First Lady Recruited For New Leaders Job
"Back in 2000, Jon Schnur was looking for someone to head up the Chicago branch of his fledgling nonprofit for training inner-city principals, New Leaders for New Schools. "People told me the most talented person I could find was someone named Michelle Obama," Schnur recalled. "I was able to reach Barack Obama, who put me in touch with her," but the future first lady couldn't be persuaded."Wow. Imagine if that'd happened. Even more pub for New Leaders than it already has. Sort of explains how Schnur got into the Obama campaign so early and so deep.
Their educational plan is educationese claptrap. They are like any other lobbying group. Follow the money. They want a school district's human resources' money so they can train principals, who will in turn "counsel out low-performing teachers" (read that as tenured teachers making big salaries) and then hire ingenues who will never rock the authoritarian boat.
All new principal training organizations, teacher training organizations and charter school creators have one common theme:
Show Me The Money!
By the way, where is he going to get a job?
You guys sure are some haters! All of you need to retire and go sit your behinds down somewhere and let the New Leaders bring it on in Chicago! New Leaders know what to do, how to do it, and they are not afraid to take risks! True leaders have to be willing to do whatever you have to do to get it done, and they do that. They don't always follow the book, but it gets done. You old timers are the ones that have following the books, rules and procedures for years, and the kids just got more and more ignorant. You baby-boomers are not willing to take a risk and stand up for whatever and whoever you believe in to make education happen for these children nowadays. You all need to join New Leaders and bring a change to public education in Chicago.
Alexander wrote an article in 2004 called "The Waiting Game." Here is just one of his comments. Read the whole article.
"The New Leaders training, while intense, will not make them curriculum experts. They get enough training and experience to talk the talk and are expected to learn along the way. And so, despite the widely acknowledged need for better-trained principals, reports of shortages, and waves of retirees, New Leaders candidates can end up seeming green. 'Everybody just wants experience,' says one Chicago school administrator who has observed several of the principal searches where New Leaders fellows were interviewed. 'The bottom line is that schools want someone to run the school, not just theories.'"
The principal of Ravenswood had 4 years 2004-2008 to demonstrate the miracle education plan that he purchased through his training program at NLNS. His LSC booted him out. Whoops. Guess they all practice haterism, too. Maybe they should retire from the ranks of people who can think for themselves.
Simply, when a principal works fours years and fails like some of the stories we hear, imagine all the children that were deprived of a good education by this malfeasance.
What should then happen is an investigation as to why the board of education allowed incompetent mangers to run a school without stopping it. Two issues here:
1. Contractual obligations of performance by principal
2. Damage to children(lack of proper education)
If the board was notified of the incompetence then I say it is even intentional misconduct by the biard and that may start falling under criminal law depending on the harm done to the children of a particular school. (sp ed issues, violence, non-certified staff, improper programming, etc......)
there is absolutely no transparency or accountability with programs like New Leaders for New Schools.
John Kugler
kuglerjohn@comast.net
Getting back to NLNS, they do select some bright young individuals, and they do a great job of finding them jobs. One trick is to convince any New Leader that if you do secure a principalship, your only loyal candidate for assistant principal must come from New Leaders. They know data, but with possibly only 2 years of experience in the classroom, please tell me how they can know instruction and be competent instructional leaders. If you are in a school run by a New Leader, you probably know that the principal is in many meetings (how corporate), not very visible, and may not be very adept at human relations or navigating the political landscape. One may also question the loyalty of a New Leaders principal. My observations indicate that loyalty to New Leaders takes precedence over loyalty to CPS or the school. Just some observations.
To This is hateism.
You wrote this:
“ You guys sure are some haters! All of you need to retire and go sit your behinds down somewhere and let the New Leaders bring it on in Chicago!”
Nice try, but, the street lingo is a bit dated and too hip to be believed. I wonder how many of
The new wiz kids in this program will still be around in 5 years?
Everyone is still looking for the silver bullet, or the Salk vaccine, to fix some of our schools.
