District299: The Chicago Schools Blog
Return To Main Blog Page
Friday, September 25, 2009
Free At Last.
At last, popular Chicago schools can let more white kids in. 

No more pesky 35 percent rule (WBEZ).






Update:  Comments are now closed.  The site is moving.  Previous comments have been moved here.  Click there to read previous posts and continue the conversation.  Thanks!



Comments
Fri Sep 25, 2009 at 6:26 AMBy: Concerned Free At Last. What school?
Fri Sep 25, 2009 at 6:27 AMBy: Concerned 2 Free At Last. We know that all reform is about what is best for the children.
Fri Sep 25, 2009 at 8:53 AMBy: Extremely concerned Free At Last. are you kidding me? I hope you were being sarcastic, Alexander.
Fri Sep 25, 2009 at 10:43 AMBy: ASW Free At Last. Do you have s link to the judges opinion?
Fri Sep 25, 2009 at 11:59 AMBy: cermak_rd Free At Last. http://www.chicagopublicradio.org/files/2009_09_24%20Ruling%20Terminating%20Consent%20Decree.pdf
Fri Sep 25, 2009 at 12:09 PMBy: ASW Free At Last. Thanks, Cermack
Fri Sep 25, 2009 at 12:47 PMBy: Rod Estvan Free At Last. I do not want to sound sanctimonious, but using the heading of “Free At Last” by Alexander in reference to Judge Kocoras terminating and vacating the Second Amended Consent Decree in USA vs. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO (80 C 5124) desegregation case walked the line of being disrespectful of the heritage of the civil rights movement in Chicago. I suspect Alexander was being fatuous. I read the decision in its totality and was not surprised by anything in it.

If you read the book “Dismantling Desegregation: The Quiet Reversal of Brown v. Board of Education” (1996) you can read passages from numerous similar decisions made in cases involving Prince George and Montgomery counties outside Washington, DC, Charlotte, Kansas City, Norfolk, Austin, Detroit, and Little Rock. The results have been clear, minority students have experienced greater segregation, all be it legal, once the various desegregation cases were vacated by courts. The same I expect will happen here in Chicago regardless of CPS attempts to limit the impact of the ending of the case by using some form of social economic preference in the magnet and selective schools.

Given the economic arguments for ending the consent decree made by CPS and cited by Judge Kocoras in his decision it seems logical that CPS will move with dispatch to end busing entitlements to elementary magnet schools and additional resources provided to racially isolated schools. The former CPS Board President Williams discussed this in a TV interview over a year ago indicating he expected this form of busing to be phased out once the decree was lifted.

What we may see over time is an increase in the overall white student population in CPS, with numerous preferred elementary schools on the north and in the near Loop areas becoming 60 to 90 percent white and middle class over a number of years. Possibly as this reality unfolds the Hispanic and Black community will realize what is happening. However, the social economic divide within those communities themselves may prevent much mobilization against re-segregation, because political elites and the middle class within those communities will likely not face segregation. This is because the children of those elites and minority children from middle class college educated families will score well enough to be competitive without any racial set asides in place.

Given the fact that more wealthy families pay more in property taxes in Chicago than do poorer families any CPS scheme to contain access to the very best CPS schools will likely face litigation supported by conservative advocacy groups that outright oppose all forms of what they consider to be social engineering. Equal justice unfortunately for the poor applies to the more wealthy of Chicago too.

The most optimistic perspective I can have in relation to the vacating of the Second Amended Consent Decree is that over time the poor in the minority communities in Chicago will force their own political elites to be accountable to their electorate, which is overwhelmingly living on the economic margins in Chicago. Part of that accountability will require that Chicago have a democratically elected school board, whose agenda supports the interests of Chicago’s poor minority communities.


Rod Estvan
Fri Sep 25, 2009 at 1:15 PMBy: majority minority? Free At Last. How will the end of the decree impact schools that have the marjority-minority program in place?
Fri Sep 25, 2009 at 1:19 PMBy: CPS pov Free At Last. I think Alex's headline reflects the CPS admin point of view. They've wanted this. And fought for it.
Fri Sep 25, 2009 at 1:37 PMBy: huberman speaks Free At Last. pretending they're not totally happy:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

September 25, 2009





STATEMENT BY CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS CEO RON HUBERMAN ON THE TERMINATION OF THE SECOND AMENDED CONSENT DECREE



For more than 20 years, Chicago Public Schools have remained committed to implementing major reforms to ensure integration throughout the District. On September 24, 1980, the Unites States of America filed a lawsuit against the Board of Education alleging that the Board operated a dual system that segregated students. CEO Ron Huberman announced today that Charles P. Kocoras, United States District Judge, has terminated and vacated the Second Amended Consent Decree.



