Connected Kids At Elite High Schools
Half of the 616 Illinois students who received preferential treatment from 2005 to 2009 graduated from just 22 high schools, all but one in the metro area. Highland Park High had the most kids on the list, with Loyola Academy coming in second. There were only 25 kids on the clout list from CPS schools.
What do you think of the clout list scandal, and the implications for kids who attend elite high schools but may not have connected parents?
Oh and a blast from the past: Marybeth Vander Weele is one of the UIUC trustees. What a hoot. How did THAT happen?
5 students placed on clout lists from 2005 to 2009.
All of them were accepted to the U. of I.
From this high school during 2005 to 2009...
Applicants 625 Admitted 399 Attending 188
See a year by year breakdown
Year Clout List Total
Applicants Admitted Applicants Admitted Attending
2005 0 0 112 69 42
2006 1 1 121 71 38
2007 2 2 131 95 47
2008 1 1 118 83 35
2009 1 1 143 81 26
I understand quite a few black students get in through the agriculture department. Black students needed and all that.
-- alexander
You're right - that's the real question, Alexander. Why would kids in selective enrollment high schools need clout to get into U of I. We're not talking Harvard or Stanford here. What do you need, a 28 or 29 ACT to get in without clout? Maybe the new rules allowing the selective enrollment schools to admit not-so-smart athletes will increase the number of CPS kids who need to get in with clout.
I don't think it reflects on the schools at all, except to the extent that the clout class considers some schools worthy of its kids and others not -- and you can't blame the schools either way.
Does anyone think the selective enrollment high schools and the trendy elementary magnets are affected by this stuff? I guess I'd assume so since it looks like every other Chicago institution is infected with clout-itis, a contagious disease. Where, what is the vaccine?
The first is that there is a meritocracy that should govern all access to the major four-year universities.
The second is that the meritocracy can best be measured by standardized test scores, in this case, the ACT.
American university education has always been first and foremost a privilege of the wealthy. Those few exceptions, for the briefest time in history (roughly, the end of World War II into the Reagan Revolution days) merely proved how constant the weight of wealth and privilege is, was, and probably will continue to be.
Having enjoyed the privilege of an academic scholarship to the University of Chicago in the mid-1960s, I can remember the slow dawning of the realization about those facts as I worked (two jobs; plus classes) to complete my BA.
Every American university has its "legacy" admissions. The most dramatic example since the beginning of the 21st Century was George W. Bush. Yale BA. Harvard MBA.
I don't recall the Chicago Tribune bemoaning the fact that one of our best-educated presidents (and our first "Business" president; remember that one?) was undercompetent and underqualified. Family wealth guaranteed those two slots to that drunken dolt. An family wealth assured him of "passing" in the classes he had to take.
But, then, there were other American presidents whose family wealth brought them into the best universities, and who paraded degrees from those universities. One whose name comes immediately to mind today is John F. Kennedy.
As one comment earlier noted: This is hardly a "Man bites dog story." Wealth buys political power. Political power buys admissions to public universities. Greater wealth and you can keep even the dimmest bulb on your family tree in the elite prep schools, and then make sure that they get their degrees, one way or the other, from Yale and Harvard.
Given all the things that the Chicago Tribune can spend its remaining investigative dollars on, this is interesting, but far from central to the problems of most Chicagoans. Some might even argue it's a diversion from the huge impact of huge wealth and even greater clout on every aspect of civic life today in Chicago. After all, more Chicago school children will be faced with disruption from Olympics 2016 than will ever face the issue of whether they did or didn't get into University of Illinois based on the quality of their high school work.
We are all shocked by the revelation that clout can
Get you into Illinois. Has anyone done a follow up yet and
Determined if clout can keep you there? Why was a list kept
after acceptance?
To me the real disgusting part of all this is the fact that
Deserving kids have been rejected, while the connected
Students have gotten a pass. I have personally known
gifted athletes who find a way to get in to the university.
The NCAA finds ways to police the worst cases of this abuse
But who polices academia?
I hope this is only the tip of the iceberg and some of the
Other practices of our state are investigated, for example, the
grading of Illinois Bar Exam. I guess everything is for sale
in Illinois.
Dear OT
I was just following a train of thought. It has been reveled that
Clout was used to get students into Law School. So did that
Clout follow them to that professions logical conclusion?
In a state where Drivers Licenses, Hospital construction permits
And Senate seats have been put up for sale Who Knows?
Chief Illiniwek's halftime dances may have been derogatory and racist, but clout lists are the undertone of something much more sinister.
http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/garrard-mcclendon-live/2009/07/better-high-school-more-clout.html


Digg
Del.icio.us
Mail

