About

The opinions expressed in District 299: The Chicago Schools Blog are strictly those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Catalyst Chicago or the Community Renewal Society, its publisher.

Powered by Technorati

District299: The Chicago Schools Blog
Return To Main Blog Page
Friday, December 14, 2007
Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing PURE is sending out notice (below) about a lawsuit being filed by a teacher (Sauganash Elementary School teacher Kathleen Williams) who says she was fired after saying she was pregnant. How do schools usually deal with teachers telling them that they're going to have a baby?[#jump#] FROM PURE December 14, 2007 CONTACT: Elaine Siegel or Matthew Pavich Elaine K. B. Siegel and Associates, 312-236-8088 Teacher sues Chicago Public Schools for discriminatory firing based on pregnancy WHAT: A lawsuit was filed today in federal court against the Chicago Public Schools for employment discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and violation of the plaintiff’s constitutional rights and the federal Family and Medical Leave Act. WHO: Sauganash Elementary School teacher Kathleen Williams, who had been given superior ratings, was cut from her position shortly after notifying the principal that she was expecting a baby. WHY: It is illegal to fire an employee because she is pregnant. The false and contradictory statements given by CPS officials for firing Ms. Williams are clearly trumped up to cover up an illegal act, and after the fact. Ms. Williams subsequently was harassed and falsely accused by school officials, incurred health insurance costs, and lost accrued sick days, pension contributions and tenure status. She wants her formerly excellent professional reputation back along with compensation for her significant losses due to CPS’s illegal acts.


Comments
Fri Dec 14, 2007 at 4:07 PMBy: joe Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing CPS has done this to a lot of people but they usually get away with it because most people do not have the time, energy, or money for the long drawn out fight! GOOD LUCK! I for one hope that CPS is exposed for all their dirty tricks in firing innocent hard working people!
Sat Dec 15, 2007 at 6:25 AMBy: George N. Schmidt Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing Didn't a teacher at Lincoln Park High School just win a case against that immortal Principal, Bessie Karvelas, for the same discrimination? Details anyone?
Sat Dec 15, 2007 at 11:10 PMBy: sick of pure Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing I'm sure there's a lot more going on here than the rhetoric PURE espouses and I'm sure the truth will out.
Sun Dec 16, 2007 at 8:45 AMBy: tom Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing How many lawsuits are out there against CPS by employees/ former employees?
Sun Dec 16, 2007 at 10:06 PMBy: Elwood P. Dowd Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing The EEOC found in favor of a discharged Lincoln Park teacher against Bessie Karvelas on the pregnancy discrimination charge and retaliation. It only took 2 1/2 years to make that decision. The teacher is filing a lawsuit this week against her and CPS in federal court.
Sun Dec 16, 2007 at 10:24 PMBy: san diego teacher awarded $1M Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing a former teacher in san diego was just awarded over $1M by a jury for being discriminated against because she was pregnant -- despite being probationary and the district's questions about her performance.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20071211-9999-1m11coziahr.htmllink here
Sun Dec 16, 2007 at 10:26 PMBy: wbbm report Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing here are some more details from wbbm about the circumstances surrounding the lawsuit

click here
Mon Dec 17, 2007 at 4:24 PMBy: Pretty good attorney's Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing This is going to be a good one. These attorney's are the ones that the Curie Local School Council hired against their former principal.

What happened? These attorney's will probably do a good job, Hopefully.

