What Happened At Today's Delegates Meeting?
Today is the big day for the CTU delegates meeting, and I can't wait to hear what happens -- what's discussed, what motions are offered or rebuffed, and what if any new information comes out from the proceedings. Longtime CTU members are distressed with the dysfunction within the union leadership (though much the same is happening in the District of Columbia, it's worth noting). Rank and file members are wondering WTF is going on and feeling like there's not enough leadership on key issues like jobs, wages, school closings, and the like. So tell us what happened if you were there.
The budget is an absolute mess, they won't release a specific line item budget, Marilyn Stewart's only expense (apparently) that she submits to the Union for reimbursement is for her cell phone, for the last 8 years no one noticed the money that was being drained from the budget--averaging by my rough calculations over a million bucks a year for the last 7 or 8 years.
Almost a third of the budget (over 7 million dollars) goes towards salaries and benefits for less than 50 employees, and none of them noticed that money was vanishing.
It was a pretty sad experience. I left after the second go round of questions (when an attempt to get it extended failed)...
It just amazes me that no one checks a budget of almost 30 million dollars. I'm a terrible financial manager, but I know when ten bucks is missing from my checking account, and a quarter is moved off of my dresser. No excuse for mismanagement.
Delegates received a general, generic summary of this year's budget and an equally bland proposed balanced budget for next year. A balanced budget. (Hooray. This is not the stuff of rocket science, after all.) After the meeting was adjourned, I pointed out to one of the auditing accountants who spoke to us that he provided a balanced budget proposal for next year, but neglected to make any mention of the cumulative deficit on CTU's books. I asked what that cumulative deficit was. Besides seeming totally put out by my question, he responded that he had no idea.
The AFT will be hiring what amounts to a financial advisor for the CTU starting in September since we can't seem to keep our own books straight.
Stewart and the two accountants that spoke admitted the current leadership was partially responsibility for current CTU economic woes, but by and large pinned it on previous administrations.
The question and answer session was typical - plenty of heated blathering and little substance. Meetings are never run according to Robert's Rules of Order because the President doesn't know them and the Parliamentarian, whoever that is, is ineffective.
Not nearly as exciting, interesting, or informative as I had hoped.
The Domestic partnership bill (HB4731) that the Union pushed hard for went down in flames. I can't say I'm optimistic about success with what the Union political action committee is working on now:
A) opposition to SB 2404 – which adds 40 more charter schools to Chicago’s current number;
B) opposition to SB 1956 – which adds up to 125 charter schools designated for dropouts;
C) opposition to HB 5960 – which forces “designated health care aides” to carry out student healthcare management plans, including the injection of insulin.
D) support for HB 4375 – which eliminates the city residency requirement for Chicago teachers;
E) support for HB 4915 – which establishes teacher seniority in law for Chicago teachers;
F) support for SB 2288 to increase the state income tax by 2% and provides reductions in property taxes [all to increase funding for education]
Given the Democratic nature of our legislator, it's shocking to me that A), B), and C) from above are even in the pipeline. CTU must not be bribing our politicians with enough money. Or CTU lobbyists must be doing a pretty poor job of advocacy. Or CTU's ground-level, grass roots organizing of membership action is non-existent. Or...um...all of the above.
Tom Cross, the sponsor is a Republican, not a Democrat. As a matter of fact he is the House Minority Leader.
He has been pushing this issue with the assistance of the Americans with Diabetes Association for the last five years. Every year he re-introduces it under another number.
CTU is not the only organization lobbying against this bill. CTU is lobbying against it on behalf of school employees in Chicago.
Illinois Nurses Association, Illinois Association of School Nurses, American Federation of Teachers/Healthcare Division, Pediatrics Association, IEA, are all involved in the opposition effort.
Legislators are listening so remember to call your legislator this week and explain to them that you want them to VOTE NO TO HB 5960.
Intellectually very impressive.
Gail Kauffman beautiful as usually prepared very well for the next Halloween.By the way how long people live?Unbelievable.
Completely lack of knowledge of Robert's Rules.
News- she(M.S.)is sued for lack of action by one of the closed schools(Unfair Labor practice)
Say NO to proposed budget or pay staffers and our Queen from your own pocket.Next month we will be united and vote NO to dump
budget.
Maybe you're from another country, or maybe you don't watch the news, but with an approval rating of 28%--just about everyone wants Bush gone....
If you are saying we shouldn't ask the Union officers to take a cut in pay because we don't ask the president. He makes $400,000 a year, Stewart probably makes a third of that. Is her job a third as difficult as being president of the US...I don't think so.
They say that laws are like sausage, everyone likes them but no one wants to see them get made.
What would you call something that no one wants to see get made and no one wants to eat?
Hint: M.S. is full of it.
Remember:
She has a 21% annuity to her salary.
She has an UFT salary of at least another 125K
Plus a 21% annuity on that.
We are talking at least 300K compensation packet.
Also, a balanced budget doesn't mean anything. It is what you spend. The last several budgets were balanced and then they outspent their budget.
It is sooo very cheap to post negativity under aN anonymous blog name.
