuring that very little academic talent will remain in the neighborhood schools that serve 72% high schoolers in CPS.
To Ms. Karp - Nice article. If somebody is getting defensive, you must be doing something right.
And a question - Is there a connection between these struggles and failed reforms and the district's staunch refusal to hire educators to lead it? After reading the Chicago Magazine article, I'm impressed by Mr. Huberman's history, but I have a hard time believing that we can't identify a candidate with a background in school administration and proven success in school reform.
viewpointchicago@yahoo.com
If you want to improve schools without the smoke and mirrors of Ren 2010 (charter schools) Read the technical report published by the National Staff Development Council on what works in real world class schools!
http://www.srnleads.org/resources/publications/nsdc.html
Your guidance to me u*in this process will be signifant for the advancement of the work. First, i would like to ask you to provide me with the model plan for such work.
Thanks.
Regards,
John MAKI LONE
Second Graduate
student at National
Pedagogical University
of Kinshasa/DRC.
Your guidance to me u*in this process will be signifant for the advancement of the work. First, i would like to ask you to provide me with the model plan for such work.
Thanks.
Regards,
John MAKI LONE
Second Graduate
student at National
Pedagogical University
of Kinshasa/DRC.
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Catalyst-Chicago reserves the right to delete or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Reader comments are limited to 500 words.


Digg
Del.icio.us
Mail

