Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing PURE is sending out notice (below) about a lawsuit being filed by a teacher (Sauganash Elementary School teacher Kathleen Williams) who says she was fired after saying she was pregnant. How do schools usually deal with teachers telling them that they're going to have a baby?[#jump#] FROM PURE December 14, 2007 CONTACT: Elaine Siegel or Matthew Pavich Elaine K. B. Siegel and Associates, 312-236-8088 Teacher sues Chicago Public Schools for discriminatory firing based on pregnancy WHAT: A lawsuit was filed today in federal court against the Chicago Public Schools for employment discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and violation of the plaintiff’s constitutional rights and the federal Family and Medical Leave Act. WHO: Sauganash Elementary School teacher Kathleen Williams, who had been given superior ratings, was cut from her position shortly after notifying the principal that she was expecting a baby. WHY: It is illegal to fire an employee because she is pregnant. The false and contradictory statements given by CPS officials for firing Ms. Williams are clearly trumped up to cover up an illegal act, and after the fact. Ms. Williams subsequently was harassed and falsely accused by school officials, incurred health insurance costs, and lost accrued sick days, pension contributions and tenure status. She wants her formerly excellent professional reputation back along with compensation for her significant losses due to CPS’s illegal acts.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20071211-9999-1m11coziahr.htmllink here
click here
What happened? These attorney's will probably do a good job, Hopefully.
They helped the Curie LSC win in arbritation and Jones is out for good.
This woman needs to get a life and move on.
This woman needs to get a life and move on.
they thrive on garbage like this. Any competent attorney would tell this woman that she has no case. If this pathetic woman's reputation has any respectability left, PURE (or more appropriately, PUCE) will completely kill it in spades with aces to spare.
I'm guessing that the teacher in question is trying to get money out of the Board since her termination happened at the time of her pregnancy. She's probably staying home raising her baby, hoping to get a windfall. Throw PURE's people into it and you've got a perfect formula ---- for disaster. Why would any level-headed person to to PURE in the first place?????
hs
Because your principal said that does not mean that the principal at Sauganash fired someone for being pregnant. Since the principal at Sauganash had children during her time as principal, that would be pretty hypocritical, don't you think? I don't believe it happened that way.
By the way, if Sauganash Elementary wants to discuss things here, why doesn't someone document the overcrowding that was brought up (again) at the Wednesday (December 19) Chicago Board of Education and the runaround (again) that Sauganash is getting from Arne Duncan and Rufus Williams. The same week where Sauganash was told "There is no money. Go to Springfield" CPS announced that it's (a) putting an addition on the Peck school and (b) building a new elementary school at the corner of Grand Ave. and Central Ave.
While there are other major construction jobs going on around the city courtesy of CPS, the other two we're tracking are (a) Austin High School's exterior rehab work (which is now being done after Austin being given the same runaround for 25 years), and (b) the huge revamping of the Grant school "campus" (from Western Ave. to Campbell at Adams St. to fit it for the two military high schools presently in the building.
The Austin and Grant school rehabs (which conservatively will have cost $30 million when they are done) are typically following the destruction of the public schools that once were in those buildings, and their replacement by privatization and militarization schemes.
Or are you of the feeling that the principal and teachers can "manage the best they can"? If this is how you feel, then shame on you!
One problem that principals are faced with is that they are in reality the front line of the school system in applying labor law to teachers and other staff. The administrative law class that is required for the IL admin certificate covers so many areas that it is in many ways useless. As in any organization the Board has a tendency to back up the administrative decisons of principals and look at the factual details only after a lawsuite has been filed.
As this blog has documented principals also have great difficulty correctly applying special education law and the school code as it relates to Local School councils. My own experience is that principals are selected for their educational leadership skills and not for their knowledge of the mulitple laws that effect public schools. A wise principal will be able to avoid legal pitfalls, but an agressive principal attempting to establish his or her authority will often make major legal errors.
So to be honest I do not understand why some of the posters were so upset by the lawsuite or the fact that PURE was involved in it. Even if the lawsuite is found not to have merit by the Court, clearly it does put school level administrators on notice that they must operate within the context of our legal structure.
As for those teachers who have commented on the fact that the teacher bringing this action against the CPS will in the end suffer because she will not be hired again, I have to say there is great truth in those comments. As George knows only too well there is indeed such a thing as a blacklist. This list of trouble making teachers is not limited to CPS, it can extend into the suburbs. I have seen special education teachers who have had major administrative conflicts have trouble being hired outside of Chicago even through there is a major special ed teachers shortage.
Rod Estvan
One problem that principals are faced with is that they are in reality the front line of the school system in applying labor law to teachers and other staff. The administrative law class that is required for the IL admin certificate covers so many areas that it is in many ways useless. As in any organization the Board has a tendency to back up the administrative decisons of principals and look at the factual details only after a lawsuite has been filed.