They helped the Curie LSC win in arbritation and Jones is out for good.
Mon Dec 17, 2007 at 6:42 PMBy: Monica Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing Cathy Lawton, Principal at Barbara Vick, fired a teacher last year right after learning of her pregnancy, saying it was for pedogogical differences. Pleeeaaase!
Wed Dec 19, 2007 at 9:33 AMBy: a usually reliable insider tells me Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing that the sauganash principal (munn) is bev tunney's daughter -- is that right?
Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 5:09 PMBy: Larry Michaelson Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing I know tons of teachers who are pregnant, have their babies, and then return to work. There is a LOT here that is not being told. No good teacher on tenure can lose their job for simply being pregnant. I bet this teacher was low on the seniority pole and and is using her pregnancy as an excuse to get money. It's the times we live in -- imaginary discrimination based on color, religion, pregnancy, sexual orientation, ect. I think that PURE is being taken for a real ride here, but of course, they'll never admit it. If this teacher was decent, she certainly could have interviewed with another principal.
Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 5:58 PMBy: Karrita Mattei Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing Being a teacher in CPS for twenty years, I find this whole thing a little suspicious. I've had maternity leaves, and colleagues of mine at other schools have had them as well. I strongly suspect that this teacher is trying to blame someone for her losing her job, and is using her pregnancy as an excuse. I've seen this done before. If Ms. Williams wants to "restore" her reputation, a lawsuit like this is only going to make her "poison" to any principal throughout the system. I strongly suspect that she was probably a very newly assigned teacher and lost her position ------ and happened to be pregnant at the time. Something here just doesn't add up, and I bet there's a lot that is not being told.
Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 8:07 PMBy: also sick of PURE! Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing Leave it to PURE to get involved in something like this. They themselves have been pains in the --- for years and years. The "teacher" is using PURE because there probably isn't a decent attorney who'd touch this with a ten foot pole. If this lady was a competent teacher, she'd have long since found a new school and a new life, which is what she needs to do. Anyone who goes to PURE for anything has got to have rocks in their head to begin with.
This woman needs to get a life and move on.
Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 8:09 PMBy: also sick of PURE! Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing Leave it to PURE to get involved in something like this. They themselves have been pains in the --- for years and years. The "teacher" is using PURE because there probably isn't a decent attorney who'd touch this with a ten foot pole. If this lady was a competent teacher, she'd have long since found a new school and a new life, which is what she needs to do. Anyone who goes to PURE for anything has got to have rocks in their head to begin with.
This woman needs to get a life and move on.
Fri Dec 21, 2007 at 1:41 AMBy: Kugler -- Trolling Trolling Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing Judge Not Lest Ye Be Judged!
Fri Dec 21, 2007 at 6:38 AMBy: What PURE really stands for Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing PURE is the hope of the hopeless!! What they REALLY are is PUCE (Parents United for Chaos in Education). They're the LAST one's I'd ever turn to if I had a really serious case. I know someone strongly affiliated with them and
they thrive on garbage like this. Any competent attorney would tell this woman that she has no case. If this pathetic woman's reputation has any respectability left, PURE (or more appropriately, PUCE) will completely kill it in spades with aces to spare.
Fri Dec 21, 2007 at 6:36 PMBy: Jillian Zachas Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing The principal of the school is a very fine young woman with small children of her own. She would never fire a teacher for being pregnant.
I'm guessing that the teacher in question is trying to get money out of the Board since her termination happened at the time of her pregnancy. She's probably staying home raising her baby, hoping to get a windfall. Throw PURE's people into it and you've got a perfect formula ---- for disaster. Why would any level-headed person to to PURE in the first place?????
Sat Dec 22, 2007 at 7:57 AMBy: a victim of pure Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing When I taught on the southwest side in the early 1990's, I went to PURE to help me solve a problem I was having with my school. They not only failed to solve the problem, but the publicity that came with it was so ugly that I've been branded ever since. It took me two years to find a principal that would hire me -even in the suburbs, where I am still teaching and very happy. PURE killed my career in Chicago.
Sat Dec 22, 2007 at 9:16 AMBy: Trollism Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing Bringing forth ideas that are anti-normal thinking.

