They Were Warned - A Year Ago Kudos and thanks to blog reader Gale who took the time to dig up Board warning resolutions from a year ago that were adopted both principals who were just removed. Here is the full list of April 08 warning resolutions:
| 08-0423-EX12 | Gloria Cortes, Principal, Agustin Lara Academy | *Adopted |
| 08-0423-EX13 | Deborah Edwards-Clay, Principal, Brian Piccolo Elementary School | *Adopted |
| 08-0423-EX14 | Clifton Hunt, Principal, Richard J. Oglesby Elementary School | *Adopted |
| 08-0423-EX15 | Patricia Markstone, Tenured Teacher, Gresham Elementary School | *Adopted |
| 08-0423-EX16 | Marie Miles, Principal, Chicago Vocational Career Academy | *Adopted |
| 08-0423-EX17 | Susan Weston, Tenured Teacher, Coles Model for Excellence School | *Adopted |
| 08-0423-EX18 | Darreyl Young-Gibson, Principal, Percy Julian High School |
Thanks, Gale! Here's the link to the Board report. Unfortunately, the principal at her school is not on the list. However, I do wonder what's happened to the rest (and to the other warnings that are adopted each month).
1. World Language: they had an incompetent principal that was bullied by the other 3 and they put her to be a coach in another area; they hired an old foggy named Alice Phillips and she almost had an heart attack last year; I heard she is leaving the school this year.
2. Infinity: the mecca of the 4, still worthless; the principal Irizarry is known for being a dictator and everybody hates her; however, she is staying this year because the Infinity's scores were higher than the other three.
3. MAS: Jose Rico, [text removed -- unsupported accusation of criminal activity] today I heard that he got some position with Duncan in DC... The matter of fact is that he's leaving but nobody really knows exactly why, right?
4. SJ: The fatso Rito Martinez got caught in a lie but also he was caught doing nothing other than "mentor" kids buying them pizza whenever they did something wrong. I heard he got the principal job at one of the Morton Schools in Cicero.
Next, he can move on to the bad teachers that are only in their positions thanks to the Union!
Within a year, maybe we'll get rid of all the bad prinicipals and baad teachers!
Is that true about Martinez? If so, I hope it was Morton West as that's the high school for my neighborhood. I think he's not a bad principal. He also was a teacher at Morton East for a long time so he knows a thing or two about educating in a working class suburb.
But on at least one occassion it did. There was a completely unacceptable expenditure made, teachers were paid for extended day work that was never done, and trips were paid for that were not approved by the court monitor. Here is what happened. The staff in question and the principal of the school were required to pay back funds to CPS, and all of the staff involved were given warning resolutions.
I was actually sitting at the table with CPS legal when these deals were cut. I was extremely upset and wanted the inspector general brought into the situation and CPS legal resisted. I lost that fight completely with the lead special master in Corey H accepting what was basically a plea agreement.
I am not willing to discuss the school or the principal involved. But I will say that it was a higher performing school. I would argue that if CPS was in a similar situation with a weaker performing school it would have likely taken far more serious action including brining in the IG.
So when I see warning resolutions I always wonder what really happened and what was the informal plea agreement made.
Rod Estvan
Rod--you are absolutely corredct here. CPS picks and chooses who goes to IG and want punishments if anmy, are given. If the person is politically connected nothing happens, but if it is exactly the same offence and the accused has no 'friend," they get punished.
And my apologies for the number of typing errors in my last comment.
Sojo and Martinez: Sure, Martinez stayed for the kids . . . that's why he is just collecting a pay check without working. As of now, he is doing nothing on the campus other than taking up space. He is not making any decisions and the campus is crippled because it really has only 2 active principals.
Irrizary may be out. There will be a teacher mutiny. She doesn't have a contract, and they are going to get the LCS not to give her one. As for their scores . . . check out the English and Reading. Very weak, as they've had new English teachers every year, with no continuity in curriculum.
Who knows if Phillips will be back? The politics of the community are going to make principal selection an adventure.
