As CPS prepares to close a record number of schools, the fate of students and communities is in question.
Join the conversation
We encourage our readers to leave comments and engage in dialogue about our stories. But before you do, please check out our "rules of the road."
Current Issue
At AUSL, progress but ‘this is not magic’
Charts
If ever there was a superstar principal, it’s Angel Turner.
When Turner took over Morton Elementary School as an Academy for Urban School Leadership turnaround principal, it was one of the worst schools in the district. Now, three years later, it is in the middle of the pack: The percentage of students meeting or exceeding state standards has increased by more than 30 points.Turner’s success helped set the stage for the Chicago Public Schools leadership to propose another 10 turnarounds next year—the most ever proposed for a single year—with six of them managed by the non-profit Academy for Urban School Leadership.
CPS trumpeted its plans with a press release that praised AUSL. “In 2011, student growth in ISAT composite scores at AUSL elementary schools (8%) was more than double the district in average growth (3.8%),” the release stated.
The AUSL model has made true believers out of not just CPS officials, but those at the top of the education ladder. When President-Elect Barack Obama announced he was bringing CEO Arne Duncan to Washington D.C., he made the announcement at Dodge Elementary, an AUSL teacher training academy. As Secretary of Education, Duncan has praised AUSL and pushed the turnaround strategy, providing hefty federal grants for districts that undertake them.
Other districts are now studying the AUSL turnaround model, in which a new principal and a cadre of new, enthusiastic staff are brought in and given intensive professional development and a plethora of material and resources. Most classrooms get an extra hand, an AUSL teacher-resident, to help with small-group lessons.
Recently, Mayor Rahm Emanuel noted that Los Angeles school leaders are preparing to use AUSL’s model there. “It is no secret that I am a zealot about AUSL,” Emanuel said at a media event designed to sell the district’s latest turnaround plan.
A long-anticipated report from the Consortium on Chicago School Research that district officials say will be released soon will likely provide a more detailed glimpse into AUSL’s performance.
A Catalyst Chicago analysis, meanwhile, shows the district’s portrayal of AUSL is incomplete. Though officials like to say that AUSL achieves quick results and that they can’t wait for the targeted schools to improve on their own, closer scrutiny reveals a more complex picture that reveals how difficult it is to make substantial progress at low-achieving schools.
* * *
AUSL has had to confront skepticism, at least initially, from parents and residents in the impoverished African American communities that so far have been the targets for turnarounds. These skeptics question an outside group coming in to take over their schools, and wonder if the schools could make similar progress if the district provided the same infusion of money that comes with a turnaround. They also worry about losing teachers with whom students have formed relationships.
“Why can they give money to a private company if they can’t give it to us currently? Is this the only company that can do this work? Why can’t they train people from the community to be part of this?” asked Casals parent Elisa Nigaglioni at a hearing on the proposed turnaround of Casals.
“We want to be in partnership with CPS. If you want to help somebody, one of the things you have to do is ask them what they want, not impose it upon them,” she added.
But on average, the AUSL turnaround schools are outperforming neighborhood schools on state tests. However, only half of the 10 are performing substantially better. And some neighborhood schools that have not gotten the same resources are gaining ground at a similar clip. (See graphics on school performance)
And whether progress can be sustained is an unanswered question. The school that appears to be struggling the most, Sherman, is the turnaround that AUSL has been working with the longest. The school’s test scores rose between 2006 and 2009, the first few years of the turnaround, but have only inched up, or fallen, since then. Especially alarming: only 44 percent of 3rd, 4th and 5th graders met standards in reading in 2011, and these are students who have been at Sherman since AUSL took over.
Sustainability is a concern because in theory, AUSL is supposed to work its magic and then turn the school back to the district.
But last year—when the district’s first five-year contract expired—AUSL asked and got another year at Sherman, located on the South Side in New City. The one-year extension is for $170,000.
AUSL Executive Director Donald Feinstein says the organization felt as though it needed more time. Feinstein admits that some of the newer turnarounds, like Bradwell in South Shore, haven’t “bounced as high as we wanted.”