You did not say that during this evenings meeting did you?
Your lack of transparency and courage speaks volumes.
The End!
All that said, remember to notify your legislator and tell them to VOTE NO TO HB 5960.
I'm not exactly a fan of Stewart, but I kept the number at a third for several reasons, I did not include any of Bush's "extras" when discussing his salary - he would probably double his salary as well, I was simply talking base...either way, both are extraordinarily overpaid.
Just like Daily.
Shut up.
I am the Boss.
Thanks for the vote count to extend the debate and all those cronies are now identified they were in the question line but for some reason did not raise their hands to extend the question time? Harm will be avoided if he does exactly as he's told by the character assumed by the con man
Why? What were you thinking? You are a meathead
Again thanks everything we expected to happen just as planned. Crazy fool!
I love it when a plan comes together.
Caio, baby!
Corruption in Local 2 (1978)
As with so many things, Marilyn and her people want to play it from both sides of the street. One the one hand, the House of Delegates three months ago passed a resolution in support of an elected school board, which Marilyn then tried to ignore (see if you can find any mention of that resolution in official documents or on the CTU website).
On the other hand, Marilyn's agenda has been scripted by Richard M. Daley and his colleagues. So... the petition for an elected school board was reportedly somewhere at Plumbers Hall on May 7, 2008, but most of the people who were at the CTU meeting at Plumbers Hall on May 7, 2008 were not made privy to the union's "support" for the elected school board.
CTU election MS 76%
Contract Vote 56%
Do the math she lost 20 points over the SUMMER!
What do you think her support is today when I tell my members that our parent unions AFT and IFT say that the problem with our finances is because we do not pay enough dues? Correct me if I am wrong, but I think this is what those two high paid hacks were saying last night.
$832.00 2006-2007
$870.36 2007-2008
$912.00 2008-2009
----------------------------
$38.36 Dues increase 07-08
$41.64 Dues Increase 08-09
$ 80 Dues increase since Stewart took office. If you do the math that is 5% per year. Hmmm lets see what was our raise again?
I know, I know I am a trouble maker.
I do not go with the flow.
I do not tow the party line.
I am sorry to say that the facts speak for themselves.
What are going to say today?
I am lying again?
That is what the IFT and AFT said last night not me!
CTU is broke because we do not pay enough dues!
Look at the facts.
20 point decrease in support
10 percent increase in dues
18 schools closed
Who are you going to blame this one on?
Come on do I here some clapping today?
Vote No! on the Budget next month and tell your delegates to do the same.
I think I heard Marilyn Stewart say that the problem with the budget started with Tom Reece. I know that she included him as well as herself in part of the equation for the problem. I also know that she specifically stated that it was not any one presiden't fault. I think there are people who want to continue this Pact vs. UPC drama for their own agendas.
Marilyn said it's time to "move 0n". I for one am ready to do just that.
You are right--there were some questions that did not get asked because people were up at the mics to make political statements not ask honest questions.
People complain that the budget was not clear enough. Perhaps you are right, but it is the same format the budget has been presented in for as far back as I can remember.
As to Dallas being a henchman for Marilyn. Dallas chooses to be a henchman all on his own.
Why did he feel he didn't need to be on the stage for most of the meeting?
Seeing as we were dealing with the budget, where was Linda? My understanding from what was said last night is that part of the job of the new comptroller will be what should have been her job. What has she been doing.
Aren't our Health premiums are based on our salary? It is exorbitant and not equitable. Consequently, this eats away on our 4% raise more because it is based on salary. The 5% increase in Union dues is based on the Union dues. Do the math.
The cost of medication is crazy and impacting the health of people nationwide. If you have ever dealt with the Board's partner Encompass I am sure you could just scream.
All that said, don't forget to call your legislator and tell them to VOTE NOT TO HB 5960.
$832.00 2006-2007
$870.36 2007-2008
$912.00 2008-2009
----------------------------
$38.36 Dues increase 07-08
$41.64 Dues Increase 08-09
How much were Union dues 5 years ago? 10? 15?
Do the officers have the same insurance?
They get and increase in pay.
We get an increase in dues.
Sounds fair to me.
Thank You
And now you say it is alright for the union to raise our dues.
Who are you working for? The Board.
Are you a union member?
You are not trying top justifying the dues increase are you?
Just making sure I get the meaning of your posts
10:38 AM
10:45 AM
I do not want to misinterpret them.
Again the way I read them is that you are saying we should not complain about a dues increase to the rank and file because....................................... can you help me out here
I do not want be called a liar.
If I am write the hacks have got so delusional that they are advocating for a dues increase for the rank and file.
WOW! Now that is news.
Please raise my dues I want to give the union more money to spend.
Lets put that out on a referendum and see what happens to your 76%.
I thought I heard them say that they fired someone and hired another at half the price because she was younger.
Isn't this age discrimination and a possible lawsuit for the employee that was fired? and aren't we supposed to be against this as a Union.
As a newer delegate I'm very dissapointed in how private all of these Union budgets, salaries, and decisions are made when it's us the members paying for them.
I stand by any of my comments, thus I post under my name. Therefore you know that I do not work for the Board, and that I am a Union member.
