Got Any Ideas For Catalyst? Full letter from Catalyst:
Welcome to the new Catalyst Chicago
We at Catalyst have spent much of
the past year exploring ways to serve you and, therefore, our city’s
children better.
Our new vision is an expansive one
that is based on what more than 200 people told us in interviews, focus
groups and surveys:
- It takes more than the professional school improvement community to improve outcomes for children, so Catalyst will revise its product mix to reach more audiences.
- People want to talk about what is working, what is not working and next steps. Seen as a safe space for that discussion, Catalyst will promote a diverse, robust and constructive dialog on improving the educational experiences of our children.
- It takes more than a school to educate a child, so Catalyst will incorporate into its reporting issues in the larger community that impact children’s learning.
- Chicago is not an island, so Catalyst will establish a greater presence in the suburbs and the state capital and will work to develop a multi-city network of urban education news services.
Earlier this month, we took our first
steps towards fulfilling our new vision. We produced an in-depth special report on Chicago’s high school transformation – the
copy you are receiving today is a condensation that ran in Crain’s
Chicago Business. We then followed up with a summit that featured Chicago Public Schools CEO Arne Duncan and Washington
Post education columnist Jay Mathews. Soon we will post a report
on that gathering online to continue the conversation.
The special report that formed the
basis for this summit is a prototype of a new product aimed at leaders
in school and community change.
We also broke related high school
news stories online, signaling increased use of this medium of choice
of today’s young adults. In the future, we will use audio, video
and interactive web features to communicate still more effectively
and to share the views and experiences of our various audiences.
As we at Catalyst plunge into a new
future, we ask you to help us out. Please share your ideas and your
reactions to our efforts. We look forward to the feedback.
Best regards
Linda Lenz Veronica Anderson
Publisher Editor in Chief
I'm not speaking of just IMPACT or online gradebooks, etc. I'm speaking of real tech integration. Stories of teachers that understand that they can't overlook this and hope the next teacher handles it. Stories of teachers who make the time to improve their knowledge and really work for the kids. Teachers that see these positive stories may be motivated to become more tech savvy.
- reporting the experiences of the families who have children enrolled in CPS and other school systems - be watchdogs for students
- less reporting on programs and policies as "designed," and more reporting on programs and policies as "implemented."
- better reporting on budgets, allocations, etc.
- better reporting on race and class in education
- less unquestioning acceptance of CPS/city propaganda
- deep reporting on the experiences of special populations, such as students with disabilities, students off the college-track, high-achieving students, etc.
As a reader, I would want to believe Catalyst knows (and reports) what is happening in CPS and how it all serves (or fails) to educate Chicago children and youth. At the moment, Catalyst isn't doing that job.
But for right now, most of us have simply fallen in line, and / or have been duped, letting the "powers that be" get away with using test scores to sort not only students, but teachers and schools. And even allowing them to use the word "probation" in reference to a school, instead of keeping it in the criminal justice system where it belongs.
All that said, Catalyst could open up the world of Specialized Service and Special Education for the general public and the education professional and illustrate the great need and value of these non-teaching rolls.
Remember, If Johnny can’t breathe; Johnny can’t read.
LAS RN
PS. Wednesday, May 7th, 2008 is School Nurse Appreciation Day. You may not see her/him as much as you would like, but let your School Nurse know that you know they are appreciated.
On this day of Appreciation call your House Representative and tell them to VOTE NO TO HB5960. (www.ilga.gov)
In other words, what are schools doing to move teachers from being bad to good, from good to great or from great to amazing?
Why all the one size fits all PD?
Where is the PD that hard working staff deserve?
Probably the most useful thing Catalyst could do is revisit one or two of the major pieces of nonsense from CPS that Catalyst hyped and legitimized over the years. Basically, for more than ten years, Catalyst has been the main periodical acting as cheerleader for corporate "school reform" and the bashing of public education and public school teachers that has gone with those monstrosities both here in Chicago and (since NCLB) across this land of ours.
My own personal suggestion would be a lengthy mea culpa about "High School Intervention" back in 2000. Catalyst was basically a cheerleading squad for the pedagogical and psychometric idiocies of JoAnn Roberts and the "Intervention" team and juked all the data to help along that expensive, demeaning and ridiculous attack on the general high schools.
After finishing a complete debunking of "Intervention" from 1980 (reviewing every lie and teacher bashing trick Catalyst ran as "news" back then) Catalyst can apply the same critical eye to "High School Transformation". That's Catalyst's latest contribution to the same tradition of mindless teacher bashing union-busting nonsense.
Of course, the day that happens hell's glaciers will calve.
But since you asked, start with your own examinations of conscience and some self-criticism.


Digg
Del.icio.us
Mail