Many new teachers are sure that the only think the damaged kids of Chicago need
For their redemption is a dose of them. I would not call it arrogance, but a deep
misunderstanding of the stupendous baggage so many of our kids carry into school
every day.
I don’t hate anyone. But, All these new Leaders better wake up and realize that being a boss does not make you a leader.
Oh and for fact, I know one NL member who had someone else write the essay—NL never checked. Now that’s really fun.
Why do you think CPS had to kick out the last list and make the requirement tighter? Although, anyone can be an interim now--EVEN if you do not live in the city after 11/1996 and cannot get on the list. It is a shame and a sham.
There's a nice file of evidence from teachers and parents being built up that New Leaders can't lead unless they can terrorize. They have no people skills.
There will be more added to the list by the fall. AND ANY AIO or MSD or BIG administrator who does not keep their job now, will be an interim principal --so even LESS need for new leaders. it is a waste of money. I mean look, they put Don Anderson in a school--CLASS could NOT afford him-- wasn't he to be the new wonderboy of HR?--he is not even on the list and does he live in Chicago? Come on donors--look for someplace else to donate--like elder care or orphanages--or someone honest for US Senate from IL....
What is also unfortunate is how you “contributors” throw names out as if you are the master of the game of omni-educator. PLEASE WITH THE SLANDER.
- Nolo Press
Now, if the statement if factual...
I was blessed to become a principal on my own, no special program, no relation to the alderman or to the former CPAA president. On my own—proud of that. Loved it, served a number years and did not want to leave, but CPS has its ways of grinding you down. There is no doubt that my past experience as an assistant principal and knowledge of the system got my school further than ANY launch or new leaders program. Being a principal is a hard work, harder than a number of other professions. We constantly must stay current and fight all battles as CPS (tries to) takes from our students. Going through a summer program and an internship here and there is not concrete well-worn experience. And as someone said earlier, CPS has enough principals now. We have knowledgeable assistant principals who are ready and able to take the helm—I have personally trained 2 of them as they are now successful principals today. I have trained 2 others who are fantastic student-centered APs.
Experience is sold short in these programs and that is most unfortunate. So I am not surprised when these new leaders create and find themselves with deep problems in deep holes.
GEORGE, do you have a list ???
Your larger point is well taken - don't assume a few bad apples spoil the entire basket.
But the problem with facts like these, and other facts based on standardized high stakes tests, is that they don't account for what is happening outside of that testing room...for instance, the purging of students at Dodge since the "turnaround", a major factor in test score increases.
KIPP Ascend, despite its charter status, is another more easily documented example. Test scores go up and up and up for each grade level. AMAZING! But ignored is the fact that the number of students in each successive grade level goes down and down and down - nearly 30% of students end up elsewhere by the time their KIPP peers graduate. Not surprisingly, it is not the best and the brightest from KIPP that move back to their neighborhood schools or move on to other schools.
Magnets and neighborhood schools, especially those that are massively overcrowded, are not immune to this purging, either. Many schools boot the riff-raff before testing time so they don't bring the scores down.
UNTRUE--I was there--Arne asked at an AMPS meeting for principals to come forward if they were interested in a turnaround school--and she went to him. She was having problems at Kellogg and burned parents--she was smart to take this opportunity. Worth it to watch the scores there. As for Ames, ASK the LSC about it. She HAD to go to Elgin--she was run out of town. The problem is that when they fail, they really fail and they do not know how to correct this learned behavior from their nl program. They are usurpers and egoists--bad for schools, bad for students.
Right on on all you say above. But guess what--the charters are taking away selective enrollemnt students--what will we do whne the selective enromment and lottery schools' socre go down--oh what will we do?
That is a good parody (maybe too true to be parody?)!
Of course the usual answer is that teachers are lazy and old. Sure that's it. Tyrannical principals are just unlucky enough to be hired by an LSC that doesn't disclose what the new principal is in for.
Only people who are not involved with the tyrants feel the need to voice an opinion about how mischaracterized the principals are. Wonder why they don't apply for a job at these schools? After all, tyrannical principals are getting rid of veteran teachers as fast as they can.


Digg
Del.icio.us
Mail

