catalyst-chicago.org feeds

Current Issue

Special Education

Even as CPS opens more new schools, children with special needs have a tougher time finding options. Placements in private therapeutic schools are scarce, and some charters are reluctant to enroll them.

Union challenges CPS' Do Not Hire list

Former Washington High School special education teacher Anne Daily left
the suburbs to teach in Chicago. But now her career in the district is
in jeopardy. Daily could join the dozens of probationary teachers who
ended up on the district’s “Do Not Hire” list due to firings and
negative evaluations. Former Washington High School special education teacher Anne Daily left the suburbs to teach in Chicago. But now her career in the district is in jeopardy. Daily could join the dozens of probationary teachers who ended up on the district’s “Do Not Hire” list due to firings and negative evaluations.

At the end of the 2010-11 school year, about 50 non-tenured teachers landed on the list after either failing two times to have their contract renewed or receiving an unsatisfactory evaluation.

Non-renewal is not necessarily an indication of a teacher’s job performance, since probationary teachers can end up not being renewed regardless of their evaluation. Critics say the policy also gives individual principals too much power to ruin a teacher’s career with one negative evaluation, as in Daily’s case.

Now, the Chicago Teachers Union is fighting the policy. Initially, the union filed a grievance on behalf of the affected teachers, but CPS denied the union’s request for arbitration. So the union has filed an unfair labor practices charge before the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board, asserting the policy violates the union contract. Following a hearing, the CTU is waiting for a decision from the board on its request to force the district into arbitration over the matter.

“Teachers should get a chance to present their side of the situation,” says CTU staff coordinator Jackson Potter.

The union is challenging the policy in three areas, Potter says:

  • Last year, affected teachers were not notified they were on the list, Potter says. The contract requires that teachers be sent dated copies of any negative documents placed in their personnel files.
  • The district’s action was a change from what CPS has done in the past. The union’s contract allows it to file grievances when the district violates “past practice,” Potter says.
  • The policy was implemented “ex post facto,” Potter says, with teachers unaware that their past evaluations and non-renewals would put them on the list, even if those non-renewals happened before the policy was implemented June 3.

In one case, Potter says, a teacher was non-renewed twice by the same principal. The first time it happened, the principal changed her mind, but the firing stayed on the teacher’s record.

“If the district has this blunt instrument, applying these policies in a uniform fashion without considering the details around how an individual member has gotten into this predicament, there’s no way for them to rectify the situation when it’s done in an unfair fashion,” Potter says.

Joseph McDermott, the high school member coordinator and municipal political coordinator for the CTU, says that most of the probationary teachers who are on the list are there because a principal didn’t renew them.

 

“I can tell you that non-tenured teachers are terrified,” Daily says.

After teaching high school history and junior high classes for four years outside the district,

Daily, now 36, decided to go back to school at Xavier University for a special education credential.

“I knew that I wanted to be a teacher since I was a little girl,” Daily says. “This is all I ever wanted to do with my life, and I’m good at it, and I like it.”

Before she was fired, she says, she was observed by both of the assistant principals at her school and received positive feedback, as well as an excellent evaluation from the principal.

But when Daily voiced her concerns about how another teacher was treating special education students, things began to change, she says. That teacher is on the local school council.

“It became very clear to me that [the principal] was not there to protect her students but to protect the LSC member and her own job,” Daily says. “Her contract was up for renewal.”

She claims Washington High School Principal Florence Gonzales targeted her for repeat observations and docked her for issues that were not her responsibility – for instance, the setup of a bulletin board in a general education teacher’s classroom. (Gonzales did not return phone messages asking about Daily).

In one instance, she was criticized for allowing a student without an ID to stay in class, Daily says. In another case, she was penalized for sending a student without an ID to the office.

McDermott says the do-not-hire rules offer little protection for teachers in cases where a principal treats them unfairly. “It has become a union issue, but I think it’s more than just a union issue,” he says. “Principals in some cases exert so much authority.”

In Daily’s case, one grievance – alleging that the principal harassed her – is waiting on a hearing with the Board of Education. A second – alleging that proper dismissal procedures weren’t followed – is waiting on a hearing with the principal. The district has also opened an investigation into the matter, which could provide Daily with some recourse.

Normally, when grievances aren’t decided in the union’s favor, the union can demand arbitration, which occasionally results in teachers getting their jobs back.

Even if Daily prevails in the end, she doesn’t know how she is going to support her 20-month-old daughter.

“I think I lost a lot of faith in people,” Daily says. “I always believed that the students come first and apparently that’s not the situation. It really saddens me.”