He points to caveats with the other schools that might temper gains. When CPS officials announced in 2009 that they wanted to turn around Dulles, their decision was based on test scores from the previous school year. At that time, only a third of Dulles’ students met state standards. But in the year before AUSL actually took over the school, test scores jumped up 15 percentage points—only to decline slightly in the first year of the turnaround. Since then, though, scores have rebounded and the most recent scores show that almost 60 percent of students at Dulles met standards.
“Dulles and Deneen are truly higher-performing than they were,” Feinstein says. “I am cautiously optimistic about them.”
Most of the gains by Dulles, Deneen and Bradwell have been in math and science. Reading gains have been less pronounced.
It is sometimes easier to make progress in math because there are better, more defined curricula in the subject, says Paul Zavitkovsky, a University of Illinois at Chicago professor and a former principal. “When it comes to reading and literacy, there are a lot more curricula and children learn in different ways,” Zavitkovsky adds.
To some degree, AUSL’s progress also stems from helping to get students “over the bubble”—that is, getting students just over the line from not meeting standards.
“As a whole in the district, there is a lot of talk about working with kids on the bubble,” says Zavitkovsky. “This is not good policy. For one thing, you don’t pay that much attention to those [students] way below or above. The way I see it, nobody wins.”
* * *
Much of what AUSL brings to schools is a better climate. Walk into one of their turnaround elementary schools and the similarities are immediately evident. Teachers are given checklists for setting up their classrooms. They must have curtains, and encouraging little quotes posted near the clocks to give students something to think about instead of watching time tick away.
As CPS schools, AUSL schools must follow the CPS code of conduct. But there are some additional expectations. For one, halls are expected to be at a Level 0—perfectly quiet—and this is evident as students walk noiselessly through the hallways. When lined up for the bathroom or for lunch, they are supposed to read books.
“We don’t curse,” Turner says. “We don’t yell.”
The strict discipline also opens the door for more students to get into trouble. AUSL elementary schools have double the student misconduct rate of regular CPS elementary schools.
The rules are also a deterrent for parents whose children are not calm or studious. Morton has experienced an enrollment surge, with nearly 100 more students enrolling this year compared to last year. But Turner does her best to discourage parents whose children won’t fit in. She sits down to talk one-on-one with parents who want to transfer their child to the school, explaining the expectations. She also takes them on a tour so they can see how orderly the environment is expected to be.
“I ask the parents, ‘Is this a school that will work for your child?’ ” Turner says.
No parent has ever answered ‘No,’ she explains. But some parents have left without completing the enrollment process, and never returned.
Turner believes most children can abide by the rules without a problem. She notes that she was raised in Englewood and was an assistant principal at Collins Academy, a high school run by AUSL, before coming to Morton. Her experiences, she says, have taught her that all children can meet high expectations.
“Kids rise to the occasion,” says Turner, who trained at the University of Illinois at Chicago principal preparation program. “They are looking for structures and routines.”
Bradwell Principal Stacey Bennett says she has a similar philosophy about discipline. Problems occur when staff let down their guard, she believes.
“We have 820 students. We are one of the larger elementary schools,” she says. “In order to create a safe and orderly environment, we have to be at Level 0. We are not doing it to be hard-core.”
Bradwell’s leadership has emphasized the creation of a warm environment. Air fresheners are abundant and the smell of fresh flowers wafts through the air. There are little nooks, with cozy chairs and books, in corners and on the landings of some stairwells.
* * *
When Turner talks about the programs she has implemented at Morton, much of what she describes are standard curricula and strategies. But it's also evident that the turnarounds get good support and have overcome some of the parental skepticism.
In some grades, students stay with the same teacher for multiple years, a practice called looping. Turner also created departments in the middle grades, a strategy that is designed to better prepare students for high school by assigning them to different teachers for each subject.
“This means that you don’t have teachers [who were] trained to teach reading trying to teach math,” Turner says. “Math teachers teach math, reading teachers teach reading.”
At AUSL schools, teachers all use basal readers, which have stories calibrated to specific grade levels. It is part of a balanced literacy approach, Turner says.
Like Turner, Bennett says Bradwell is using balanced literacy and guided reading. She says the school is also trying to move toward differentiated instruction, or tailoring teaching to individual student needs. Bradwell now has a two-hour literacy block, with students spending time in small groups.