But for the sake of clarification I will respond. I did not pass a judgment as to whether or not anything was right or wrong. I spoke to what is. Our Union dues have increased consistently throughout all administrations over the last 75 years. That is irrefutable.
Perhaps you should go back and read my comments regarding work time instead of commenting on what you might remember. The work schedule of a union employee includes a longer work day and work year than that of most classroom teachers and/or PSRP’s. That is irrefutable.
The rise in your health care premiums has been greater than the rise in your Union dues. That is irrefutable.
Your auto, and homeowner insurance have risen.
Last year a gallon of gas was $2, a dozen eggs was $.99, a bottle of Aspirin was $1, a gallon of milk was $1.99, a loaf of bread was $.99, whole chicken was $.59 a pound, .......they call it inflation and it is happening in every aspect of our lives. Deal with it. Is it OK or right or good? It just is. That is irrefutable. And if you don't like it, you can leave. How does that work for you?
On that note, remember the state legislators need to hear from you. They are voting to increase your workload by making you manage the health of the chronically ill students in your school. There will be no increase in pay with the increased workload so that equals a PAY CUT. Write or call your legislators and tell them to VOTE NO TO HB5960.
The End!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LAS
Office staff at the mart work harder than teachers in schools.
We should be happy and content when our dues get raised on a yearly basis.
The AFT CPA said Marilym mis-spent at least $4,000,000 since taking office. That''s just the easy losses. Since Debbie left in 2004, according to the Chicago Union Teacher, there was a $5million surplus. We are now at negative $2 million. Marilyn and her buddies mis-spent, over-spent $7 million. Now we have to make up the difference for "royal"union officials who think they are entitled to fantastic perks and working conditions. They should either resign or be indicted or both. Malfeasance and misfeasance (including the auditor ) are the reasons we haven't known about the overspending.
You wrote: People complain that the budget was not clear enough. Perhaps you are right, but it is the same format the budget has been presented in for as far back as I can remember.
What sort of logic is that...where has that led us? Now the union is in debt. We're talking about a 30 million dollar a year company that doesn't produce anything...they don't sell anything. They don't have to buy inventory, their manufacturing costs don't increase, all they are is a handful of people. I know where every dime of my budget goes...I know when I spend an extra ten dollars in a month. It's easy, you make a spreadsheet, you track every dime spent, you see where your money goes.
The budget should be completely transparent, every dime of our money that gets spent should be FOR US. That's the point of the union...
As for the infighting, it's childish, immature, and stupid on BOTH sides. I've only been a delegate for five months because I was one of the few people who read the contract...and I realized how bad is sucked. I realize that our health premium is about to be upped because of the 6% clause (32-7 in the contract, p. 73-74).
I don't have a side in this idiotic fight, other than the side of my fellow teachers.
raise union dues
5-7 million debt
18 school closings
no representation
let see
let me think
its coming to me Don't Worry
oh I got it the truth
hack - a politician who belongs to a small clique that controls a political party for private rather than public ends
sanders I think you fit the bill and you even admit it.
i digress
Sorry, because I was not clear enough in my previous response. I did not mean to express that because it was that way in the past it was okay for now. I was simply trying to point out a fact. I also think it is important that Marilyn stated there would be monthly statements for the delegates to view that would show what was budgeted and what was actually spent.
If you want to quote someone do it correctly.
Refer back to my April 15, 2008 post at 11:54PM I stated "Trust me, Mrs. Evans works more hours in a week than classroom teacher work in a month". I did not speak to work load. Remember, she is away from home and that constitutes work time. Count the hours.
I might be a hack but I am not a coward about it. Blind blogging insults is cowardly. And you keep demonstrating what you really are.
If I am a hack, I am a "Hack" healthcare professional who took an oath to practice my profession faithfully and devote myself to the welfare of those committed to my care. That is my mission. That is where my energy is being used. I will continue in this vain.
The point, tell your legislator to VOTE NO to HB 5960 and SB 2799. The children in the state of Illinois deserve much more. We must work to stop this train.
The End
I see solutions for ours problems:
1.President of the union will be not allowed to use Union fund for her personal expenses.No phones ,sattellite radios,drivers,private hotel rooms,Israel trips paid from Union fund(8,000).
All legitimate expenses would be reimbursed from the Union fund subject to Treasurer approval.
2.Office workers including Field Reps should be compensated according to the Teachers /PSRP contractual salary schedule.
No perks.Compensation according to the procedure described above.
3.President MUST obey the Union Constitution and by-laws.
She can not create any new offices and assign responsibilities without previous amendment to the Constitution.
4.President of the Union MUST demonstrate fair representation.
She is a worker and she is employed by US / House of Delegates is the boss.Her duties are protect job security and serve.
She failed to perform.There is a pending charge against Marilyn Stewart because of her failure to provide legal protections to members employed at closed schools.Grievances are only one way to cover up lack of effectiveness and lack of good will as well.
The vilations of the Illinois School Code are not grievable.The further action is necessary and justified.
I hope she will resign before greater harm will be done.
