Fired From Central Office Dear Alexander and Steve:
I chose both of you as recipients of this missive because you are proprietors of two compelling Chicagocentric blogs that I'm linking to here for the benefit of cc and bcc recipients who may not know of you, District 299 blog (http://www.catalyst-chicago.
You need to know the classless, low-rent way in which layoffs are being handled at Central Office, in general, and specifically at Information & Technology Services (ITS) where I worked until being given my walking papers yesterday.
At the outset, I must make mention of some particulars:
- My name may be used with redaction of my e-mail account information;
- Please disregard/redact anybody else's e-mail account information;
- Anybody being criticized here is in the cc box;
- Interested other parties are in the bcc box;
- I am not bitter about being let go; I'm definitely taking the summer off to write, and just be; and
- Fortuitously, I hit a major slot machine jackpot this past weekend in Indiana this past weekend.
Yesterday, I got a call from the person who handles hiring/firing at ITS who directed me to a meeting in a conference room with Arshele Stevens, who is chief information officer at CPS and heads our team. I have copied her e-mail of June 10 to prove my point that she lied in that communication (I have redacted her direct line and related information). I was surprised and had to laugh when I found myself sitting across from me at a conference table reading from a pro forma script that she had to request from an HR person who was also in attendance. She barely made eye contact as she read from said script; you've failed as an organizational leader if you can't/don't/won't take interpersonal communication seriously. This was also the same individual who danced with me at a Christmas party in December. I had high hopes for her when she was named CIO but I'm afraid that she's in over her head.
I was laid off along with Stephanie Book yesterday. In the proverbial single fell swoop, they let go the most experienced, skilled and versatile writer and the only phot[o]grapher and graphic designer on the ITS communication team (Stephanie Book is one skilled photographer!).
As I said, I'm set financially and my beef now is with how this clusterfuck is being handled. For instance, the woman who legitimately should head the ITS customer relations team has been shunted off to be a technology coordinator in the schools (good for whatever school gains from Stacy Butler-Cross and her skills & experience but bad for Central Office customer relations efforts). I know that this move resulted from the relationship between Arshele Stevens and Veletta Bell (the current customer relations honcho at ITS).
Further, my immediate supervisor knew this past weekend that I would be gone Monday. Thom Goodwin and I worked on the communications team at ITS. He could have called me over the weekend to let me know, even taken me into confidence if necessary to save his job (a move I would have understood and even hailed). But his inaction (furthered by how he was prepared to return a book unread that I had loaned him) tells me that he can no longer lay claim to being a "professional communicator." How he slept over the weekend is between him and a god if he has one.
Finally, I must address the idea of Ron Huberman as CEO of CPS (I would have included him in the cc box but, unfortunately, he has despotic tendencies such as not listing himself in the CPS e-mail client Outlook address book). I am entering my twenty-second year as a corporate communications professional. I have seen organizations communicate poorly in a crisis or do so in mediocre fashion; however, I have never, ever, known an organization that DID NOT COMMUNICATE AT ALL during full-blown tumult (Arshele Stevens lied when she said "However, as soon as there is any information, it will be shared with you..." in the e-mail below because there was NO communication whatsover; in fact, CO employees heard about layoffs on June 10 from media reports and the next thing people being let go knew was the "meeting" such as I had yesterday with Arshele). Either Huberman's internal communications shop is filled with worthless people (I know this to be untrue given that I've worked with the gifted Anitra Schulte) but, more likely, nobody in power there has the testicular fortitude (please pardon use of the Blago coinage) to call Huberman on this communications fiasco.
As an inveterate copyeditor, I must also state that Thom Goodwin (who was involved in the drafting of Arshele's e-mail below) and others on my team had to be told by me that "prideful" in the e-mail below was a singularly unfortunate word choice. They will miss that expertise that I brought to the table, regardless of whether they admit it.
This exercise has been delightfully cathartic. I will continue to follow both your blogs with considerable interest.
Best regards,
Hari Chengalath
From: Information & Technology Services
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009
6:55 PM
To: 12510 ESP - TechnologySvcs;
12510 TEACHER - TechnologySvcs
Subject: CPS Budget Update
ITS Team,
I know that many of you have concerns about the recent media coverage on the state of the CPS budget.
At this time, the details of how ITS will be affected by our budget are not available. However, as soon as there is any information, it will be shared with you.
Until that time, I ask that you continue to be diligent and prideful in your work.
Thank you,
Arshele Stevens
Information and Technology Services
Chicago Public Schools|www.cps.edu
125 S. Clark 3rd Floor|Chicago, IL 60603
It was a ghost town at the E Center yesterday--I heard over 40 positions closed there last Friday.
Call any of the ladies this former employee mentions above--I bet they are really young. Will CPS counter-- now that stats show they have lost many black teachers, but look at all the many young black professionals we have at central office?? And shame on them loosing Stacy Butler-Cross--whoever made that mistake should be fired!
funny thing buy the end of the month(June 30) i will have at least 2000 pcs of equipment in stock this time far away from CPS. with plans for fixing 5 North Carolina STEM schools, a Cameroon school, a Philippines school, and a new contact to build and equip a CTE school for women in Nepal and starting a 21st Century classroom in an Alternative school in Chicago.
HiHo
Most of the reorganization is going to be dribbled in so that there is no way to focus on the vast changes Huberman is making, both through the ruthless purges (such as documented here) and through the completely inappropriate executive-level appointments (just about nobody in his top echelon will he any classroom experience).
The June 24 Board agenda lists the following for "Resolutions" honoring the retirements of...
Ascencion Juarez (Executive Officer, Human Resources)
Cynthia Kay Barron (Retired Area Instruction Officer, Area 25)
Anailia Chico (Retired Area Instruction Officer, Area 12)
Olga La Luz (Retired Area Instruction Officer, Area 4)
Norma Rodriguez (Retired Area Instruction Officer, Area 23)
Plus a large number of principals.
All of the Board Reports are boilerplate. Under Arne Duncan and Paul Vallas, they actually contained a summary of each person's career, beginning with first teaching work. Now they are generalizations.