“The court has held that Chicago Public Schools are in compliance with the Constitution and the laws of the United States in the District’s efforts to achieve unitary status. We recognize the importance of promoting diverse learning communities for every student and remain committed to the development of a fair admissions process to achieve that goal even further,” Huberman said.



Huberman has appointed a transition team to establish a new admissions process to ensure equal and fair access to Chicago public schools across all Chicago communities. Huberman added that any new policy would incorporate the controls being built into the selective enrollment process.



“We will continue to review the existing magnet selective enrollment policies and guidelines, and we will be implementing those controls as we move forward in the transition process.”







###
Fri Sep 25, 2009 at 1:40 PMBy: ASW Free At Last. Rod: I agree with you about the poor title of this post.

I would like to relate a recent experience I had in a class at a Chicago university. The class was a Middle School endorsment class made up of mostly CPS' High School and Elementary School teachers. Most of the teachers were young, black and hispanic educators. The subject of Brown came up and I was shocked at the level of indifference or hostility toward desegregation and Brown. The feeling expressed was that desegregation and magnet schools took resources from minority and nighborhood schools. It appears, from this class, that younger people don't feel the same reverence older people, like me, might have toward Brown.

That said, I am curious where you think these "white" (of course, hispanic may mean any race but I see you, like the court, make a distinction) kids will come from? What will change the demographic decline of "whites" in CPS from 18% in 1980 to 8% today? I think your wrong about this. In a short number of years, hispanics are likely to become the majority population in CPS, and the black-white issues of the past 50 years will likely have little meaning to them.
Fri Sep 25, 2009 at 2:01 PMBy: Rod to ASW Free At Last. I think the percentage of white students will increase for two reasons. First white middle class families on the north side and near loop are becoming more comfortable with CPS schools because they can see at least some of these schools can produce academic results. Second the overall number of low income minority students will continue to decline in CPS due to the cost of housing in Chicago and the strategic destruction of public housing.

I think a really great example of this is Blaine School, which in 2008 was 44% white and was only 38.3% just two years before. This school will be 60% white within a few years because at the Kg level the school is 52.7% white at the pre-K level 52.7% white.

Rod Estvan
Fri Sep 25, 2009 at 2:17 PMBy: Rod correction Free At Last. at preK 55.7%
Fri Sep 25, 2009 at 2:24 PMBy: keri Free At Last. So is that why cps and all its departments only hire young white females.,
Fri Sep 25, 2009 at 5:09 PMBy: bob Free At Last. Free of what?



From 1970 until 1995 I never taught a white kid. Only saw one in all
those years. Not only that but we were housed in a toxic dump of a building
that several assigned teachers never even entered once it was so rabid.
Now I must ask myself if it all meant anything. We would have been proud to have
ANY White or Hispanic or Oriental kids in that rotten building, so would our
students. Now even the pretense of integration is a mute point.
I bet the law department of the board is happy. Since 1954 that lot has
been able to stop any real integration by the CPS. So I would like to know
who is free of what? Dr.King must be rolling over in his grave.
Fri Sep 25, 2009 at 8:48 PMBy: you are a teacher? Free At Last. Hey 'bob' - you are a teacher?? Dear Lord! Its not MUTE you f*cking moron its MOOT.

You should be working the drive thru, not teaching!
Fri Sep 25, 2009 at 9:03 PMBy: you are a teacher? Free At Last. "oriental" is not culturally sensitive either.
Fri Sep 25, 2009 at 11:20 PMBy: ... Free At Last. this site has moved.
new comments on this thread go here:

http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/district-299/2009/09/free-at-last-to-let-in-more-white-kids.html

here

About

The opinions expressed in District 299: The Chicago Schools Blog are strictly those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Catalyst Chicago or the Community Renewal Society, its publisher.

Powered by Technorati