It is usually easier to raise math achievement than reading, Bennett points out. “In reading, there are so many more skills to teach.”
Turner says being part of AUSL is important because the organization responds quickly to her needs. For one, she receives usable data on student performance from a performance manager. And AUSL provides professional development based on teachers’ needs.
“I can call someone and say, ‘This is what I need,’ ” says Turner, “and they will go find the national expert on it and bring them in to work with me.”
Bennett points out that the data is used on a daily basis. At Bradwell, teachers use something called an exit ticket. After they teach a skill, they give an assessment on it. If the data from the assessment shows a student knows a skill, they are given an exit ticket. Otherwise, the teacher re-teaches it.
“Data is not about a test,” Bennett says. “It is about instruction. It guides our instruction minute by minute.”
Between the extra adults, the updated technology and resources and the orderly atmosphere, AUSL turnaround schools are attracting students.
Schools are abundant in the East Garfield Park neighborhood, seemingly on every corner. “So we are all fighting for kids,” Turner says.
Feinstein says the enrollment at several AUSL schools is going up because more students are coming back. Bradwell also has seen a growing population.
“We are bursting at the seams,” Bennett says. “Parents are happy. They believe in the turnaround.”
But she doesn’t want to oversell the progress. “We don’t have a magic wand,” she says. “This is not magic.”


thanks
Glad you are reporting on AUSL - very interesting. Thanks.
Does anyone else find it
Does anyone else find it disturbing that the principal does her best to discourage parents whose students who "won't fit in"?
Working the bubble
Early in the article, Sara Karp correctly describes my feeling about the common but counterproductive practice of "working the bubble" to push specific groups of students across the meets-standards threshold.
Unfortunately, this quote comes immediately after a paragraph which suggests that part of AUSL's success stems from getting students "over the bubble." While it may not have been Sara's intention, that sequence implies that I feel AUSL works the the bubble as an important part of its school-improvement strategy. In fact, among the AUSL schools I've worked with, I see no evidence of that. On the contrary, what I've seen at Morton, NTA, Howe and elsewhere, is a concerted effort to "pull from the top" by raising curricular expectations for all students, then making additional provisions to support those who need further review or re-teaching. The really impressive progress that has occurred at those schools has happened because students at all points on the achievement spectrum are making big gains in annual value-added . . . not just those whose scores are sitting closest to the state's very low cut-scores for meeting elementary standards
Disappearing Students
It would be interesting to have someone with the resources figure out WHY the AUSL schools seem to have so many disappearing students in the first year of turnaround and some even after. PURE (pureparents.org) have data that shows that in 5 AUSL schools, an average of 100 students PER school disappeared in the first year of turnaround. Some schools still have lower enrollment 2 - 3 years after turnaround. For instance, Morton had 395 kids in 2007, only 278 in 2008 ( 1st turnaround year) , and in 2010 rebounded slightly to 320. It makes you wonder , IF AUSL offered so many great things to the community, and kids were allowed to stay like they were promised, WHY would anyone transfer out ? OR is that not the whole story ?
Disappearing students
I'm not looking to be an apologist for AUSL here but, in fairness to Morton, high mobility has a long history there. For example, in the two years prior to AUSL's arrival at Morton (2007 & 2008), the mobility rates reported on the State Report Card were 63.5% and 67.5% respectively. Since then, the mobility rate at Morton was 56.3% in 2009, 62.1% in 2010, and 45.8% in 2011. When it comes to enrollment declines, it's important to notice that the five neighborhood schools closest to Morton (Beidler, Cather, Dett, Ryerson and Laura Ward) have also experienced enrollment declines (and, for the most part, improving student achievement) during the last several years.
Achievement gains at Morton look pretty much the same whether you only compare scores for students who were at Morton across all years tested or just compare cohorts across years without controlling for in and out migration. In my book, high rates of mobility and unstable enrollments just make the accomplishments of the Morton faculty and school community all the more impressive.
A different AUSL perspective
AUSL has gotten praise for their test scores in elementary schools. Their high-school work needs more scrutiny--especially at Orr.
I taught at Solorio Academy, AUSL's Southwest Side teacher-training academy. As I told Brian Sims, their AIO equivalent, when I decided to leave, "I agree with 'what' AUSL is doing but not with the 'how.'"