One: The administrative overhead costs. At any "campus" where there be more than one "school" (Bowen; South Shore; Little Village), CPS has multiple principals and also (usually) a campus manager (to keep the principals from turf wars, Michael Scott has basically said). A large school like Lane Tech, Curie, Whitney Young, or even Northside or Payton (which CPS screwed up on by building for a capacity of 1,000 based on "small schools" fantasy) can spend $250,000 on its principaling and be doing quite well. In fact, the principal costs for most of the city's best high schools (the magnets; a few others) is less than a quarter of the costs for the "small schools" fantasy islands.
Two: At no point has CPS subjected its crazy "small schools" philosophy to public scrutiny, so there has been no public debate over why "small schools" are good for Chicago's inner city black and Latino kids, but "success" is greater at larger schools (the ones named above).
Three: "Small Schools" Chicago-style is basically Jim Crow. The argument is that African American (and poor Latino) kids need "personal press" (or one of those other nasty neologisms out of my alma mater, the University of Chicago) as if they are a separate species. But the same kids (working class African Americans and Latinos) do not need "personal press" if they are at Whitney Young or Lane or Curie. Go figure.
Four: The "best" public high schools in the Chicago area (with the possible exception of Lake Forest) are huge: New Trier; Stevenson; the Glenbards, Glenbrooks, and Napervilles, etc.
Chicago's crazy insistence on simply repeating every lie it's been repeating is not only hugely expensive ($1 million to principal the Bowenses as opposed to a quarter of that to principal Lane Tech), but absurdly racist.
Only in Chicago could this nonsense go unexamined (except here and by Substance) for all these years. And given Huberman's devotion to prolonging the Agony of The Miracle, don't count on any reality checks soon. If anything, he follow in Arne Duncan's crazy path and anoint another dozen SuperPrincipals (like Foley and Fraynd) to ride side saddle with "failing" principals (like Marshall and Harper)...
And you can bet he will as soon as somebody screams that the SuperPrincipals are all white.
So far...
If you're going to be fair, compare the small schools to other, nearby larger neighborhood schools.
I wonder what caused Gates and Duncan to decide they didn't work. Don't you need longitudinal data to make that kind of judgment? Small schools in Chicago weren't supported long enough to gather meaningful data.
Even though I'm Jewish, my parents sent me to a Catholic School because the school was smaller and I was over-whelmed at the neighborhood high school. The public high school had 1,500 students in the graduating class while my high school had 50. It made all the difference because the teachers and administration was able to keep on top of things and offer incividual assistance to the students who needed it (this was pre-IDEA).
I have not seen any students which followed students from grade school through high school (or better yet, adulthood) to determine the difference between those who went to large schools compared to smaller schools. These are the only studies which I think would withstand debate.
How can you compare Bowen, SouthShore, and Little Village to Young, Payton, Lane, Northside?
You know better. Selective enrollment vs. neighborhood? Top schools in the state vs. the bottom? Motivated students with strong parental support vs. gang infiltrated unsafe schools?
If I recall correctly, the National results of small schools did not show significant gains in student achievement, but did show an impact in the way students felt about school.
Having worked at Clemente (whose small school structure was technically small learning communities w/ one principal) I experienced the impact on knowing my students. Students developed meaningful relationships with their teachers. Core teachers were able to collaborate and talk about individual students, offering structures to address the needs of students cohorts.
What will happen to these relationships when Bowen consolidates? When South Shore is back to one HUGE school? Teachers wont even be able to find Joey's other 6 teachers, let alone be able to meet during a common planning period to discuss strategies to impact Joey's learning.
But its business as usual. Follow the money. Gates stopped funding small schools.
And when weeds threatened natural vegetation in the nearby Dan Ryan Woods, the Chicago Public Schools teacher seized the moment to teach ecology and recruit a class of volunteers to uproot the invasive plants -- inspiring the community to follow suit.
full story here
http://www.suntimes.com/news/education/1523579,CST-NWS-teacher13.article


Digg
Del.icio.us
Mail