Nobody else even gets honorable mention, and since they are lining people up for these bureaucratic firing squads every day at this point, I wouldn't be surprised if Huberman were absent for some of the Board meeting. After all, he's one of those guys who likes to watch other people in pain.
Another example of Hubermanian efficiency.
Back in the day before such manic bottom lineiness, Tribune knew it had a responsibility to determine whether Foreman High School was "West Side" or "Northwest Side." Now it's look how far west a school is in some data base, and that's it. Every day new junk gets into the "news" stream, much of it fed via Power Point at the Editorial Board Briefings done by the rich and powerful. Advance Illinois is just a current example of the genre.
The same is true at CPS today. The High School Directory, to give one example, came out in January (too late to help people applying to the magnet schools, but convenient to the charters!) listing Aspira Mirta Ramirez (among its more droll mistakes) at 2435 N. Western, which is a rat infested abandoned warehousey building, while Mirta Ramirez has been over at Moos for two years! The old fuddy duddies (non visionary, non "entrepreneurial") who used to insist that 100 percent accuracy was a worthy objective were worth more than their weight in gold. Betty Shiras was the example at CPS for supervising data entry in payroll records, and her crew was exemplary for the entire country.
Now we've got Bob Runcie, Ron Huberman's crazy notions about worshipping nonsensical DATA, and the "Excuse of the Day" society.
One of my favorite exercises (that I'm indulging in this morning), is to get 4-5 newspapers and go to work on them with a red Sharpie.
http://cpsobsessed.com/
(current entry on new CAO job)
Good for you and you are needed. I am tired of reading news stories that do not make sense, since no one cares to write right correctly). Sometimes I wonder why CPS put so much weight on student writing, when it is all computers now.
The High School Directories came out in October, 2008, not January, 2009 as you've stated. The Elementary Directories came out later, so perhaps this is what you were speaking of.
I respect and appreciate you, George, but there are times when you don't have your facts straight, and I wish you would make a better effort to do so.
The elemtary did not come until January--AFTER the application process was due!
Now they just go in the garbage.
In other words, you agreed with what I said, but for some reason, you are defending George who wrote the wrong thing... Also, you could have made up a name instead of reusing mine...
Chicago student, teachers, administrators, parents, and community members have grown apathetic and no longer stand up for ensuring all students receive a world class education in safe neighborhood community schools.
It only takes one voice to create an awareness about the ways in which non-educators are creating barriers to teachers and administrators receiving the support and resouces they need to make sure students receive a high quality 21st century education to improve the quality of their lives. We all must do whatever it takes to put children first!
Numerous communications tools are available to express your concerns of non-educators running a major urban education system even though they were educated by educators to be in leadership roles today. Look at how global communications is spreading the word about what is going on in Dafur and Iran. The time is now to create an awareness campaign, demand transparency and involvement in the decision making process. This is exactly what PURE and other grasroots community organizations have been trying to do for years.
Our President needs to know privitazation is not the only answer for failing public schools it is the mindset of people in charge who are lead by their egos for power and control who have little or no understanding about what it takes to improve teaching and indivualized student learning. President Obama needs to come to Chicago Public Schools to conduct one of his "Town Hall Meetings" on creating 21st century world class community schools focused on college and workforce readiness.
It is time to let all the leadership of the Chicago Public Schools and City Hall who work for us know we will not settle for anything less than the best for our tax dollars by holding them accountable with stakeholder involvement!!!
CPS will fail miserably and I can't help but think this is all by design...two words to think about...Charter-Schools.
CPS will fail miserably and I can't help but think this is all by design...two words to think about...Charter-Schools.
WTF is going on? Education is a PEOPLE business. Well, at least it used to be.
December 2008 was an interesting time. Where could you get information about the selective enrollment schools and the elusive applications?
I went to the fifth floor at Clark St. every day during the last week up until December 19, 2008. The directories were not out and available. "School and Community Relations" (that famous locked office that's supposed to be open to the public down the hall from the Board chambers) kept giving me a "Duh!" when I asked for the current one.
I marked each one I did pick up -- last year's.
They also weren't in the public libraries, and the aldermen didn't see them, if they did at all, until after the deadline (December 19). Whatever the schools had, well...
Like IMPACT and so many things, those oversights (actually, huge blunders) had no impact on careers at CPS. If anything, the people inside CPS who sabotaged such things as information (on the Web or in print) for parents to choose public schools (as opposed to these novelty thingies -- charters mostly -- that are more marketing department than reality) have been (again) given promotions. Or picked up by all the multi-million dollar corporate entities (Renaissance Schools Fund; the not-for-profits) pushing this massive privatization scam. If you've rehearsed your lines about markets and "choice" and have brushed up on your Atlas Shrugged (especially the lurid parts; the ones that turned on Ayn Rand and Alan Greenspan back in the day), you've got a future. Just ask John Galt and his "Solutions." This stuff is even too implausible for fiction.
We sure do need copy editors. And managers who are supposed to establish and meet deadlines, not subvert them in the interest of a higher cause (like "markets" and "choice").
I was tracking their distribution because of that deadline. And it was not met. Not in print. Not on line. Not anywhere where real parents would have to be to navigate the process.
Then what happened was ever more interesting.
The "New Schools Expo" (Soldier Field) offered thousands of kids the "choice" to get into the charters (since they had been manipulated into missing the deadline for the selective enrollment schools unless they really were savvy about navigating the system).
And there were directories by the truckload all over the Soldier Field site. And all the charter schools waiting to help out the families that had been unable to learn enough to get their kids lined up in time for the December 19 deadline.
Then, of course, the Arne Duncan Hit List (2009 edition) came out, and hundreds of parents and thousands of kids learned that their schools were being closed (phased out; turnarounded; reconstituted; closed; or "consolidated") four weeks too late to apply for any of the selective enrollment schools. By February 1, 2009, when the "hearings" (presided over by CPS attorneys in drag, most of them long-term contractors with strong CPS ties, as I reported) were in full swing, the parents were demanding to know why the Hit List had come out after the deadline for the selective enrollment schools.