The Constitution and by-laws are available on the Blog at www.coalitionsdu.org.Any question?E mail to coollaw3@yahoo.com
P.S.How about the mandatory intelligence test as a condition for employment or being installed as a Union leader?
Sound Familiar
I just had an idea
What's her last name?
A legend
And as for Kelli and the people preaching here about civility...
Can you really sit down for coffee or a union meeting at your school and explain with a straight face why that "budget" you got to bring back from the House meeting Wednesday night is so vague as to smell like a cover up?
Instead of fixing things up, UPC circled the wagons, screamed at critics, and continued the cover up into Thursday...
So Marilyn goes back to the Merchandise Mart yesterday (Thursday, May 8) after the House of Delegates meeting and immediately went into a bunch of secret meetings to continue the opacitization of all CTU financial information. (That's my neologism for "making things more opaque... Invented just for this blog).
Opacitization is now Marilyn's main objective.
Lies. And cover ups.
Since I've discussed the following with people from every "side" of this question within CTU, it's the easiest solution:
CTU should begin voluntarily filing the LM2 forms with the U.S. Department of Labor.
CTU should immediately stop trying to use some loophole in federal law to avoid the Labor Management Reporting Act requirements to disclose (i.e., make fully transparent) all of its financials.
Anyone here can Google up the LM2 for the other unions and locals that represent CPS workers. Go get the LM2 for Local 73 SEIU and you can find out that President Christine Boardman was taking home (pay plus all benefits including expenses) more than $140,000 the past couple of years, and Local73's lowly part-time researcher (me) was making a lot less than that. It's all on file, as a matter of public record, with the U.S. Department of Labor. It's called the LM2 form.
Now let's talk about big city teachers' union locals, since those guys in the suits who are hanging around CTU to clean up the books (or will it be "cover up the mess"?) know that American Federation of Teachers Local 2 (the United Federation of Teachers, New York City) files its LM2, so that when we all make nice at Navy Pier beginning July 9, everyone can know that UFT President Randi Weingarten took home (again, pay and perks) more than $240,000 per year the last couple of years.
Since Randi's going to be AFT president just in time for the next Democratic administration in Washington, she could make a suggestion that Marilyn and the boys and girls at the Mart just comply with the federal law, make everything transparent, and end all these silly evasions. Randi's done it. Christine's done it. Almost every labor leaders in the USA has done it --
Except CTU.
And the suits currently at the Mart could certainly add this to a list of things CTU has to do to make the AFT happy.
And since the AFT is co-signing Marilyn's million dollar CTU loans (along with every one of us who is a dues paying member), I have a hunch Marilyn would have to listen if AFT people told Marilyn to stop the double talking and the nit picking and just call up the feds and tell them that CTU is going to begin complying with the regulations on reporting of union finances via the LM2 forms.
Maybe Marilyn could hire someone to file the reports going back a couple of years (at least into the Lynch administration) so that the members could have some transparent stuff to meditate on as the dues continue to increase.
Or, we could continue opacitizing this stuff and covering up and bellowing.
**********primary source material verses subjective reports to teach a lesson on critical thinking*********
Here are links to the narrative given by Marilyn Stewart and the Field Rep Agreement until after the next union election.
If they freeze salaries it would be for this year?
Otherwise they would have to break the contracts.
Highly unlikely and illegal.
Use them as primary source material verses subjective reports to teach a lesson on critical thinking
CTU Office Staff Agree 07-11
CTU Budget Narrative 08-09
post does not endorse any position or political view but is intended for educational purposes
Lesson Materials
Save As
or
Save Target As
How can they determine what type of teacher I am based off 20 minutes of interviewing?
What are 3rd year PAT teachers suppose to do? I was going to receive tenure and be assured of what CPS deems job security.....Now what happens to me and the other 3rd year PAT's? I have called both CPS and the Union to find out what will happen to me if I am unable to secure a position by August. No one can give me a straight answer.Does anybody else know? Any help would be appreciated.....
Is it true that she is breaking the Union Constitution and By-laws?
The first was the lawsuit fired by Diana Scheffer, June Davis, Audrey Mae, and Jackie Vaughn's former bodyguard in 2001 against the Lynch administration, which had dismissed the plaintiffs (and many others) when it took office. That lawsuit was paid out by Marilyn Stewart's administration after Stewart took office, since the plaintiffs were UPC. To this date, CTU has not provided the members with any detailed information on those cases (including the cost of union attorneys, for example, while the cases dragged on for three years).
The second (basically a class action called "Schmidt v. CTU") is now in its final stages, with all but one of the plaintiffs paid off (and bound by a non-disclosure agreement CTU insisted upon) as of last week. I don't know the facts of the 2001 case, but the 2004 case was straight contract law. First year law school stuff.
In "Schmidt v. CTU", the court first ruled (in 2006) that the plaintiffs had a valid contract through June 30, 2005. Lawyers for the defendant CTU than raised a bunch of other issues, and delayed the case through some very expensive discovery, including depositions.
