Change In How Bilingual Teachers Are Assigned A friend of the site sent in this email from bilingual ed, which seems to be saying that AIOs will assign bilinguals rather than having them hired directly by schools. Is that right? Is that legal? Why are they making the change?
Contact Name: Pat Fassos and Ovidio Villarreal
Contact Phone: 773-553-1930
Department: Language and Cultural Education
Summary:
The Office of Language and Cultural Education will be
supporting Bilingual Summer Programs for English
Language Learners (ELLs) who in Fall 2008 will either
continue in transitional bilingual education or
transition into the general program of instruction.
Complete Text:
In collaboration with the Office of Elementary Areas
and Schools, the Office of Language and Cultural
Education will be supporting Bilingual Summer Programs
for English Language Learners (ELLs) who in Fall 2008
will either continue in transitional bilingual
education or transition into the general program of
instruction.
In the past, positions for these programs were given
directly to schools. This year positions will be given
to the Areas to assign to schools. Details regarding
this process will be forthcoming.
Please note that ELLs in benchmark grades who do not
meet the promotion criteria (academics and attendance)
must to the bridge designated elementary and high
schools.
The problem that this is conceivably designed to solve is uneven ESL/ELL enrollment across schools in a single building. When the bilingual teacher is assigned to only one out of say four schools in a building, then Barron wants to be able to order the teacher to serve all the students in the building. This has actually been implemented through sheer force and terror despite state law. Now there is this rule change to support it, though it too seems to be a violation of the law.
Of course, it's totally unworkable because schools don't schedule together and good bilingual teachers simply quit such impossible positions. Instead of serving students in one school well, this policy results in poor service to all the students in a building.
(by the way, Don J, I think your other recent post about Little Village was too harsh. I was just over there recently and for all its problems, as far as I can see LVLHS still beats the pants off every other neighborhood high school in the city in every respect, from building cleanliness to keeping kids in school. Maybe you are too close in to know how good you all have it over there.)
All that said, I can definitely concur with your concern regarding the effectiveness of a teacher serving four schools; even if they are all in the same building. Next, it will be four schools around the region.
There are a lot of city wide teachers, special ed itinerant, clinicians and more, so that practice is probably legal, just not the best practice. Keep us posted on how this progresses.
The more the students of CPS need, the less they get. Hiring more staff across all disciplines instead of stretching those who are already on board sounds like it would be a better solution.
Although, OLC should be sanctioned by the feds for doing this.
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. District 299 reserves the right to delete or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Reader comments are limited to 500 words.





Digg
Del.icio.us