Charter schools forced choice anyone?
The whole thing was scam and snake oil.
And then Arne Duncan could go around the USA talking about all those charter school waiting lists in Chicago as "proof" that Chicago's families chose charters (rather than being forced into them by Duncan's machintations). Duncan began prattling about those so-called "waiting lists" (along with Phyllis Lockett and all the other charter touts) a couple of years ago, while refusing to every release them, or to answer my ten times asked question to his face: "How big is the waiting list for Whitney Young?"
Sorry.
The whole thing in 2008-2009 was a structured manipulation of families, parents and children. And a big part of that manipulation was the unconscionable delays in the directories, their distribution, and every other form of precise accurate communication with the families of Chicago.
Did I just hear yesterday, during the discussion with the last speaker at the Board, that all of the kindergarten kids from Carpenter were going to "the charter school"? Or was that all the pre-kindergarten kids?
After, of course, being massaged by David Pickens, Michael Scott, and Greg Minniefield (Scott's $100,000 a year coat holder who's sitting there while Ron Huberman prattles about how tough the budget choices are this year).
Right.
So tough that Huberman sat there three months ago with a straight face while CPS hired Minniefield back at more than $100,000 a year. And voted to pay "expenses" to the Board members of $24,000 per year -- with $36,000 per year going to Michael Scott, as President of the Board.
This stuff is nasty. The difference is that this year hundreds more people are tracking every lie in real time, and keeping close watch on every secret meeting Scott tries to hold behind the scenes to calm down some parents (like Carpenter) up in arms because his regime is screwing another schools and the thousand children in it.
The funniest thing about "Ogden High School" (the infection that's destroying Carpenter) is that the prissy parents of the Real Ogden are having second thoughts about sending their children across the Kennedy to go to school in THAT NEIGHBORHOOD with THEM. Didn't Michael tell them that the "new" Ogden was going to be a few blocks west of the Gold Coast? Can you imagine, Michael, what it would have been like if those families had been told they were going to have to send their children to Douglas Park with another brand of THEM?
Game's up. Interesting run. Just like Wall Street, the scams of CPS are now going to be weighed in the scales of history.
And every word will be "memorialized." You can count on that.
The principal knew nothing of it. He called HR immediately and found that the position numbers were closing because the funding source was changing. But instead of telling the teachers that they were being switched from one position number to another, HR just told them their positions were closed. No name or number to contact anyone.
HR needs communication skills? You bet.
Tell me that is fair. The ones that make a lot of money, tend to be the ones who do the least work, in my experience.
They are lying about appeals--appeals from principals were rejected months ago. BTW-were more black teachers laid off now?
According to the Secretary of CPS, the "Action" agenda (which includes all of the actions taken after discussion in executive session) won't be out until Monday. It is in the "Action" agenda that anyone can read the administrative appointments that have been made since January 1, 2009. And the position titles, such as they are.
According to the Secretary, there were 11 Board Reports appointing new people to top positions Wednesday. Who they, what their titles are, and how much each is to be paid will be part of the "Action" agenda in a few days.
Rather than blog this story in pieces, we expect to do a complete one (at least for the very "top") based on who is the new "In" and who was purged. As we've already reported, this is the biggest purge at the top in CPS history (that includes the 1979 and 1980 financial crisis purges) and the biggest increase in new executive positions into jobs that never existed before, but suddenly exist with enormous power.
Lastly...
The screwball way in which this was handled (basically, creating executive jobs for a chosen few outsiders, while purging experienced insiders, without any reorganization plan) is also major "news." On Tuesday, I went to CPS and asked for The Plan. By that I meant (and made clear) that I wanted the Reorganization Plan. They may have had the right to argue (although it was using a loophole) that they didn't have to reveal the names and positions they were creating on the June 24 Agenda, but they could not claim that a Reorganization Plan was exempt from the 48 hour rule under the Open Meetings Act.
So they just moved ahead and created the positions, and put people in them, without a Plan.
This is supposedly the Mayoral Control "Business Model" that is now being exported from Chicago to the rest of the USA. It's been fundamentally a dictatorship plan chunked full of patronage from the day CPS arrived on Clark St. The Clark St. deal was courtesy of that $100 million move from Pershing Road that was supposed to "streamline" things if Paul Vallas's babblings were to be taken serious by anyone except the Sun-Times and Tribune editorial boards. Of course, the Clark St. move had nothing to do with taking an obsolete building off the hands of Commonwealth Edison...
This stuff would be funny if it were done on the Main Stage at Second City or subject to The Daily Show. But the huge number of people being destroyed by it is not one bit funny. Having been through a couple of purges myself (fired by CPS in August 2000 by a public vote of the Board; treated to a Donald Trump imitation from Marilyn Stewart at CTU in August 2004), I have some opinions about how a true "Human Resources" approach does these things with people who have worked for the system.
The best negative example in town right now is how CPS has been doing these purges, both at the local school level (which everyone has now heard of, thanks to CORE and substancenews.net) and at the central office level (which is slowly beginning to come out thanks to District299 and a couple of courageous central office people).
Transparency is a joke in this context. The Chicago Board of Education has approved a huge number of additional executive level appointments at its February, March, April, May and June 2009 meetings with no public discussion. And these are supposedly the "business" geniuses who are going to lead the public schools of the USA into Arne's Brave New World of corporate "school reform."
The word hypocrite just doesn't do justice to the depth and breadth of their work. And that's without even talking about the teachers and other staffs who had their careers cremated at Johnson, Bethune, Fenger and the other "turnaround" schools during those dismal weeks leading up to June 12, 2009.
Those human beings are going to be heard from next, and for a long time to come. Count on it.
I cannot help but wonder what criteria the brain trust of ITS used in determining who was given their walking papers. Hard work, ethics and devotion be damned. It is obvious that kissing rear was the determinant factor rather than that of performance. Or, was the theory of "relativity" used? ITS survivors include the good friends and relatives of the ITS elite few. Isn't nepotism against policy?