When all that was over, the judge ruled for the plaintiffs on summary judgment (back in January 2008). Since then, the only thing that's been going on is running up attorneys' fees and costs, on the one hand, and interest to each of the plaintiffs, on the other. Interest in these cases is five percent annually, compounded daily, prior to the entering of the order, and nine percent annually, compounded daily, after the order is entered.
The next court date for that case is May 14, 2008.
At the court (Circuit Court of Cook County; Daley Center), the records of the case are all public information. CTU has somehow managed not to provide the same transparency (in either the 2001 or the 2004 cases) anyone with a little time or some FOIA moxey could achieve for the past seven years.
Now it's 2008. Whether CTU should be signing contracts that extend beyond the terms of office of any administration is being discussed, but the fact is that for the past three administrations (Reece UPC; Lynch PACT; Stewart UPC) the union did sign contracts beyond the terms of office of the administration. Stewart's contracts with the field reps (the only ones I've seen, but which are on the PACT website -- although not the CTU one) go two years beyond Stewart's present term of office. Our union dues will also be paying Stewart (via her part-time "job" as IFT Secretary Treasurer) more than $100,000 per year until December 2010 (more than six months after her current term of office ends).
For here, this morning, a lot could be said, but perhaps two things need be said.
One, lawyers. Anyone who thinks that lawyers might solve this might need to rethink. The field reps have a valid (and union -- Teamster Local 743) contract. The only way pay and benefits can be reduced is by mutual agreement of both parties. If one side tries to abrogate the contract, the other side can bring the issues through grievance, arbitration, and court. Does anyone here really want to be talking about "Rodriguez v. CTU" in the same terms as this in 2011 the way we're talking about "Schmidt v. CTU" here today?
Two: transitions. When Marilyn Stewart pulled her first Donald Trump and fired me the day she took office in August 2004 ("You. You're fired!") I had assembled all of the materials I had been working on as director of school security and safety, in the mistaken idea that someone would want to make the transition. Instead, Stewart began what amounted to a scorched earth policy against not only those of us she fired, but also about half the (very successful) activities of the previous administration. All of the committees we had built up were decimated, with several (testing; leadership training; security and safety are three I know of) eliminated completely.
(Security and safety wasn't even brought into its current half life until more than a year after Stewart's people threw out all the records of what I had been doing, apparently to be able to claim -- as they tried in court -- that I had been doing nothing!).
A reasonable transition was what should have happened (very possibly, both times).
A stupid and expensive purge was what did happen (as a matter of record, both times, in 2001 and 2004).
Also remember:
Marilyn Stewart did not play Donald Trump with all the staff who were working under the contracts we enforced through Schmidt v. CTU. John Osteburg, Connee Fitch-Blanks, and others were kept working at CTU. How and why the decision to get rid of some and not others was made is not something I know at this point, but there were some provisions for transition, or something like it. And, of course, all but two of the field reps stayed on under Marilyn Stewart (the majority of them had been working covertly for UPCs return to power throughout the Lynch years).
That's enough fact for one morning. Happy meditation, shipmates.
2004 Marilyn Stewart and Ted Dallas become president and vice-president of the Chicago Teachers Union.
They inherit a budget with a surplus of over $5,000,000
They settle a lawsuit and pay three former and future employee $1,200,000.
They immediately reinstate over $1,500,000 in extra 'benefits' for all CTU employees including the officers.
2005 Marilyn Stewart and Ted Dallas increase CTU employees’ benefits by nearly $1,500,000.
CTU surplus has been reduced to $2,500,000.
2007 Marilyn Stewart and Ted Dallas continued to give additional benefits to CTU employees by $1,500,000.
CTU surplus has shrunk at approximately $1,500,000.
CTU takes out secret loans totaling $3,000,000.
2008 CTU surplus disappears. CTU takes out another loan in order to make payroll. Marilyn Stewart accuses former administrations of fiduciary irresponsibility, but still gives CTU employees $1,500,000 in excessive benefits.
CTU increases members’ dues to $912.
Let’s get it straight. The entire Stewart administration has been feeding at the trough of the Chicago Teachers Union. Starting from Day 1. The field reps and former employees demanded that they be ‘reimbursed’ for the three years lean years of the Lynch administration. Debbie cut the exorbitant perks they had been receiving and they did everything they could to sabotage her administration. During Lynch’s presidency, they had a defacto work slow down and haven’t changed.
The greed...just to point out a few of the benefits they give themselves
(Read the Agreement between the CTU and the Professional Staff [see PACT web site] - which has never been approved by the House of Delegates.)
38.5 professional staff including the officers as per CTU web site.
38.5 X $25,000 annuity = $962,500
$11,000 car allowance = $423,500
(Why do they get a car allowance, when 85% of their gas, maintenance and insurance is paid by CTU? And, furthermore, why is the car allowance pensionable?)
Summer and winter/spring break 6 hour days (14 weeks) $385,000
One week ‘BONUS’ pay: $92,548
One-week payout for 6th week of vacation: $92,548
$ 962,500 annuity
423,500 car allowance
385,000 summer hours
92,548 BONUS
92,548 ‘Extra’ vacation
+385,000 Six-hour day
Total:
$1,956,096
Marilyn told the House that she didn’t have an expense account. She meant that she didn’t have a specific amount...her expenses are unlimited!