hs
Sat Dec 22, 2007 at 6:11 PMBy: Pure Believer Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing The principal at my school has said "if I knew you were still going to have children, I never would have hired you in the first place" yes, there is a problem and I am glad it is being addressed
Sat Dec 22, 2007 at 7:59 PMBy: PURE BS? Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing Pure Believer,
Because your principal said that does not mean that the principal at Sauganash fired someone for being pregnant. Since the principal at Sauganash had children during her time as principal, that would be pretty hypocritical, don't you think? I don't believe it happened that way.
Sat Dec 22, 2007 at 8:32 PMBy: This is a silly thread Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing What any of you people think about PURE or the principal or the woman involved in the lawsuit is irrelevant and mindless conjecture. Your assumptions about what did or did not happen are warrantless and amount to nothing more than ill informed pseudo-opinions or outright fabrications.
Sun Dec 23, 2007 at 4:17 AMBy: fed up with the B.S. Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing I teach at the school and I can tell you no teacher at Sauganash has EVER been terminated because of a pregnancy. We've had several teachers take maternity leaves and have always returned to work. The principal, being a young mother herself, would NEVER, NEVER do anything like this. There are other reasons and this teacher should be ashamed of herself. The truth will out. It always does. Besides, what person in their right mind would want to remain where they weren't wanted? Where's her pride? But I guess that when one is after money, even ill-gotten, they have no conscience.l
Sun Dec 23, 2007 at 4:56 AMBy: George N. Schmidt Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing The nice thing about litigation is that everything is a matter of public record, not teacher lunchroom gossip. Why doesn't someone post the complaint (and the response, if one has been filed) instead of just churning around here? So far, the factual assertions here come from the press release.

By the way, if Sauganash Elementary wants to discuss things here, why doesn't someone document the overcrowding that was brought up (again) at the Wednesday (December 19) Chicago Board of Education and the runaround (again) that Sauganash is getting from Arne Duncan and Rufus Williams. The same week where Sauganash was told "There is no money. Go to Springfield" CPS announced that it's (a) putting an addition on the Peck school and (b) building a new elementary school at the corner of Grand Ave. and Central Ave.

While there are other major construction jobs going on around the city courtesy of CPS, the other two we're tracking are (a) Austin High School's exterior rehab work (which is now being done after Austin being given the same runaround for 25 years), and (b) the huge revamping of the Grant school "campus" (from Western Ave. to Campbell at Adams St. to fit it for the two military high schools presently in the building.