Great restructuring plan, ITS now has more managers than people to do the work. ITS will once again employ more overpriced consultants to fill in for those of us who produced the majority of the work. Hmmm, try and guess which companies will benefit. Is there a pattern here?
Subterfuge, lies, partial work days. Secretaries open office doors in the morning to give the illusion that the bosses are in. Great leadership by example.
Hari, wasn't the director of Change Management formerly known as the Knowledge Manager (or something to that effect)? Changing titles must be the primary focus of the director of Change Management. Along with each title change comes an increase in pay, so this guy gets paid to rename his own job title. Can I apply for the job? You see, due to unforeseen circumstances, I am currently seeking employment and that job sounds awesome.
Mr. Russo: Please keep tabs on whether the IMPACT Web site will be improved. It is worthless now with no robust search engine or a useful knowledge base. I have prior experience working to optimize Web sites for search but that offer to help clean it up was turned down not too long before all of this happened.
Speaking of diligence, dedication, conscientiousness and an undisputed love for the job—there was not a finer example of such than Stacy Butler-Cross. This woman was dismissed literally months after being promoted and given a staff to be trained to carry out the job that she had performed single handedly prior to their arrival. It is my understanding that her partially trained former staff was retained. Yet another example of personal issues being allowed to outweigh exceptional performance.
Oh...but then it was stated during the extremely brief ‘layoff communication’, or lack thereof, that the layoffs had “nothing to do with job performance. But shouldn’t performance have been a factor? Is it acceptable that select friends, relatives and those that prefer the same color spectrum keep their jobs, irrespective of performance? Incredible!
The cuts downtown demonstrate to me that clout rules.
In the old days clout came from inside the Board structure,
and was almost Neanderthal in practice.
From the gatekeepers at 228 N La Salle to the teacher counselors
behind the big mahogany doors at teacher personal it was a crap
shoot where you were assigned. Throw in a system that tried to
integrate teachers, not students and Black went North , White
went South, so to create an illusion of compliance to Brown.
I once had a freshman Alderman tell me even he had trouble
with teacher personal. That is not the case now.
A friend of mine lost their job in this round of cuts .I will
Not use this persons name ,out of respect. This person
Did most of the work for the entire department, I hope this person lands on
Their feet. It was a crime to let this person go.
Let us not forget some of the vanquished, like my friend, carried
entire programs on their backs. Who will pick up the slack?
Not the remaining Trolls with clout.
Well, in theory, the performance management system that Mr. Huberman is putting in place will identify those people who are doing their jobs well and those who are not. And those who are not will lose their jobs.
Whether or not he is successful in implementing the theory into practice seems to me a fair metric on which to judge Mr. Huberman's own job performance.
Pray tell, what's a "Metric"? How is it different from an "Objective", an "Outcome," or a "Goal"?
Stop, before it's too late. When you use The Man's jargon, you fall into the trap of HUBERTHINK. "Metrics" have nothing to do with it. It's a pretentious term, "a tale told by an idiot... signifying nothing."
Principals will be tightened on the Metric rack if they go along with this nonsense, and then they will in turn pass down the paranoia. Or everyone can just go to the Board -- and across the city and the USA -- and proclaim that we've just escaped from the Mat Hatter's Tea Party, and we're still trying to evict the Queen of Hearts and his myrmidons from the Throne Room.
So here's an assignment for your assignation metricfreaks...
When the Agenda of Action comes out Monday with PO1 on it (that's the official version of the "Metrics" to evaluation schools -- which has already proved that 60 percent of the city's public high schools are "failing"), get a copy.
Read the whole thing.
Then ask the latest ITERATION of the Chicago CHIEF OFFICER FOR RESEARCH EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY (I think his/her/its name is Thor Thunder or something exotic like that, definitely one of those guys with an MBA and a post-modern head of hair) for the Power Point presentation he utilized while explaining all these METRICS to the august members of the BOARD (who proceeded to vote unanimously and without debate to approve its imposition on the schools for the coming year with a sort of straight face).
Then ask THOR for an explanation of what all that gibberish means. And, just to sweeten the questions, whether the College Board approves of a school district like CPS utilizing, say, AP data for high stakes. Just ask him. Then ask for the letter saying so, signed by an official of The College Board.
Same same with the ACT.
Actually (and this is really cool) same same with the ISAT and Prairie State.
Get back to us on that.
Of call the Daily Show and tell them Chicago's come up with another script that couldn't have been created by America's greatest satirists. And this time it's not some extemporaneous remarks from America's GREATEST MAYOR, but another round of STANDARDS AND ACCOUNTABILITY metrices from AMERCIA'S GREATEST CHARTER SCHOOL SYSTEM.
Whoops.
The Metric Racking is only done to the public schools.
Charters are out there in deregulation land. Like Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns were a couple of years ago.
My buddy has already lost the job. Part of the problem was this
Persons lack of self promotion. Always willing to help anyone it was knowledge that got the job. Passed over for promotion, then fired I hope the lesson was learned
In the board it is not enough to do your job. It is not enough to do your bosses job
Ether, or half the departments. What counts is image not substance.
I cannot wait for the whole department to crash as I am sure it will.
Because the shiny, slick, connected, clout heavy people that are still
There do not have a clue what to do, my friend always did everything
Quiet competency is not enough anymore.
You do know that Huberman now has some bloke in some position having to do with performance management technology, don't you? If that isn't gobbledygook, I don't know what is. And this guy came over from the CTA, I believe, and is now highly placed in Huberman's cabinet.
I also know a lot of people have been critical of Bob Runcie on this blog. However, having known him briefly, I think he would have handled this with a lot more class than Arshele Stevens at ITS.
Ether, or half the departments. What counts is image not substance.
This doesn't exactly warrant a newsflash.
It's true in vast swaths of the corporate world.
It's true in many non-profits.
It's certainly true in governmental industries.
It's true in my current school and at all previous schools I've worked.
Then, CPS with alderman Soilis, closed it down.
This closure only brought a bad image to Solis and his father daley.