11 comments

CPSteacher wrote 42 weeks 1 day ago

Union challenges CPS' Do Not Hire list

The bigger issue in my mind is that when a position is closed for lack of funds (happens to tons of arts and music teachers) it counts as a non-renewal. So if a teacher accepts two positions that get closed out because of funding then their CPS career is over. Think about all the positions closed out this year. My school lost one in almost every department. The ones who's lost their jobs are the non tenured, and now they all have one strike (out of two) against them, through no fault of their own.

2 strikes you're out wrote 42 weeks 1 day ago

Union challenges CPS' Do Not Hire list

A probationary/non-tenured teacher who loses a job because his or her position is eliminated entirely gets a strike against them? That makes no sense. Is that really what the SB7 legislation says? Or is that how CPS has chosen to interpret a non-renewal based on a closing position? It still doesn't make sense. That's ridiculous.

Question wrote 42 weeks 1 day ago

Union challenges CPS' Do Not Hire list

Are non-tenured teachers who are not renewed due to budget cuts given a strike against them?

CPSteacher wrote 42 weeks 1 day ago

Union challenges CPS' Do Not Hire list

The bigger issue in my mind is that when a position is closed for lack of funds (happens to tons of arts and music teachers) it counts as a non-renewal. So if a teacher accepts two positions that get closed out because of funding then their CPS career is over. Think about all the positions closed out this year. My school lost one in almost every department. The ones who's lost their jobs are the non tenured, and now they all have one strike (out of two) against them, through no fault of their own.

Interesting wrote 42 weeks 1 day ago

Union challenges CPS' Do Not Hire list

Last year my principal let go several non-tenured teachers due to closing of positions. The positions opened back up when our enrollment was higher than what CPS predicted. (CPS lowballs their predicted enrollment figures for our school every year by 10-15% for the last 10 years.)

The principal has done the same thing this year with many of those same teachers, expecting to hire them back when our enrollment is the same as it's been for 10 years. I wonder, will he be able to hire them back this time? They'll have been non-renewed twice.

Celsogarcia@mail.com wrote 42 weeks 1 day ago

NYC is the same.

I am glad the union in chicago is challenging the use of do not call list. In NYC this is happening also however the union is not fighting it openly nd is not Puting the spotlight on the practice. Teachers are having their probation extended and the urging of the mayor. Those teacher that oppose their ratings are terminated and placed on the do not hire list. Principals have been given all this power of reviewing teachers without any checks and balances. Their word is final and all the union can do is file paperwork to challenge the decision which is usually sustained. The system is stacked against teachers thats why most young teachers will not speak out and are thus silenced.

Kp wrote 42 weeks 1 day ago

Union challenges CPS' Do Not Hire list

What are these school systems going to do for teachers when the economy does turn around? What 20 something in there right mind would tolerate such shabby treatment. The reason schools are in the situation with so many dregs teaching is because when times were good no one wanted to teach to little pay and too much abuse. Well all school superintendents enjoy your power now because only in the land of the blind is the one eyed man king.

Kp wrote 42 weeks 1 day ago

Union challenges CPS' Do Not Hire list

What are these school systems going to do for teachers when the economy does turn around? What 20 something in there right mind would tolerate such shabby treatment. The reason schools are in the situation with so many dregs teaching is because when times were good no one wanted to teach to little pay and too much abuse. Well all school superintendents enjoy your power now because only in the land of the blind is the one eyed man king.

Chris wrote 42 weeks 1 day ago

Union challenges CPS' Do Not Hire list

Chicago Public Schools employees involved in legal actions against the Board received on the first class e mail system different designations than others.
Officially,they are not on the DNH list,but practically they were blocked from employment,including teacher scored 100/100 on the TeacherFit assessment.

Karen Gustafson wrote 42 weeks 12 hours ago

Accuracy of Figure of Teachers Affected by the Policy

I question the figure of only 50 teachers being affected by this policy. What is that figure based on? The number of grievances filed? If so, I do not believe the number to be accurate. One of the many problems with the "do not hire" designation is that there was no notice given to the affected teachers. I surmise that many teachers were placed on the "dnh" list and were unaware because they chose to not pursue further employment with CPS.

HHIMF List wrote 42 weeks 1 hour ago

Union challenges CPS' Do Not Hire list

How many teachers got jobs and kept their jobs becuae they where on the (HHIMF) Hire Him Iits My Friend List?? Serioulsy? We lost 3 good teachers because our Principle needed to get them out of the way so he could keep another Principals daughter??????

I love the way CPS says it wants what is best for the chldren read the stuff about the CPS School Board, Heberman's two cars, DNH List??? Its insane....they need to admit their faults and go on! Most comapnies try to keep at least an appearence of caring for their employees. CPS seems to go out of their way to hurt teachers. Without the ability to strike teachers would be screwed (hold on we los that too!!!)

Add your comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
go here for more