The Austin and Grant school rehabs (which conservatively will have cost $30 million when they are done) are typically following the destruction of the public schools that once were in those buildings, and their replacement by privatization and militarization schemes.
Sun Dec 23, 2007 at 7:28 AMBy: the truth is...... Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing Mr. Schmidt is, in this instance, correct. Sauganash has needed a building addition for years, and the need has become acute. My children attend the school, and it's one of the twenty best schools in the city, which is a credit to the principal, who has worked very hard. This charge by the teacher being fired for being pregnant is nonsense and is a waste of time. As Mr. Schmidt says, Sauganash has been given a run-around over a building addition for years. That Sauganash has accomplished it's wonderful academic standing is a credit to it's principal and a very hard working staff. My children look upon it as a second home, and parents work very hard as well. As far as this "suit" is concerned, I know for a fact that the charge is unfounded and untrue. More importantly, we need a building addition desperately. Are you listening, Mr. Duncan?
Or are you of the feeling that the principal and teachers can "manage the best they can"? If this is how you feel, then shame on you!
Sun Dec 23, 2007 at 9:16 AMBy: a bunch of baloney Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing We're living in the "gotcha" generation and everybody sues everybody for anything. My kids are in this school and it's a great place. The principal has high expectations for the students as well as the teachers. I seem to recall that she herself had a maternity leave a few years ago. Something very fishy here --- the teacher who is suing was a new teacher and wasn't there very long. Also, a teacher at Sauganash just returned from a maternity leave last spring. Sounds to me like a scam. This woman smells money and is using some goofy organization to help her. And yes, this school really needs a building addition. Great school, great administration and staff --- but very cramped.
Wed Dec 26, 2007 at 12:00 PMBy: PUCE Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing The person who mentioned pure as PUCE--you go it! NOTHING BUT TAKING CARE OF THEMSELVES AND CAUSING CHAOS--THEY ARE REALLY GOOD AT IT. pure got a Gates' grant--little does he know. Someone ought to tell him.
Thu Dec 27, 2007 at 7:42 AMBy: this teacher should be horse-whipped! Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing A rational person would have had her baby, then simply have found another teaching position in a different school and moved on. But even knowing full well that others in this school have taken maternity leaves and then were able to return, she seeks help from PURE, which as far as I'm concerned, blows her credibility right out of the water. She's a trouble-maker, and where else to go but to PURE, who themselves are the biggest trouble makers alongside of UNO. I know how these organizations work and how self-serving they are. We can thank the School Reform Act in 1989 for these paragons of "do-gooders". Whether she knows it or not, this teacher has branded herself by associating with such garbage. If she were smart, which she's not, she'd sever her association with PURE, and get her own attorney, assuming she finds one that would take on this stupid case.
Fri Dec 28, 2007 at 7:00 PMBy: When you have problems Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing do not cry when you need help form some administrator.
Fri Dec 28, 2007 at 7:43 PMBy: the curse of using PURE (and I don't mean soap!) Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing I agree with the previous post. This woman Kathleen Williams is obviously a very stupid lady. By crying to a rabble-rouser group like PURE, she is burning her bridges in the CPS. Principals have friends all throughout the system, and Miss Williams' reputation will surely proceed her WHEREVER she goes within the CPS. Some rational person should shake her up before it's too late and tell her to drop this stupid and unfounded suit before she makes herself completely unemployable ANYWHERE in the CPS. She's cutting her own throat, and PURE is allowing her to do it. I know a lot of principals and none of them will touch anyone who's ever been affiliated with PURE.
Fri Dec 28, 2007 at 8:33 PMBy: NO more Uno Schools, Please!! Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing I agree, UNO is a huge pile of crap!!!
Sun Dec 30, 2007 at 9:59 PMBy: Also hate PURE and UNO Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing Any principal or teacher who associates with either PURE or UNO are nothing more than trouble-makers and idiots. These two "organizations" have been responsible for so much misery in the CPS since 1989 that lawsuits should be filed against THEM. Their attorneys are only out for themselves, and they will use people and then throw them away like garbage. This teacher, by seeking recompense through THEM, is selling her soul to the devil. She can't be very smart. Make no mistake - she will learn a lesson for this association, but she won't get a chance to make it good because she'll be persona non grata in the entire CPS ---------and deservedly so.
Mon Dec 31, 2007 at 7:03 AMBy: Rod Estvan Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing This type of lawsuite in a school system as large as Chicago's is not uncommon. If one reads the legal settlements that CPS enters into with teachers who have been disciplined or removed in the Board reports each month one gets a better understanding of how often this happens.

One problem that principals are faced with is that they are in reality the front line of the school system in applying labor law to teachers and other staff. The administrative law class that is required for the IL admin certificate covers so many areas that it is in many ways useless. As in any organization the Board has a tendency to back up the administrative decisons of principals and look at the factual details only after a lawsuite has been filed.

As this blog has documented principals also have great difficulty correctly applying special education law and the school code as it relates to Local School councils. My own experience is that principals are selected for their educational leadership skills and not for their knowledge of the mulitple laws that effect public schools. A wise principal will be able to avoid legal pitfalls, but an agressive principal attempting to establish his or her authority will often make major legal errors.

So to be honest I do not understand why some of the posters were so upset by the lawsuite or the fact that PURE was involved in it. Even if the lawsuite is found not to have merit by the Court, clearly it does put school level administrators on notice that they must operate within the context of our legal structure.