Let’s not forget that Arshele Stevens reports directly to Robert Wellington Runcie, the newly appointed Chief Administrative Officer with a salary running dangerously close to that of the CEO. Although there is no excuse for the “classless low-rent” way the layoffs were handled by Mrs. Stevens, I would be very surprised if Mr. Runcie was not fully aware of what was going on and the insulting approach that was used. Shame on all of them!
Dear Same As It Ever was
You are correct ,as far as you go. However, you forgot to mention
That corporations, non profits, and government industries usually have
A person I’ll call Ms McCarthy in the back someplace.
She is the one who actually knows what to do and how to do it.
She has a direct line to payroll, calls department heads by their first name.
Young professionals hate her because none of the self promoting skills
honed in college work on her. God help the sub who sits at her place in
the lunch room.
But the old goat defines the word competent. Everything going
Up the chain of command is perfect. And nobody, nobody messes with
her department or school or boss. She had a heart of gold and the hide of a rino.
We have always survived these purges because of the old rock solid
People filling critical but largely taken for granted positions.
The Peter Principal is very much alive.
I was always taught that "self-praise is no praise" but I keep hearing strains of the newbie chant "if you do not blow your own horn no one else will...must have taken a self-promotion class instead of how to teach reading class...
Let me try again as I may not have been clear the first time.
As someone else has pointed out, employees who promote themselves often get noticed above those who don't even when it's the latter doing the work and the self-promoter taking credit for it. Some people by their nature dislike "tooting their own horn," as it were, while others use every opportunity to tell you just how important they are.
Still, the "squeaky wheel gets the grease," as they say, and the self-promoters become the promoted (or retained) by their supervisors. This may happen because the supervisors honestly don't know who is doing the work and who isn't.
As I understand the performance management process that Mr. Huberman wants to implement, each employee's performance is measured and appraised against set objectives which put the quiet and unassuming worker on an equal playing field with the boisterous and self-promoting worker. It becomes more difficult for one to take credit for the work of another.
I say all this in response to your point that the reorganization at Central Office is all about who you know and office politics rather than quality and effectiveness of the work done.
Naturally, the rub is in translating the theory into practice.
And if Mr. Huberman can pull that off, then I think he should be judged as having done a good job managing the organization. It remains to be seen.
Thanks Danny I get your idea.
The jury is still very much out on Mr Huberman.I sincerely
wish him luck.
I would offer this advice; it’s an old cliché but very true.
Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer.
Dear DRMDT
Look up a web- site called” Follow the money”
It should give you all the info a layman
Can easily gather.
Same pattern of abuse of power. Fire teachers, then leave or get fired yourself. Systemic lack of consistency and continuity destabilizing schools, all preventable but allowed to continue under the authority of CPS central office administrators.
there are policies that punish this activity in the employee discipline code.
EDC 5-15 Engaging in any act or conduct prohibited by Board Rules, Municipal Code of the City of Chicago, the Illinois Compiled Statutes, applicable laws of other states, or federal statutes that may be deemed irremediable conduct.
EDC 5-17 Violating the School rules, or Board rules, policies or procedures which result in behaviors that grossly disrupt the orderly educational process in the classroom, in the school, and may occur on or off school grounds or assigned work location.
Fire, displace, cut, harass, intimidate teachers would that disrupt a school?
drk
All these unwanted admins in central and in the areas do NOT have to be on the list--they will be asigned as interum principals--way ahead of everyone who deserves it more.
And IF the head and others in HS are booted out--I HOPE THEY GET probatins schools, not nice little HS, where they can really gt a taste of what they have done and allowed to HS teachers and leaders who do what they can to turn their HSs around.
These adminstrators have friends and it is time for their friends to pay up, so they have jobs and their tenure resotred.
how will these administrator castoffs replace current working teachers? there is no system wide seniority...
i mean, i suppose any teacher that's hired is replacing someone somewhere. but i don't think that's the point you're trying to make. enlighten us.
tic toc tic toc.
I haven't read a thing in this thread today that will come to pass.
It was generally from 1979 - 1982, the years of the "School Finance Authority" layoffs. By 1981-82 school year, CPS had reduced the total number of employees from roughly 48,000 to about 40,000 after the contrived "financial crisis" that began with the lowering of the bond ratings in November 1979. The Board then was at 228 N. LaSalle St. A lot of those central people retired, but many did wind up in the schools.
By 1989, when the first Mayor Daley "reform" Board of Education (remember: James Compton, President of the Board; Bill Singer, Vice President and hatchet man; Mary Dempsey chief legal hatchet person) took over, the administrators could not "bump" cleanly back into schools. There was a separation of teacher seniority from administrator. If you wanted to be an administrator (including principal) you went off track from your teacher rights.
Right now, not one of the people being closed out in Central Office (or the "Areas") has the right to "bump" anyone anywhere, because "bumping" (system-wide seniority) no longer exists. The people who've been closed out in the areas and the various outposts of central officer (there are about six, the largest of which is at 125 S. Clark St., if you recall) currently have to get a principal to hire them if they want to become "teachers" again.
What is of equal importance is that Huberman is also making massive cuts in the schools. That's what CORE was beginning to articulate last Wednesday at the Board meeting, and what we've been reporting at substancenews.net. To take just two people who spoke at the Board meeting:
Kristine Mayle has been cut from a teaching position because the Board closed De La Cruz.
Blair Nayder was informed by e-mail that she had been closed out of her position at CVCA for reasons that were bizarre.
Both tenured teachers. There were others, not tenured, who were also going over what happened. The number of position closings is enormous, both in central office and in the schools. And the pretext for the closings is that lie about the $475 million "deficit" that Huberman and Scott went to the media with three months ago.
Yes...
It's a lie.
Next time you see one of them, ask them how they could have a $475 million "deficit" when the Board's (various) reserves are hovering at nearly $500 million. That's like having $100,000 in your checking account, but ignoring it and claiming you're broke.
The lies about the budget this year are the greatest I've ever heard, and that's going back 30 years. I first began paying attention to the budget back in 1979, when many of our careers were facing destruction because of the "School Financial Crisis."