Test scores are important but so is the socialization we provide students. And AUSL does not have the cultural competence to effectively socialize students of color. Their teacher-training model is based on checklists and compliance, not on innovation or original thinking.
I wrote about their deficit-based approaches to instruction on my Chicago Now blog, The White Rhino, last summer. Here's a the link to my experience there : http://tinyurl.com/87hu6dr
I did find it disturbing,
I did find it disturbing, especially since in the very next paragraph the principal is quoted as saying that she believes all children can succeed. comparisons of AUSL and other charter and contract schools to neighborhood schools too often overlook this issue of selectivity: Even when enrollment is based on lotteries and other "objective" methods for admissions, many children who pose difficulty for these schools are somehow discouraged to attend the school in the first place or are encouraged to transfer out later. What's left, then, are the students who "fit" with the program model and objectives of raising scores, so of course their average scores are higher than at other schools. The objectives should include a commitment to helping all students succeed, but providing additional supports for those who need the most.
disapearing students, gentrification and AUSL failure
Mr. Zavitkosky,
from your statements it seems that more and more students in the area of Morton are moving out and that this explains the enrollment decline. A report a few years back showed a 1:1 ratio between big dev in an area and school closings linking Ren 2010 to gentrification plans. So it would seem that the students moving out would be those that had less resources to stay as housing prices went up. If this is the case, AUSL would not be working to improve the scores of the neediest students (which would be the point) and the "success" at Morton was not because they did something that a regular school couldn't do under the circumstances. In fact you mention that the surrounding neighborhood schools also saw gains when the poorer kids moved out. So Morton should not be used as an example of how AUSL produces success but of how reform is not targeting the neediest students (perhaps because the goal is to look like progress is being made while in fact playing out a business plan to weeken public education). I would like to see the Consortium on Chicago School Research track who AUSL is retaining in a school when they do a "turnaround" and who the kids are that don't make it back or get counceled out or pushed out through zero tolerance discipline along the way. We need to start serving those students.
Gentrification at Morton and surrounding schools?
Like Anonymous, I get annoyed at school organizations that claim to be improving school quality for kids from low-income households when what they're really all about is attracting and serving kids from more privileged circumstances. The thing is, it's hard to make that accusation stick when it comes to Morton or other schools in the surrounding area.
Among the six schools I mentioned in my last post, the school in 2011 with the smallest percentage of students from low-income households was Laura Ward . . . at 98.2%. Three schools, one of which was Morton, had 100% low-income enrollments. These are not gentrifying schools.
There's plenty to be skeptical about when it comes who got best served by Renaissance 2010, and the role that money and privilege have played in decisions about our schools. That shouldn't stop us from giving credit where credit's due. When you visit Morton, what you see are powerful improvements in instructional effectiveness that have translated into large gains in student achievement. That happened the old fashion way. Parents, faculty, staff and school leaders rolled up their sleeves and worked really hard to do better by their kids. I say congratulations to Morton and every other school that digs in and learns how to serve their kids and community better, whatever the political label is that we attach to them.
Success
AUSL? Amazing!
How good are they? AUSL raised student test scores before they even had the chance to teach the students. This is the type of proven education reform that we can all believe in.
From Catalyst:
"At Morton and Howe - the two highest-performing AUSL turnaround schools - students at the schools in the fall of the first year of the turnaround had significantly higher reading performance than students from the prior, according to the Consortium."
I actually like many of the things tha tAUSL does and is about. And I am patient enough to want to see slow incremental growth, not gangbuster breakthroughs. But I just can't stomach the wild claims of dramatic success when I continue to learn about these types of "improvements".
Wild claims of academic success
Curioser makes a really good point about how failing to control for changes in student enrollments from one year to the next opens the door to all sorts of distortions. What happens if we're not really vigilant about that and lots of other ways that numbers get distorted? Think of the Consortium's Three Eras study which told us that twenty years of highly-publicized citywide gains at grades 3 through 8 were mostly just smoke and mirrors.