As for those teachers who have commented on the fact that the teacher bringing this action against the CPS will in the end suffer because she will not be hired again, I have to say there is great truth in those comments. As George knows only too well there is indeed such a thing as a blacklist. This list of trouble making teachers is not limited to CPS, it can extend into the suburbs. I have seen special education teachers who have had major administrative conflicts have trouble being hired outside of Chicago even through there is a major special ed teachers shortage.

Rod Estvan
Mon Dec 31, 2007 at 7:05 AMBy: Rod Estvan Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing This type of lawsuite in a school system as large as Chicago's is not uncommon. If one reads the legal settlements that CPS enters into with teachers who have been disciplined or removed in the Board reports each month one gets a better understanding of how often this happens.

One problem that principals are faced with is that they are in reality the front line of the school system in applying labor law to teachers and other staff. The administrative law class that is required for the IL admin certificate covers so many areas that it is in many ways useless. As in any organization the Board has a tendency to back up the administrative decisons of principals and look at the factual details only after a lawsuite has been filed.

As this blog has documented principals also have great difficulty correctly applying special education law and the school code as it relates to Local School councils. My own experience is that principals are selected for their educational leadership skills and not for their knowledge of the mulitple laws that effect public schools. A wise principal will be able to avoid legal pitfalls, but an agressive principal attempting to establish his or her authority will often make major legal errors.

So to be honest I do not understand why some of the posters were so upset by the lawsuite or the fact that PURE was involved in it. Even if the lawsuite is found not to have merit by the Court, clearly it does put school level administrators on notice that they must operate within the context of our legal structure.

As for those teachers who have commented on the fact that the teacher bringing this action against the CPS will in the end suffer because she will not be hired again, I have to say there is great truth in those comments. As George knows only too well there is indeed such a thing as a blacklist. This list of trouble making teachers is not limited to CPS, it can extend into the suburbs. I have seen special education teachers who have had major administrative conflicts have trouble being hired outside of Chicago even through there is a major special ed teachers shortage.

Rod Estvan
Mon Dec 31, 2007 at 9:18 AMBy: George N. Schmidt Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing "...As for those teachers who have commented on the fact that the teacher bringing this action against the CPS will in the end suffer because she will not be hired again, I have to say there is great truth in those comments. As George knows only too well there is indeed such a thing as a blacklist. This list of trouble making teachers is not limited to CPS, it can extend into the suburbs. I have seen special education teachers who have had major administrative conflicts have trouble being hired outside of Chicago even through there is a major special ed teachers shortage..." Rod earlier this morning.

Just to update that.

Despite the fact that I am a whistle blower, CPS has kept my on their DO NOT HIRE list for nine years now (February 1, 2008 will be precisely the 9th anniversary of when I was ordered to Camp Beverly from Bowen High School in Chicago, where I had been teaching English).

Despite the fact that CPS voted to stop using the CASE tests less than two years after I blew the whistle on the CASE tests as a piece of nonsense and a waste of money, the DO NOT HIRE LIST wasn't removed, even after my lawyer and I met with Patrick Rocks and an assistant on that very topic. As a result of that and other experiences (not the least of which is the waste of money for lawyers on Corey H) my conclusion has been that the Law Department at CPS should be considered the ANTILAW Department, since their main jobs (under Rocks, as under his predecessors Ruth Moscovitch and Marilyn Johnson) in the Daley Years is to make sure that both the letter and spirit of the law is violated when the power of the mayor and his minions are questions. Rocks doesn't even try to hide his smirk at Board meetings when people with reasonable complaints talk about suing the Board, because he knows the Board's strategy is to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars in public money to cynically stall any litigation -- no matter how meritorious, as in Corey H -- on behalf of his masters at Clark St. and City Hall.

Chicago's DO NOT HIRE list is honored in the suburbs. Once again this year, I've been looking for suburban teaching jobs, and even made a move to try and find them as a substitute teacher. In a couple of cases, things looked promising. Suddenly, the wall of silence descends over all conversation, and you get that sad look from people who know they are doing something craven, but have been ordered to do it and have no choice.