As this blog has documented principals also have great difficulty correctly applying special education law and the school code as it relates to Local School councils. My own experience is that principals are selected for their educational leadership skills and not for their knowledge of the mulitple laws that effect public schools. A wise principal will be able to avoid legal pitfalls, but an agressive principal attempting to establish his or her authority will often make major legal errors.
So to be honest I do not understand why some of the posters were so upset by the lawsuite or the fact that PURE was involved in it. Even if the lawsuite is found not to have merit by the Court, clearly it does put school level administrators on notice that they must operate within the context of our legal structure.
As for those teachers who have commented on the fact that the teacher bringing this action against the CPS will in the end suffer because she will not be hired again, I have to say there is great truth in those comments. As George knows only too well there is indeed such a thing as a blacklist. This list of trouble making teachers is not limited to CPS, it can extend into the suburbs. I have seen special education teachers who have had major administrative conflicts have trouble being hired outside of Chicago even through there is a major special ed teachers shortage.
Rod Estvan
Just to update that.
Despite the fact that I am a whistle blower, CPS has kept my on their DO NOT HIRE list for nine years now (February 1, 2008 will be precisely the 9th anniversary of when I was ordered to Camp Beverly from Bowen High School in Chicago, where I had been teaching English).
Despite the fact that CPS voted to stop using the CASE tests less than two years after I blew the whistle on the CASE tests as a piece of nonsense and a waste of money, the DO NOT HIRE LIST wasn't removed, even after my lawyer and I met with Patrick Rocks and an assistant on that very topic. As a result of that and other experiences (not the least of which is the waste of money for lawyers on Corey H) my conclusion has been that the Law Department at CPS should be considered the ANTILAW Department, since their main jobs (under Rocks, as under his predecessors Ruth Moscovitch and Marilyn Johnson) in the Daley Years is to make sure that both the letter and spirit of the law is violated when the power of the mayor and his minions are questions. Rocks doesn't even try to hide his smirk at Board meetings when people with reasonable complaints talk about suing the Board, because he knows the Board's strategy is to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars in public money to cynically stall any litigation -- no matter how meritorious, as in Corey H -- on behalf of his masters at Clark St. and City Hall.
Chicago's DO NOT HIRE list is honored in the suburbs. Once again this year, I've been looking for suburban teaching jobs, and even made a move to try and find them as a substitute teacher. In a couple of cases, things looked promising. Suddenly, the wall of silence descends over all conversation, and you get that sad look from people who know they are doing something craven, but have been ordered to do it and have no choice.
Yes, as the New Year dawns, Chicago's ignoble reality leers across the USA. I'm told that Paul Vallas recently hired Linda P and Johnetta J as expensive bureaucrats for his New Orleans operation, while hundreds of teachers there are still out of work, having seen Hurricane Katrina and the implementation of the "Shock Doctrine" ruin their lives and professional careers, thanks to the Bush and Daley people.
For reasons that will become clear this year, however, I'm more optimistic than recently. Daley is being called the buffoon that he's always been (most recently in yesterday's Sun-Times) and even the corporate Chicago media can sustain the coverups of the crimes of the Daley administration (remember "school reform" was only part of the three-part attack on poor, mostly black children, with "housing reform" and "welfare reform" causing damage as great as "Renaissance 2010" to thousands).
So Happy 2008, y'all.
Despite all the (typical, by the way, anonymous) ranting here against a teacher who exercised her legal rights (after having been denied them at Sauganash), the litigation moves forward. Other teachers have begun winning age discrimination cases against those schooled in Chicago's ugly schools of "data driven" principalship -- and those "above" them in chain of command. There has even been some poetic justice, as people who spent a lifetime kissing up to POWER (mostly, Daley and his minions) didn't live long enough to collect the pensions they claimed they had to lie cheat and steal to get to.
And now, in the spirit of "First they came for...", the majority of principals are facing Comstat at the hands of a guy named Bryan Samuels, who is less qualified to be a tyrant here at Chicago's schools than, bless us, Arne Duncan or Josh Edelman. There is kind of poetic justice in principals who bullied teachers facing crazed data bullying at the hands of incompetents whose pay runs into six figures, but such is life.
Yes. It was located on the upper floors of 125 S. Clark St. for a time. Now it's been dispersed, gulag like, into the area offices.
And I'm sure this "fired" and pregnant teacher is no exception. Great society we live in! The Board should be tarred and feathered for allowing this. Does the Union sanction this? Shameful!
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. District 299 reserves the right to delete or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Reader comments are limited to 500 words.





Digg
Del.icio.us