The good news at Morton and Howe is that, after you control for changes in student enrollment by tracking same-student achievement from one year the next, you still get very strong gains at Howe starting in Year 1, and at Morton starting in Year 2. Does that make the case for turnarounds as a whole? Clearly not. Does it tell us that something important and real has happened for kids and the school community at Howe and Morton? Yes it does.
Tomato/Tomahto
Interesting that when neighborhood schools have made many of the same observations about the difficulties in making academic progress, those observations are called "excuses", but when AUSL has the same problems, they are called "caveats".
In fact the only thing a few of the AUSL schools demonstrate is that "some" of their students did a little better on a standardized test. Why is Sherman lagging after five years of efforts? I thought the point of AUSL is that it works at all of its schools because of what Mayor Emanuel calls the "special sauce". We know what the special sauce is: screening students in, working the bubble, and pushing students out. What school wouldn't make progess with that special recipe?
I teach...
I also teach at an Ausl school. There are plenty of things that occur at my school I don't agree with, but I am young, non-tenured and was desperate for a teaching job after subbing for two years.
When I read articles about selecting student populations, small class sizes, tons of resources, I wonder which Ausl schools they are talking about. Not mine! I have 34 students in my full day kindergarten. Most of the things I use in my classroom, I purchased myself or wrote grants for (guided reading books, crayons, glue, UNIFORMS for my students, paper, furniture.). There is only one teacher in my room- me. At training academies there are 2-3 teachers, but really, it is one experienced teacher and then a student teacher learning the ropes.
We do have more security guards than a typical CPS school. This is true. They work with the 5-8h graders. And as far as being tough or pushing kids out or not letting them in... We really are all on the same page about wanting students to get more out of school and life. And even at 34 students, I can expect to get more, my principal told me, because 35 is the limit and if they live in boundaries, we have to take em. (limit really is 28.....)
I teach...
There is a high sense of insecurity at our school as our principal trolls the building looking for a reason to write you up for somethig you missed on the Ausl checklist. I have to script my lesson plans for every subject. Students must be absolutely silent during transitions. Silent but also learning as I monitor bathroom users and lead some sort of activity to students waiting in line. I am at work from 7:30 to 6pm most days. I get emails saying we are not doing enough for our kids... And to prepare them for ISAT...
My connection with AUSL
I have been a teacher of CPS schools for almost ten years. After being home for four years, I returned to the classroom during the worst of times (January 2010) when there were so many position cuts and teachers out of a job. I sent out resumes, made phone calls, and even filled out an application for an AUSL teaching position. After going through 2/3rd of the way through the application process, I stopped. I was not going to be part of an AUSL school. Instead I ended up taking a temporary position at Marquettte School, a school who was literally starved and set up for failure. I had three different principals in 1 year alone and there were major cuts to positions, staff, and resources. Now, Marquette has been promised to AUSL.
I had been familiar with AUSL since their inception and had initial positive thoughts about their approach. A close friend of mine went through the program and became an AUSL teacher and within a couple years voiced out her disapproval. Needless to say, I am not in support of AUSL. The intention may be good but the approach is not. In the last 9 years, they have been given 12 schools to turn around and now this year alone promised an additional 6. That is a huge but not surprising number because a few of the Board of Education members are AUSL affiliates and supporters. AUSL has exponentially increased their funding and have big names supporting them (Gates, Koldykes, and Pritzkers to name a few).
The reality is that AUSL schools are not the ideal teaching settings for teachers or learning environment for students. AUSL is an alternative teaching program and although I have seen teachers from other careers do an amazing job, most do not remain in teaching. The retention rate is bad. The reality is that the climate changes to that of a military school where there is zero tolerance on noise and misbehavior, which leads to a record number of suspensions and expulsions. The at-risk students are pushed out which results in a slight increase (if any) in test scores, and major change in climate. Teachers are required to abide by strict rules, use a so-called checklist, and are worried about whether or not they will have their job in the spring because as I read, all new hires will be notified every May if they will be invited back.
AUSL overlooks the importance of incorporating curriculum that respects or validates students’ culture. To do that, teachers need to have cultural competence and have a genuine interest and care for the academic and social well being of all their students, regardless of race. That means staying in the school for the long run, meeting whole child, and helping at risk student population and not giving them the boot. That is just the start.
Add your comment