It’s easy enough for anyone to see how Marilyn, Ted, Linda, Mary, Mark and the CTU Trustees depleted the $5,500,000 surplus Lynch left and how they need to take out loans to keep them in the style they have become accustomed to.
The CTU has a Treasurer, Financial Secretary, Trustees, accountants, bookkeepers, etc. who know exactly where the money has gone. The AFT and IFT claim the CTU needs to raise the dues! Maybe we should examine the AFT and IFT salaries and benefits!
CTU needs to cut the fat! By cutting just the six items listed above, they would save nearly $2,000,000 a year. By cutting just 5 of the underused 'professionals' another million would be saved.
No one is even talking about the clerical staff, most of who earn more than veteran teachers.
But I have a better idea...hire another 6-figure employee as a ‘comptroller’ to figure it out.
I’m available!
Marilyn is practically alone- without anybody.She must pay for a friendship.
During the House meeting only small group supports herWho they are?Only paid staffers who should be not allowed to be present there.
Now I have to say, well, we're millions in debt for this reason and this reason, and they borrowed a couple million, but you can't really see it in any of the budgets...
And then I have to answer questions like, 'How could they not know?' and all I can do is shake my head and say "I know, I know."
I've always been a confrontational sort of person, though I haven't said word one at any of the Union meetings... (I do find them extremely amusing, however). I am just amazed at people's open hypocrisy, of which there was a fantastic previously mentioned example discussed early...I want to revisit it briefly to show how idiotic, self-serving, and counterproductive some of our fellow union members can be.
Specifically it has to do with the people who remained in line to ask questions during the motion to extend the question and answer session on the budget, but did not vote to continue the motion. So you have this relatively large group of people who are in line wanting to ask "questions" about the budget. Maybe the most important budget the union has had to pass in the last couple of decades, and they are in line to ask questions, but will not vote to extend the q&a time.
What does that tell us? It tells us that they were there to stall, delay, and thwart the people who were really interested in getting information. They were to ask questions that didn't pertain to the core issues, they were to stall. And as the motion went up for vote, they didn't vote because they didn't WANT TO ASK questions, they just wanted to take time off the clock. They were selling people like me out...they were not interested in helping Union members who wanted information, they were only interested in obfuscating the truth.
I'll say it again, the union is there for US! I could probably take the job of president of the Union, keep my teaching job, coach my kids two baseball teams, cook dinner for my wife four nights a week, and balance their budget. It's called hard work, responsibility, and dedication. Not passing the buck, deception, and incompetence. We need a third Union "party"
People Helping Union Come Clean, or PHUCC.
Refer back to my April 15, 2008 post at 11:54PM I stated "Trust me, Mrs. Evans works more hours in a week than classroom teacher work in a month". I did not speak to work load. Remember, she is away from home and that constitutes work time. Count the hours.
I'm not sure exactly what this is about, BUT the idea that "away from home and that constitutes work time" is absolutely ridiculous. So is my wife's 90 minute commute each way "work time" because she is away from home? What about the time I'm working AT HOME (making tests, grading papers, doing lesson plans, having students come to my door for advice, answering their e-mails, bumping into them at Subway or CVS)...is that work time...if so, I can guarantee you that Ms. Evans doesn't know what a workday is. She can probably take a leak without permission, she doesn't have to arrange her bowel movements to occur at exactly 10:50 (or else). She also probably has the luxury of a lunch that hasn't been in a paper bag, in a fridge filled with old mustard packets and salad dressing from 2002.
She probably eats at her leisure, can use the phone when she likes, probably expenses a lot of things. So if you're going to sing this persons praises, and discuss her 6000 hour work week, that's all well and good, but don't EVER do it at the expense of a classroom teacher, a fellow union member, or me again. It makes you sound rather shallow and foolish.
Check all documents on the web site http://coalitionsdu.org including the latest Unfair Labor Practice charges.
Have a nice weekend .It is pleasure to see people who believe in basic values.
That is why they ganged up on my when I tried to make a motion of privilege.
I wanted to have all the salaried full and part time staffers removed from the house floor so they could not unduly influence the debate.
As everyone now knows they did.
For the vote next month the House of Delegates must demand to have those people removed from the house floor or have a roll call vote.
The delegates are the supreme power in the union.
They are above the anything.
IT IS IN THE CONSTITUTION!
You know they are planning how to steal the vote for to approve the budget.
They are in fact using our dues money to sit at the mart offices and plan how to work against the rank and file.
Those same dues that they say they are raising next year to $912 to cover the deficit problems and the IFT and AFT hacks play along with the fraud.
Raise our dues to fight against the rank and file who do not want their dues raised.
STEWART IS A DICTATOR!
I assume many delegates will have cell phones available to record MS’s desperate attempts to push through the budget...by any means possible.
