Become a Catalyst member

Join the conversation

We encourage our readers to leave comments and engage in dialogue about our stories. But before you do, please check out our "rules of the road."

Subscribe to catalyst-chicago.org by e-mail

catalyst-chicago.org feeds

Current Issue

School closings

As CPS prepares to close a record number of schools, the fate of students and communities is in question.

In the News: CPS moves fuel teacher 'angst'

Chicago Teachers Union will hold a news conference this morning to discuss "the growing angst among thousands of  teachers and paraprofessionals due to schools’ CEO Jean-Claude Brizard’s and the Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s troubling education agenda that will have an adverse impact on students," according to a press release issued Wednesday afternoon.

“As a classroom teacher with over two decades of experience I empathize with those who feel as if this City has declared war on its teachers who’ve dedicate their lives to teaching children and are now left wondering what they have done to be treated like this,” Karen GJ Lewis, union president said. The news conference takes place at 11 a.m. at the union's headquarters in the Merchandise Mart.

While the Tribune gives CPS a solid B+ with an A for effort on its new teacher evaluation system, it also urges CPS to count student growth as half of a teacher's evaluation, not 25 percent as the new evaluation has sanctioned.

The Chicago Teachers Union says internal polling shows there is support for a strike if contract talks with Chicago Public Schools break down, the Tribune reports.

HB 5826 introduced by Rep. Linda Chapa LaVia, D-Aurora removes a requirement for school districts with fewer than 50,000 students (all but CPS) to submit a plan each fall for how they will use supplementary General State Act funds, so-called poverty grant, to improve academic achievements of disadvantaged students.

School districts—from Mokena's Summit Hill School District 161 to districts in Naperville and Wilmette—are grappling with adding hours to their kindergarten programs, part of a growing movement to strengthen the early years as the foundation for lifelong learning, the Tribune reports.

IN THE STATE
State pension director Dick Ingram says the Illinois Teachers Retirement System could be insolvent by 2029.

IN THE NATION
Detroit Public Schools is creating a hybrid system within the district by converting 10 high schools into "self-governing" buildings with a five-member board controlling the budget, operations and hiring.

The Houston Independent School District was named Wednesday by The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation as one of four urban school districts in the country as a finalist for the 2012 Broad Prize. The other finalists this year are: Corona-Norco Unified School District in Riverside County, Calif., Miami-Dade County Public Schools, and The School District of Palm Beach County, Fla. The winner of the 2012 Broad Prize will be announced Oct. 23. Houston's district's African-American graduation rate improved faster than in other urban districts nationally, according a Broad Foundation press release.

Los Angeles City Council members suggested Wednesday they would consider changes but not a wholesale redrawing of proposed new election-district maps for the Los Angeles Board of Education. (Los Angeles Times)

Joel I. Klein and Michelle Rhee, the former schools chancellors in New York and Washington, have formed a statewide political group in New York with an eye toward being a counterweight to the powerful teachers’ union in the 2013 mayoral election. On the board are some of the most well-known and polarizing figures in public education, including Ms. Rhee; Mr. Klein, now a News Corporation executive; and Eva S. Moskowitz, the former councilwoman who now runs a chain of charter schools. Also on the board are former Mayor Edward I. Koch; Geoffrey Canada, the founder of the Harlem Children’s Zone organization, a network of charter schools; and a number of venture capitalists and hedge fund managers, who have served as the movement’s financial backers.  (The New York Times)

6 comments

Rosita Chatonda wrote 1 year 6 weeks ago

STRKE?

If the CTU can muster up 75% of the membership for a strike, what do they have in pale tom insure that teachers WILL have a job after the strike? With seniority out of the window because of Senate Bill 7. Will veteran teachers returning to work just receive low teacher evaluations at the discretion of inexperienced novice administrator? With over 170 veteran knowledgeable principals taking retirement, what post-strike environment will teachers face? Do the unions really care about the welfare of the teachers or are they just trying the preserve the union? Will the CTU just bump up it';s charter school organizing campaign to get their membership up after the strike? After all new novice teachers pay the same union dues as older veterans. Teachers need to think. This is a dirty game and teachers and students are the victims of this tug of war between the CTU and CPS.

Rosita Chatonda wrote 1 year 6 weeks ago

STRIKE? I guess I need to hit the preview button!

If the CTU can muster up 75% of the membership for a strike, what do they have in place to insure that teachers WILL have a job after the strike? With seniority out of the window because of Senate Bill 7. Will veteran teachers returning to work just receive low teacher evaluations at the discretion of inexperienced novice administrator? With over 170 veteran knowledgeable principals taking retirement, what post-strike environment will teachers face? Do the unions really care about the welfare of the teachers or are they just trying the preserve the union? Will the CTU just bump up it';s charter school organizing campaign to get their membership up after the strike? After all new novice teachers pay the same union dues as older veterans. Teachers need to think. This is a dirty game and teachers and students are the victims of this tug of war between the CTU and CPS.

Anonymous wrote 1 year 6 weeks ago

Strike

There are always people who worry about what will happen if we do strike. Going back to the 80s, the same concerns were voiced. The fact is, CPS cannot replace 30K teachers. They are hard pressed to replace the over 150 Principals that are retiring in June. What we DO know is what we will happen if we DON'T strike : longer days with less pay, less seniority rights than we have even now ( which is minimal), larger class size, evaluations that include student performance and students rating their teachers, loss of sick days ( accumulation), etc... You are going to have to weigh a certainty of lost rights over the possibility that it will be worse after a strike. But just so you know, it was NEVER worse after a strike in the past. And some years we had much less parental support than we have now ( CPS has angered a LOT of people recently ! ) .
Yes, it is scary to strike ( I was there in the 80s) and you need to financially prepare yourself as well as you can. BUT more scary is to give in, let them play this "no money" game they have always played, and let them take every right away from teachers . You stand up and fight or you lay down and lose. That's your choice in a nutshell.

me wrote 1 year 6 weeks ago

Rahm

I love the way rahm talks about "its about the children...teachers should be thinking about the children not striking". this is easy to say when no one is threating your livelyhood. The man, i am sure, is a multimillionire. He has no concept what it's like to live on 2% raise in this city. He is very our of touch? BTW where is our beloved Mr. Obama? I thought he cared about the working class?

Rosita Chatonda wrote 1 year 6 weeks ago

RE: STRIKE

I was for a strike in July 2010 when CPS fired approximately 1300 tenured Lead Teachers and Coaches refusing to put them in the re-assignment pool. I was for a strike before the Illinois unions negotiated away seniority as it was previously known, the longer school day and working condition for teachers. The only thing that is left that we can legally strike for is salaries and wages , which we won't get because CPS will declare a fiscal emergency. or say that they are not financially solvent enough to accommodate raises.

There was absolutely NO foresight given to this thought of strike . Also remember that when Jackie Vaughn was on strike there we NO CHARTER SCHOOLS, for parents to run to.

Anonymous wrote 1 year 5 weeks ago

If you plan on staying in the

If you plan on staying in the classroom as a teacher, then you absolutely must support a strike. The reforms being pushed are a radical return to the early 20th century. Teaching in Chicago is already difficult enough. The working conditions are already challenging enough. These reforms make teaching even more difficult, and even worse they will inevitably fail. They will improve nothing, only make harm all stakeholders. Again, if you value teaching, you have to wholeheartedly support a strike and encourage other teachers to support a strike. M-Rahm & Brizard don't care whether their reform agenda ultimately improves student learning. They will consider themselves successful if they can simply implement their plan, because they won't be around for the long term effect. The last strike was in 1987. It's time to stand up for teaching.

Add your comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
go here for more