Those "reserve" funds are so great at this point that every the rating agencies (which are always preaching the Board's Party Line) can't ignore them. Once they passed five percent of gross operations budget (which they did three years ago, under Arne and Michael Scott), there was no logical of fiscal basis for letting them grow.
But you can't fan a "crisis" unless you can lie about a "deficit." This year, the economic crisis just makes it easier for them to gull the general public (and the reporters for the corporate media) with the Big Lie.
I would bet that not one of the other media covering CPS even has a copy of the most recent CAFRs. Not just the last one, but, say, the last five of them. Heck. They probably don't even know what a CAFR is. Given the destruction being caused by these cuts (in Central and in the regular public schools), that's incredible. But it's one of the reasons why so much of Chicago (including many who pundit around here) is caught and mired so deeply in the generalized ignorance.
The funds needed to back up bonds are very clear and CPS has a legal obligation to maintain those funds. The audits of these funds are done annually. However, the stabilization fund is much more abstract and when it is used or not used in relation to fiscal problems is not established by any Board rule. In fact the rules do not even require a formal vote of the Board for their utilization only that an informal "consensus" of Board members exist that it be used.
I think clear rules should be adopted about when the stabilization fund should be used.
Rod Estvan
Six weeks severence is more than in previous ousters. When our positions were closed, they didn't even pay us the 2 weeks they promised. Stupid payroll clerks in the department even 'docked' me for an upcoming sick day I was no longer around to take.
How do you know if the 24 retired principals' positions are still available. I know one of them. I am a member of the LSC that replaced her because she was retiring, unfortunately. I wished she wanted her contract renewed. Probably most if not all of those openings have been filled by the LSCs!
This document -
http://www.cps-humanresources.org/Sbs_TCH_Cal.pdf
calls the 1/2 paycheck on May 1 a 'supplemental' check. The reason you did not realize this was happening is because the memos did not mention where the 'supplemental' was coming from. Instead of paying people on May 1 for the two weeks preceding, that check was cobbled from money they took from your deferred pay, your summer pay. They nicked a day from each of the five paychecks you will receive this summer. effectively docking you one day's pay per pay period.
Ok, so let's just assume I accept that Payroll's need to 'align' paydays supercedes my need to pay the mortgage and Visa on time so I don't go into foreclosure and/or have my credit account go into the 30% interest bracket.
Except - if you consult the document in the link above, the shorted (9 day) paychecks are supposed to start on July 17, not July 3rd. Today's check is supposed to be for 10 days.
Please note, Alexander, that even though you assume I lack the vigor and zeal of the young, I managed to wade through the memo sh**storm, comprehend the bs it contained, and still pinpointed where the bs contradicts itself.
I do not understand your point, but thre are 67 on the list looking for principal jobs--how many have gotten one, and have the LSCs really hired those from that list? Watch, all these layed off administrators will be GIVEN a principalship!
To: All Employees
From: Human Resources
Payroll Services
Date: January 20, 2009
Re: Changes to the Payroll Calendar
The Chicago Public Schools (CPS)
...
"The change will not result in the loss of pay to any employee. It will only affect how long after the end of the
payroll period you are paid. However, during the transition to the new Payroll Calendar, the change will
impact employee groups as follows:
For 38.6, 42.6, and 44.6 week Teachers (teachers on deferred pay):
• Teachers on deferred pay will not receive the Pay Period 9 pay check on May 1, 2009.
• Teachers on deferred pay will be paid 5-days pay from their deferred pay bank on May 1, 2009.
• Teachers on deferred pay will receive the Pay Period 9 paycheck on May 8, 2009 and shall be paid
every two weeks thereafter, 13 calendar days after the end of the payroll period in which they worked.
• Over the summer, Teachers on deferred pay will be paid the balance of their deferred pay at a rate of
9 days per pay period or other pro rata amount as appropriate to offset the 5 days paid from the
deferred bank on May 1st."
...
This memo in particular does not say when that would be taken out. But I have to ask, does it really matter? The whole point of getting your deferred pay in the beginning was to "ease the transition." you should be 5 days ahead in your bank account, not worried about "paying your mortgage on 9 days instead of 10."
There are a few Assistant Principal vacancies.
As for PEP, there is a minimum age requierment to get retirement benefits. You can take PEP, but you MUST be 55 to get your pension. If you are not 55--YOU ARE SCREWED!
If Ron had stayed with the CTA he would have received a pension AND full social security-we are under the SS Windfall Rostenkowsi bill which reduces our SS benefits (some teachers work second jobs and pay into SS) to what amounts to a stipend-I hope this is explained to career changers who apply at CPS.
You feel like post-nuclear tap-dancing ? Fine; explain the fax notices to schools telling them the teachers could ask to flip the half check/full check paydays if (ahem) they could not pay their mortgages and gave them till the end of that same day to do so, as if schoolteachers are standing around the office fax machine waiting to see what Central Office wants us to do by the end of the day in order to get paid(besides educate children). What does that tell you about how well planned the rollout was, that nobody thought of the repercussions, only of the problems it would solve for Arne & Co.?
Any time left over after that? Tell us how it was that hundreds of employees woke up yesterday to find they'd been locked out of the network, and their e-mail accounts suspended. IT claims they are not cuts, yet people who called IT were being told to call HR, leading people to believe they'd been fired.
You people are a stroke. But fine, don't speak up as they round up and exterminate your colleagues and the people you are supposed to be serve.
Just don't expect anyone to be around to speak up when they come for you.
If people drop dead with the Board owing them a year's worth of pension payments - well, then that money can be confiscated and booked as loan interest against the horrific deficit created by the Board's ten year 'pension holiday', since they have not been paying into the teachers' pension fund for over a decade now. It's the landlord's security deposit at the mega scale...
Problem solved!
Huberman made cuts without a plan because he is there to destabilize the system -- top to 'bottom' -- and privatize as much as possible. I was actually shocked when I tried to get the June 24 Action Agenda on July 2 and was told it wasn't ready yet because Huberman was still working on it.