I don't think MS is overly dishonest (can't say the same thing for the outcasts); I do think she is incompetent and easily duped. She must have actually thought she was elected because of her merits (what were the merits again, oh yes, the long serving ineffectual elementary school delegate with a deep background in special ed. for the hearing impaired). This could make her a nice person but utterly no qualities for any position of leadership; in this fact she has been consistent. She has now been cornered by the greedy economic recklessness of her team. She can try to blame the CTU near insolvency on former leadership but she’s been at the helm for four years and it has gotten much worse every year. She has no defense.
The only thing she can do (besides resign and steal away with her unearned huge retirement) is get rid of some of those useless, overpaid, over perked personnel at CTU. Why did you go to Israel? What is the catering bill? Why do we pay your annuities? Why do we pay for all of your phone bills, gas and leases for your cars, and 100% parking?
The people at CTU headquarters hit the lottery! ....how many schools were closed and how many teachers lost their jobs while you sashayed around the Mart?
How dare you plan to raise our dues!
Do you know other nursing home located close to the Plumbers Hall to accommodate her?
Settlements for June Davis, Audrey May, Diana Sheffer, and the late President Tom Reece's bodyguard totalling over $700,000.00, all agreed to by PRESIDENT MARILYN STEWART. That's OK, she didn't know what she was doing at the time.
The contracts Lynch gave to her Coordinators were given before the election she lost by less than 600 votes. Why couldn't those one year contracts be honored, then replace Lynch's people. Isn't that what we want new principals to do in schools? I WOULD SUE TOO IF I HAD A CONTRACT AND WAS FIRED! That's called a political firing.
What about that election that PRESIDENT MARILYN STEWART won by less than 600 votes in 2004? Well, if millonaire attorney Larry Poltrock didn't do legal work for the AFT, Lynch would have won the challenge. Kind of like what millonaire LARRY POLTROCK is doing now with the caucus.
Let's borrow money off our strike money that should have been used to stop school closings for the next five years. That makes a lot of sense PRESIDENT MARILYN STEWART. This is a sure fire way to keep everything going until you are ready to retire isn't it?
So how much did MARILYN STEWART save on the leasing of the mart offices. $10,000 per month or so. Sorry PRESIDENT MARILYN STEWART, the mart just wanted the CTU to stay. It was not you or your negotiating skills. It's called the changing of economic times. A little less per month is better than nothing. Drop in the bucket for the Kennedy's.
This budget problem has been ongoing for over three years. PRESIDENT MARILYN STEWART can just blame it on Linda Porter. Over FIVE MILLION lost dollars that PRESIDENT MARILYN STEWART just found out about and took Linda Porter's authority away.
CUT THE GARBAGE PRESIDENT MARILYN STEWART. YOU HAVE BEEN IN ON THE MIS-MANAGEMENT OF THE CTU THE WHOLE TIME. MAYBE YOU JUST DIDN'T UNDERSTAND, BUT THAT'S OK, YOUR JUST THE PRESIDENT!
Let's sum this up. I blame many others but myself. Maybe it is the excess staff hirings over the years. How about the lavish buffets, parties, and spreads for my patronage army, family members and friends. How about your personal "unlimited expense account" that could have ranged from $2600.00 to $10,600.00 per month all these years? Remember when she refused to answer how much her expense account was at the House Meeting? All Stewart claimed she spent last month was 1oo dollars for her cell phone. WHAT AN INSULT TO THE MEMBERSHIP!!
Try reducing unnessasary administrators. You can limit them to five.
1. Grievance 2. Security 3. Lobbyist 4. Editor 5. Quest
Well, that would probably save a few million a year. We wouldn't want to do that now would we? These individuals are your strongest supporters in these hard times.
PRESIDENT MARILYN STEWART-HARD DECISIONS, HARD TIMES!
YOUR 30 CRONIES OR YOUR 30,000 MEMBERS. LOOKS LIKE YOU HAVE ALREADY MADE YOUR CHOICE.
If Stewart gives any of her coordinators or consultants multi-year contracts, then she should be ousted for fiscal mismanagement. Show the membership you really care and get rid of your top financial supporters.
Filing a Request for an Investigation of an Attorney
By mailing to our office, either in Chicago or Springfield, a request that you want an attorney to be investigated by our office. Your request should be in writing. No special form is necessary. For your convenience, you may download a Request for Investigation form. Please return the Request by postal mail or hand-delivery. The ARDC does not accept an e-mail transmission of a Request for Investigation.
Request for Investigation Form
That's the latest "reconstitution" (although in CPS Newspeak, it's being called "turnaround" this year, since all the research shows Reconstitution has always been a failure) body count.
I've been talking with teachers and others at most of those schools the past months, and a lot of the discussion here is irrelevant to what's happening in the schools.
Why isn't someone demanding that Marilyn Stewart put some union muscle behind a protest at the May 28 Board of Education meeting and some research behind showing how the data used to screw (and slander) those six schools was a complete fraud, historically and in each of its iterations. The dramatic note that Copernicus and Fulton feed into Tilden (not Harper, as Arne was prattling on and on about during his talking points) was just the most blatant part of the lies that went into this screwing of teachers (and principals; and everyone else) on behalf of the corporate fantasylands Arne and CPS live in. Every single bit of "data" that Arne's people presented to "prove" those cases was either spun or so far out of historical context that not one of those "cases" would have stood up under cross examination.