Yes, as the New Year dawns, Chicago's ignoble reality leers across the USA. I'm told that Paul Vallas recently hired Linda P and Johnetta J as expensive bureaucrats for his New Orleans operation, while hundreds of teachers there are still out of work, having seen Hurricane Katrina and the implementation of the "Shock Doctrine" ruin their lives and professional careers, thanks to the Bush and Daley people.

For reasons that will become clear this year, however, I'm more optimistic than recently. Daley is being called the buffoon that he's always been (most recently in yesterday's Sun-Times) and even the corporate Chicago media can sustain the coverups of the crimes of the Daley administration (remember "school reform" was only part of the three-part attack on poor, mostly black children, with "housing reform" and "welfare reform" causing damage as great as "Renaissance 2010" to thousands).

So Happy 2008, y'all.

Despite all the (typical, by the way, anonymous) ranting here against a teacher who exercised her legal rights (after having been denied them at Sauganash), the litigation moves forward. Other teachers have begun winning age discrimination cases against those schooled in Chicago's ugly schools of "data driven" principalship -- and those "above" them in chain of command. There has even been some poetic justice, as people who spent a lifetime kissing up to POWER (mostly, Daley and his minions) didn't live long enough to collect the pensions they claimed they had to lie cheat and steal to get to.

And now, in the spirit of "First they came for...", the majority of principals are facing Comstat at the hands of a guy named Bryan Samuels, who is less qualified to be a tyrant here at Chicago's schools than, bless us, Arne Duncan or Josh Edelman. There is kind of poetic justice in principals who bullied teachers facing crazed data bullying at the hands of incompetents whose pay runs into six figures, but such is life.
Mon Dec 31, 2007 at 7:12 PMBy: glad to be retiring in June Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing Glad to be retiring in June, 2008 after 36 years. What is Camp Beverly? I've heard it eluded to a few times, but still don't know what or where it is. Is this the place where they put teachers who have been banished from schools and still have to pay them? I've led a very sheltered CPS life. Worked under nine different principals, and liked them all. Never got involved with political garbage or with the likes of PURE or UNO, or things like that. I simply did my job. Have always been a union member, but fortunately never needed them for anything of a personal nature. I 've obviously missed out on a lot. I've had a great career and am happy to move on.
Tue Jan 1, 2008 at 11:04 AMBy: George N. Schmidt Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing "Is this the place where they put teachers who have been banished from schools and still have to pay them?..."

Yes. It was located on the upper floors of 125 S. Clark St. for a time. Now it's been dispersed, gulag like, into the area offices.
Thu Jan 3, 2008 at 11:02 PMBy: Myrna Berquist Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing Is Mr. Schmidt saying that trouble-making teachers who raise hell in their schools are allowed to sit and do nothing at a "Bamp Beverly" and are allowed to get paid for doing nothing? No wonder so many trouble-makers go out of their way to get there. They should be ashamed of themselves.
And I'm sure this "fired" and pregnant teacher is no exception. Great society we live in! The Board should be tarred and feathered for allowing this. Does the Union sanction this? Shameful!
Fri Apr 4, 2008 at 10:09 PMBy: Buffalo Chip Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing go for it sully!
Fri Apr 4, 2008 at 10:10 PMBy: Buffalo Chip Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing go for it sully!
Fri Apr 4, 2008 at 10:13 PMBy: Click once Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing When sending, calm down and click one time.
Wed May 21, 2008 at 10:21 AMBy: Click once Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing When sending, calm down and click one time.
Wed May 21, 2008 at 10:21 AMBy: Click once Lawsuit Filed Against CPS For Pregnancy Firing When sending, calm down and click one time.

top
Add Your Comment

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. District 299 reserves the right to delete or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Reader comments are limited to 500 words.





Comment:
Just so we know you're a human and not a spammer, please answer the following question: + =