Actually, he was re-creating it. Since January, when he was appointed, he has been making executive appointments without them going through the Board agendas. He has continued through this week. He also created a new system reorganization plan without going through the Board.
The sheer audacity of it is unprecedented, but it's likely to be ignored because (a) my colleagues in the corporate media simply transcribe handouts, and (b) the people who are closest to the debacles (that's a deliberate plural) are not talking to those of us who would
put the pieces together and
write the truth
I had to wait around the 6th floor yesterday for a half hour to get the Personnel Actions that came out of executive session more than a week earlier! And everyone went home for the July 4 long weekend without an Action Agenda published, either in print or on line. Why? The new CEO is massaging everything, in violation of the law, to create things his wacky way ex post facto.
Just to give a few examples that are not yet made public (from the Action Agenda which I insisted on getting because it's been "law" since the Board voted "yes" on everything in mid-afternoon June 24).
Bob Runcie is now "Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer" (that's a new title, if I'm not mistaken) at grade 10, at a salary of $179,166.67.
Michael Shields ("New Employee") is now Director of Security (a grade 9) at an annual salary of $150,000 per year. That's more than 10 percent higher than Andres Durbak was being paid.
Monique Bond is "Communications Officer, Department of Communications" at a salary of $130,380 per year. That, too, is higher than anyone ever made in that department.
Meanwhile, the Skippies and Buffies (the young guys and gals who are coming in from Huberland by the truckload) generally are showing up with no educational training or experience, and often not even the "MBA" that seems to be the closest thing Huberland has to a Type 75. But some of them have no degrees at all.
Yesterday, I asked Michael Scott whether the Board was going to order the Freedom of Information Officer to release the curriculum vitaes, work histories, and resumes of all these new executives, since he was among those voting to approve their careers in public service, at salaries above $120,000 per person per year.
He said "Yes."
I'll let you know when I get these papers. Needless to say, it will be interesting to see the latest and most absurd iteration of complete clout in CPS since all this nonsense began with Mayoral Control 14 years ago.
As to the crew (posse? these are all really cool guys and gals right?) Ronnie brought over from the Chicago Transit Authority. Everyone knows that the best training to operate a school system in the USA today is experience running a screwed up public transit system.
Rumor also was that without Huberman to protect them, the Hubermaniacs at CTA couldn't walk around without a bodyguard. With those silly "data driven" meetings and all that prattle about "You're either on the bus with me or off the bus..." they had made a lot of enemies.
Some of whom will find them over at CPS eventually. I'll be there to cover that part of the story. We'll headline it "Justice."
The worst part here is that the news media continues to report spurious information including "those let go from central office will receive a severance and money to look for new jobs". NONE of that is true. Hari stated it best in the original email that started this blog...this is a mass screwing of all those unfortunate enough to be caught up in this MADNESS!
'Had' is the operative word. I posted about this on Thursday and went back to double check the shill's rhetoric ('can't you read, it was clearly yada yada yada') and copy the link to the 'side by side' comparison.
Today, I went back to the website and 'poof'! the memos and charts are gone.
In their place is the following statement and hot links to documents dated July 3rd-
Attention CPS Employees on Deferred Pay Plan
In an effort to improve the consistency of deferred pay during the summer, Payroll Services is pleased to announce an improved deferred pay summer calculation payout for 2009. For all ten month employees (excluding 60/20 employees) a new calculation method will be used to pay out deferred pay during the summer months.
Click on the links below for more information:
Summer Deferred Pay
Summer Deferred Pay Personal Calculator
Anyone noting what the 'improvement' is, feel free to post here.
Personally I think they need to work on their communication and timings skills.
Huberman is cooking the books at every level, and Michael Scott and the Board members are right there with him doing it. As I reported earlier, for the first time in history, the Action Agenda from the June 24 Board of Education meeting was not available immediately after the meeting. Usually, the printed Action Agenda is available either on Friday or Monday. As of the beginning of July, it was still not available. Why? Because the Board voted on stuff it hadn't really voted on because the "CEO" was adjusting what the Board was voting on -- ex post facto.
I finally waited around at CPS Thursday (July 2, 2009), surprised, demanding to read the personnel information that was voted on by the Chicago Board of Education on June 24, 2009. In other words, the actions had been taken eight days earlier, but the actions were not "public information" because the Actions were not really Actions until the Chief Executive Officer decided what they really were at the time the Actions became Actions.
Which is why you may not be able to read the Action Agenda at the new crazy CPS "public" Web site tomorrow (July 6, 2009), even though all these people appointed by Ron Huberman are drawing enormous salaries and (again, ex post factor) taking legal action in spending enormous sums of money in the name of the taxpayers of the City of Chicago, State of Illinois, and, of course, those of us in need of "stimulus" from the Obama/Duncan team in D.C.
But I digress.
Here is one of the Board Reports you will eventually get to read when the public is allowed to know what Ron Huberman and the Board are up to.
There are many of them.
<p><b>June 24, 2009.</b></p> BOARD REPORT 09-0624-EX10 — APPROVE APPOINTMENT OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER EFFECTIVE MAY 1, 2009, AND RATIFY ALL LAWFUL ACTIONS TAKEN AS CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER SINCE MAY 1, 2009 (ROBERT RUNCIE)... NAME, Robert Runcie. <p><b>FROM</b></p>: Functional Title: Executive Officer. External Title: Chief Information Officer. Position Number 242650. Pay Band 10. BASIC SALARY: $179,166.67.
<p><b>To</b></p>: Functional Title, Executive Officer. External Title: Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Operating Officer. Position Number 262996. Pay Band: 10. Basic Salary: See Financial and Personnel Implications.
FINANCIAL: The expenditure contain in this report is contained in the FT 2009 Budget and will be contained in the FT 2010 Budget. Salary increases associated with this appointment, if any, will be determined in conjunction with the FY 2010 Budget. PERSONNEL IMPLICATIONS: Any salary increase associated with this appointment will be determined in conjunction with the FT 2010 Budget and submitted for approval to the Board.