Yet the schools and their staffs are all being screwed as Marilyn Stewart and the CTU staff hang out and plan their next floor strategy to buffalo the delegates about the budgets.
The union should be doing something. And filing grievances and talking about lawyers at this point in history is not doing anything.
Is Marilyn trying to avoid protests, pickets and Board meeting outcries because of some deal she cut on the side with Charlie Rose last August, before she railroaded that sellout contract through the August 31 House of Delegates meeting and the September 10 referendum?
Someone can investigate the lawyers later.
Right now union people are being victimized, and Marilyn Stewart is ignoring them. How much did she get for that sellout -- beyond the $100,000 (plus) job she copped at the illinois Federation of Teachers the day after her May 18 reelection?
You seem to be under the impression that the Union is supposed to help the members. I know that’s what was done when Lynch was president. She sent out teams to schools for closings, violence issues, contract violations, etc. Time and again the field reps refused to go but the directors and officers went out. Remember during that 3 year period, every school was visited at least once by an officer; many were visited more often. They kept active lists of displaced teachers and PSRPs and found them positions. Lynch required that field reps visit their assigned schools regularly for union meetings, some did, and some didn’t.
Marilyn and Ted spent 3 years telling members to prepare for a strike and neglected what was destroying public education. The ‘new’ CTU has repeatedly tried to convince the members that the contract is not enforceable and Lynch was at fault. When it was their own inaction and incompetence. They rarely answer the phone and take days to return voicemail. ( I always found it interesting when field reps call members at home at 10am on school days and leave a message; you call back when you get home and you get their voicemail again.)
Perhaps with the your help and that of Chris, Kugler, PACT, and other some good will come. This CTU has exacerbated the problems.
I remember a meeting at Sawyer Elementary School (Jackie Price Ward was holding it; she was then Recording Secretary), where Larry Laughlan (a field rep who worked for the UPC the whole time Lynch was president) didn't even know that Article 28 still had guidelines on class size in the contract. He was obviously taking a dive.
Later, I watched Dave Friedman going behind Howard Heath's back at a meeting at Kelvyn Park High School, and one time when I had a meeting at one of Friedman's schools (MacAuliffe) while I was director of security and safety, he tried to tell the members there was nothing CTU could do about gang bangers in the school. I was walking the hall with him that day at that school and saw a kid flash a notebook at another kid, and just stopped the kid and took the notebook. "LKN" was on the inside cover, and he was representing. I told the kid to pick up the notebook in the office, while the kid yelped I was picking on him, was some racist white guy, etc., etc.
My favorite was Eileen Comacho, who tried to turn security and safety into a mold and mouse hunt. True that. She spent her whole time as I was organizing the program going behind my back to people like Victor Gonzalez (now there was a piece of work) demanding that I focus "security and safety" on the "real problems" -- leaky roofs. We had gang problems then as bad as we have now, but at least we had a program for identifying the schools that had them (elementary as well as high schools) and then a program to begin to deal with them.
Yeah.
I remember. Faces and names.
When Stewart came in, she not only fired me, but her people threw out all the materials we had for security and safety, including that famous map we were using to ID the major gangs, school by schools (as well as the neutron schools). All of that stuff was dumped, and then later they tried to claim that I hadn't done any work -- until I told them that their own computer systems backed up everything every night and they could find it all on the backups.
A half hour later, that lawyer of theirs came back and had to admit that there were six CDs worth of stuff from the computer I had been using, and a lot from everyone else's.
Of course, none of that did the members any good, because not only were the offices and records wiped out by Marilyn Stewart's team, but the networks we had for dealing with those problems were destroyed, too.
First months Marilyn was in office, she purged every committee that was kept and destroyed at least a dozen functional committees (including the security and safety -- "school violence" we called it -- that I had convened with Verdell Henderson from Crane High School). We had a program going then at Crane, and it would have worked. Now we're watching the same mess four years later, and Crane makes The New York Times for violence.
Yes, I remember. Very clearly. Every mope who dogged a grievance (or worse), lied to a member, or played office politics while things got worse and worse and worse and worse...
One possible problem for all of them: Article 27 states, ”This agreement becomes effective upon ratification by the parties and shall continue until June 30, 2011. Subject to the House of Delegates authorizing the executive committee to enter into a multi-year agreement, this agreement shall be effective until June 30, 2011.
This has never even been brought to the House.
The House has never authorized it.
Whoever negotiated this should have negotiated the teacher’s contract! But then, the House never authorized that either!
1. VOTE NO on EVERYTHING THEY WANT
2.BRING YOUR CAMERA PHONES TO THE MEETINGS and be READY to TAKE PICTURES and VIDEOS. The members want to see
3. POST WHAT YOU CAN ON YOU TUBE.
4. STOP THINKING THE AFT is on YOUR SIDE. IT ISN'T. POLTROCK represents THE AFT too. AND THE IFT is a very expensive BOONDOGGLE.
5. BE READY TO BE ARRESTED.


Digg
Del.icio.us
Mail