I thought Paul Vallas was a disaster, as history has made clear.
We wrote about all the ways Arne Duncan was an even larger mess, down to documenting hundreds of his lies.
Even I have been surprised at the churzpah of Ron Huberman and his merry team of mercenaries.
And the flaccid impotence of corporate Chicago -- and its media mavens -- in the face of what amounts to a coup d'etat that should even worry them.
Several were devistated. As of now, there will be new jobs being posted for positions with different titles on next weeks e-bulletin. Some of these people could reapply; however, many won't be asked back. The coordinators currently have their jobs because someone has to create the PD for the upcoming year; however, their jobs are being redeifined and they will have to work for a fraction of their salary. The two teams attached to grants, Reading First and Striving Readers are fine. Elizabeth Cardaneus-Lopez has been temporarily in charge of the Office of Lteracy until there is a new manager chosen.
As for the "team" now looking for jobs, some of them were excellent and some needed to go (just like at any job. Adonia and Sandee got what they deserved! I have never met two more unfriendly, incapable "managers" in my life! Many of the debocles that happened in the Office of Lteracy were due to them not knowing what the hell they were doing! Others, like a couple of evaluators and Tara were really great at what they did. I hope they have the opportunity to get a position back.
Jodi is another story. We have been telling her for years to go back and get her Type 75. She never did. So, now that she is out of the Office of Literacy (and she will most certainly be one of the people that they won't ask back) what will she do? She was making a HUGE salery and now...what? She can't even be an administrator within the system. She doesn't have the credentials. She is super smart and knows literacy; however, she certainly will no longer be making the same money as she was at OL. She will probably go to a university or turn to consulting, unless she finds a director position at a suburban district (at this time most of those types of positions will have been filled. On top of that, in the suburbs, many of these positions still require a Type 75.)
Soon, the entire country will be on the basal series. Lovely! That's what the mayor wants and he has the perfect person in Xavier Botana to help him accomplish this! Now, with Arne being Sec of Ed... the entire country will be on a basal series. The poor kids who are either above reading level or below reading level.
Albert John Dunlap (born July 26, 1937) is a professional corporate downsizer popularly known as "Chainsaw Al" and "Rambo in Pinstripes". CNBC has named Dunlap as one of the "Worst American CEOs of All Time", and he is barred from serving as an officer or director of any public company as a result of his conduct at Sunbeam Corp.
By firing thousands of employees at once and closing plants and factories, he has drastically altered the economic status of such corporations as Scott Paper and Crown Zellerbach; however, when he attempted to use his methods to increase the share price of the Sunbeam-Oster Corporation, this backfired dramatically as despite Sunbeam's stock rising from $12 a share to $53 temporarily, it plummeted back down to $11 within four months.
Industry insiders revealed that Sunbeam's revenues had been padded because Dunlap had given large discounts to retailers who bought far more merchandise than they could handle; the excess merchandise was shipped to warehouses to be delivered later, but the sales revenue was booked immediately. With the stores hopelessly overstocked, unsold inventory piled up in Sunbeam's warehouses. Investors grew edgy, then panicky, and Dunlap himself was fired. He agreed to pay $15 million to settle a shareholder lawsuit.
Chainsaw Al defrauded investors by firing thousands of workers
Dunlap drove Sunbeam into the ground
Chainsaw Al’s Reputation Backfires
Dunlap handsomely rewarded loyalty
What about math & science coaches? (worthless scum - they are the only ones I am not sorry about. Walking through like nazis asking about word walls, and too much BS to even mention. Good riddance. the only problem is they'll be back in schools acting holier than thou.
Not as good as above, but a try.
by name, by nature
(Danny, you'll have to look it up)
Please nicknames are serious business.
It's insulting and ridiculous! I feel like I'm reliving the initial classless and low-rent dismissal that I received courtesy of the new Chief Information Officer. Will it ever end?
They let him "save face" by resigning instead of firing him. I heard he was going to Oregon. Good bye! Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out! He was horrible!!
I don't know much about Lach, other than to say that he has now resigned. Don't know where he is going or what the circumstances were surrounding his resignation.
Office of Math and Science (according to a manager there) are going to see the same type of cuts in August as what the Office of Literacy had in July. If this is the case, most of the management at CMSI will be out as well (however, they are posting new positions with different titles...their way of getting rid of anyone that they don't want back).
This continues to get crazier and crazier by the day!
Those are the kinds of things people have to deal with when they have been ruthlessly purged (like most of the people who've been Hubermanned) or forced to "resign" (like a few).
I have three bits of advice, in order.
First, straighten out your access to medical benefits and make sure you get all the necessary paperwork.
Second, apply for unemployment compensation immediately. Given the state of the economy, you may be getting this small benefit for as long as 12 months, and believe me, it can be a lifesaver (although it's clearly a disappointment after a CPS salary).
Third, sue the SOBs. Even if you have been told you are an "at will" employee, you'll have more leverage filing a complaint than if you simply try to make a few phone calls.
When you've covered yourself and your family as best you can, get in touch with us. As you know, we expanded our reporting staff to the largest in history over the past 12 months (during the same time we revamped our Web site).
Every news organization is only as good as its sources. Our sources have never been better, and they will soon be better still.
As everyone knows, if Substance agrees that you are "off the record," you are "off the record." In 34 years (soon to be 35) we have never burned a source. I'm assuming that the next 24 months will reveal some of the most incredible stuff, and we will be glad to double check every fact and then put it in print (in the monthly Substance) and on the Web (at www.substancenews.net).
There are very few people to whom I'd say "Good riddance" when they lose their jobs. So far, not one of those purged by the Daley Boys (and Girls) is on that list. We're easy to get in contact with.
Is it true that one department (Office of New Schools) has been expanding while everyone else is getting hammered in this Huberization of CPS? In other words, we need to expand privatization, but can destroy every other service.
And if it's not true, please let me know who is now gone. I have the position files to double check, as you know.


Digg
Del.icio.us
Mail

